Re: [VOTE] Retirement of the Apache DataLab

+1 (binding) Thanks, Henry On Wed, Aug 9, 2023, 6:51 AM Denys Yankiv wrote: > +1 > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >

Re: [DISCUSSION] The retirement of the Apache DataLab (Moving to Apache Attic)

HI Dave, Thanks for clarifying the next step for podling. For incubator projects will be retired: https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/websites/production/incubator/content/guides/retirement.html Thanks, Henry - Henry On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 5:39 AM Dave Fisher wrote: > Podlings just

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DataLab (incubating) 2.5.1

Forward my VOTE from dev@ list : +1 (binding) On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 8:20 AM Leonid Frolov wrote: > Hello Incubator Community, > > The Apache DataLab community has voted on and approved a proposal to > release Apache DataLab (incubating) version 2.5.1. We now kindly request > the Incubator

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache DataLab (incubating) 2.5.0

+1 (binding) - LICENSE file looks good - DISCLAIMER file exists - No binaries in source packaging - Source compiled - Headers exists in source code files - NOTICE file exists On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 12:03 AM Yurii Kinash wrote: > Hello Incubator Community, > > The Apache

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduate Apache TVM as TLP

Congrats to the Apache TVM community! - Henry On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 4:21 PM Tianqi Chen wrote: > Dear Community: > > Here is the result thread of the TVM TLP voting . > > Voting thread: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release the Apache Pegasus 2.1.0

Question to Apache Pegasus community. Looks like the website for the project is in Chinese only, or at least the default is in Chinese: http://pegasus.incubator.apache.org Also including the Docs of the project, like this one: https://pegasus.apache.org/2020/02/18/bulk-load-design.html Would

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache TVM as TLP

TVM > Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are > appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache TVM Project: > > * Tianqi Chen > * Timothy Chen > * Zhi Chen > * Byung-Gon Chun > * Ziheng Jiang &g

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache TVM as a TLP

As mentor for the podling, I have seen the Apache TVM community has worked hard to address the concerns and comments from previous graduation discussions. With another successful release, it has shown that it is ready and capable to continue its journey as TLP in Apache Software Foundation. The

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-255) Rename "DLab" to "DataLab" on https://incubator.apache.org/clutch/datalab.html

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17211596#comment-17211596 ] Henry Saputra commented on INCUBATOR-255: - [~johndament] - please close this Jira ticket. I am

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache TVM (incubating) v0.7.0 Release

Congrats to Apache TVM incubating community! - Henry On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 5:42 PM Ziheng Jiang wrote: > Hi all, > > The Apache TVM (incubating) community is happy to announce Apache TVM > (incubating) version 0.7.0! > > Apache TVM (incubating) is an open deep learning compiler stack for >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TVM (incubating) v0.7.0.rc0

NOTICE file looks good LICENSE file looks good DISCLAIMER file exists and looks good Signature file looks good Hash file looks good No binary files in source artifact License header exist in files +1 (binding) On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 11:29 AM Markus Weimer wrote: > +1 (binding) , carrying over

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DLab (incubating) 2.4.0

+1 (binding) Carry my VOTE from dev@ list of DLab incubating. On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 1:17 AM Oleg Fuks wrote: > Hello Incubator Community, > > The Apache DLab community has voted on and approved a proposal to release > Apache DLab (incubating) version 2.4.0. > > We now kindly request the

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache TVM Graduation

Sure, that is easy to fix and good suggestion. But, hope it is not a blocker issue. On Fri, Aug 28, 2020, 5:09 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > The "install from source” page should probably point people to the source > releases rather than the latest code in GitHub. > > Thanks, > Justin >

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache TVM Graduation

Look like TQ has given you answer and proposed solution about the Docker images. Hope that helps. On Fri, Aug 28, 2020, 5:01 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > I am sure there are many other binary packaging out there that use Apache > > project names, for example this one for Apache Spark: >

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache TVM Graduation

the docker image source, the community strives to release > source releases that are 100% Apache compatible. > The users can optionally build these docker images from the source. > > TQ > > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 4:44 PM Henry Saputra > wrote: > > > The Apache do

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache TVM Graduation

The Apache does have official Docker hub [1]. So, the TVM PPMC could, in the near future, create Docker images for Apache TVM for official distribution to help people quickly consume and run the source code releases. [1] https://hub.docker.com/u/apache On Fri, Aug 28, 2020, 4:29 PM Tianqi

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache TVM Graduation

Hi Justin, I am sure there are many other binary packaging out there that use Apache project names, for example this one for Apache Spark: https://hub.docker.com/r/bitnami/spark/ Are you concern about the name? The Docker image hub clearly stated this is not official Docker image from Apache TVM

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache TVM Graduation

t;>> Apache maturity model. > > > >>> > > > >>> Some additional note about the resolution below: the current PPMC > > will > > > be > > > >>> transitioned to the PMC. We have invited all the mentors in the > > curre

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache TVM Graduation

;>> - A successful developer conference that we are continuing to host > > >> this > > >>>>>> year > > >>>>>> - Great community growth, as of now, the community contains 16 > PPMC > > >>>>>> members, 31 commi

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache TVM Graduation

>> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests > of > > >>> the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to > > establish > > >>> a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and > > maintenance &

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache TVM (incubating) v0.6.1.rc1

vote passes with 5 binding +1, 0 non binding +1, no 0 votes, and 0 -1 > vote. > > binding +1 votes > * Tianqi Chen > * Markus Weimer > * Henry Saputra > * Furkan KAMACI > * Byung-Gon Chun > > Vote thread can be found here [1]. > > We will work to complete the rel

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DLab (incubating) 2.3.0

LICENSE file looks good NOTICE file looks good DISCLAIMER file exists and looks good Signature file looks good Checksum files look good No executable and libraries in the source artifact ASF license header looks good +1 (binding) Thx, Henry On Wed, Apr 29, 2020, 2:48 AM Oleg Fuks wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Myriad retirement

+1 (binding) On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 7:14 AM Javi Roman wrote: > Unfortunately, despite an effort to reboot the project about more than one > year, we weren't successful in keeping the existing committers active. At > this point, a decision to retire the podling was taken, and a vote was done >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TVM (incubating) v0.6.0.rc2 (#4443)

NOTICE file looks good LICENSE file looks good DISCLAIMER file exists and looks good Signature file looks good Hash file looks good No binary in source artifact Source code compiled using default License header exist +1 (binding) On Sun, Dec 1, 2019 at 10:48 AM YiZhi Liu wrote: > Dear

Re: DLab needs help

Thank you, all. Really appreciate it. - Henry On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 4:49 AM Paul King wrote: > I've jumped on their dev list as well and can try to help out informally. > Let's see how it goes with Furkan helping and I consider a more formal role > if they still need help. > > Cheers, Paul.

Re: DLab needs help

Hi Justin, I am one of the mentors for DLab and we do need help on active mentors. We have three mentors so do not have enough redundancy when one or two are missing in action. Would love to hear from members of IPMC to help mentoring the project. Thanks, - Henry On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 6:18

Re: [RESUTL] [VOTE]: Release Apache DLab (incubating) 2.1 (RC2)

Congrats to the community of Apache DLab incubating for its first release under Apache Software Foundation. - Henry On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 2:38 AM Bohdan Hliva wrote: > Hi, > > The release vote finished, We’ve received: > 3 (+1 binding) from Justin Mclean, Henry Saputra and P.

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache DLab (incubating) 2.1 (RC2)

+1 (binding) Forward my VOTE from dev@ list - Henry On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 2:54 AM Bohdan Hliva wrote: > Hello Incubator Community, > > The Apache DLab community has voted on and approved a proposal to release > Apache DLab (incubating) version 2.1 (RC2). > > We now kindly request the

Re: [Result][VOTE] Accept Apache TVM into the incubator

Congrats to TVM community. Let's get to work - Henry On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 5:10 PM Tianqi Chen wrote: > Thank you, everyone. > I will follow up by cross-posting in the TVM community as well as give > a public roadmap regarding next steps together with the help from our > mentors. I am

Re: [Proposal] Apache TVM

Thanks, Markus. Hope you do not mind but I have edited the proposal to reflect the changes. Since the people did not actually change, I think we can continue with the VOTE - Henry On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 10:20 AM Markus Weimer wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 9:36 AM Henry Saputra >

Re: [Proposal] Apache TVM

:36 AM Henry Saputra wrote: > HI Tianqi, > > What I can do instead is to restructure the proposal to have PPMC to > include mentors and the PMC members from TVM. > And the rest of committers from TVM will invited from VOTE from PPMC. > > Would that work? > > - Henry >

Re: [Proposal] Apache TVM

like to keep the same structure during incubation. > The current PMC members are actively proposing new committers and PMC > members from different organizations in the past few months and will > continue doing so after the incubation. > > Tianqi > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 9:07

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache TVM into the incubator

+1 (binding) On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 8:44 PM Markus Weimer wrote: > Hi everyone, > > we've discussed the proposal for the TVM project in [1]. The proposal > itself can > be found on the wiki [2]. > > According to the Incubator rules[3] I'd like to call a vote to accept the > new > TVM project

Re: Mentor review of releases was: [VOTE] Release Apache DLab (incubating) 2.1

l out this specific > podling's mentors. But it's not the first time that significant issues were > found after the podling dev vote. > > Craig > > > On Feb 27, 2019, at 9:31 AM, Henry Saputra > wrote: > > > > Thanks, Jason. Will work with team to help follow up wi

Re: [Proposal] Apache TVM

Bit more clarifications, as new podling in Apache, the initial members of PPMC consist of mentors and initial commiters of the project. I understand TVM already work mirroring ASF meritoracy [1] but we need to change the proposal to follow Apache guidelines to help us cross check membership later

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc3

+1 (binding) NOTICE, LICENSE, and DISCLAIMER files exist ASF Header exists and correct No executable files in source artifact - Henry On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 9:54 AM Piyush Ghai wrote: > Hi all, > > Thanks everyone for spending the time to test and vote. > > This vote passes with 5 +1 votes

Re: [Proposal] Apache TVM

Thanks, Marcus. Looking forward for the VOTE thread. This would be great addition to Apache Software Foundation. - Henry On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 9:56 AM Markus Weimer wrote: > Thanks everyone for the discussion thus far. Based on it, I have uploaded > an updated proposal here: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DLab (incubating) 2.1

Thanks, Jason. Will work with team to help follow up with the release artifacts On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 1:52 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Thanks a lot for pointing us to issues we have currently. > > If you need a hand with anything or have any questions just ask. > > Thanks, > Justin >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DLab (incubating) 2.1

-1 (binding) The license header for the files are wrong. It contains extra copyright info: Copyright (c) 2017, EPAM SYSTEMS INC Please follow the guidelines for the header here: https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html Thanks, Henry On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 4:18 AM Bohdan Hliva

Re: [VOTE] Accept Training into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Good luck guys On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 11:58 PM Lars Francke wrote: > Hi everyone, > > we've discussed the proposal for the Training project in [1] and [2]. The > proposal itself can be found on the wiki[3]. > > According to the Incubator rules[4] I'd like to call a vote to accept

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search

>From last thread, I was not sure why Cava was not a suitable name? If there is a concern about trademarked name, the community can always go with Apache Cava name. - Henry On Fri, Feb 15, 2019, 5:21 PM Antoine Toulme Thank you Anu. > > I’ll add your proposal to mine and start a vote Monday if

Re: Podlings not following ASF release policy

Thx Justin, I was assuming the community just simply creating tag in the github and have not published them as releases. Will need to review what had been create there - Henry On Fri, Feb 15, 2019, 2:02 PM Justin Mclean Hi, > > > Will be following up with the community of DLab to make sure

Re: [Proposal] Apache TVM

HI Markus, I have been using TVM as part of ML platform work as consumer of the project, this is great news! Would love to come in and help as a Mentor of this project if it is Ok with the community. Thanks, - Henry On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 10:42 AM Markus Weimer wrote: > Hi, > > we'd like

Re: Podlings not following ASF release policy

Hi Justin, Will be following up with the community of DLab to make sure they follow the ASF release policy. Thanks, - Henry On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 4:51 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > So I just checked the next bunch of podlings to report to see if we have > any other issues with ASF

Re: [VOTE] Shut down unused/inactive incubator lists

+1 On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 4:12 PM sebb wrote: > The following lists are all but inactive: > > announce@ Last post Jan 2008 > android-interest@ Last post Mar 2011 > dev@ - only general circulars > jaxws-tck@ (private) Last post 2012 > projects@ Last post Jul 2011 > user@ - only general

Re: [PROPOSAL] Changing requirements for IPMC

+1 to the new proposals. The key is to have new potential members to be VOTED in to IPMCs, meaning someone from existing IPMC should have know the criteria to be invited. - Henry On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 12:20 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > I looked at the board resolution for the creation

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Griffin (incubating) as a TLP

projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache > Griffin Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are > appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Griffin Project: > > * Alex Lv > * Deyi Yao >

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Griffin (incubating) as a TLP

he.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-148> > > Note that links are given, but some remarks about the results are needed. > > Regards, > Dave > > > On Oct 17, 2018, at 8:35 AM, Henry Saputra wrote: > > > > Thanks for driving the discussion, William. > > >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache OpenWhisk Wskdeploy (incubating) 0.9.8 released

Congrats! On Fri, Sep 14, 2018, 12:01 PM Vincent S Hou wrote: > Hi everyone, > > We are pleased to announce that Apache OpenWhisk Wskdeploy (incubating) > 0.9.8 are released. > > Apache OpenWhisk Wskdeploy is a utility to help you describe and deploy > any part of the OpenWhisk programming

Re: [VOTE] Accept Zipkin into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Sun, Aug 26, 2018, 8:14 PM Mick Semb Wever wrote: > After a brief discussion¹ I would like to call a VOTE to accept Zipkin > into the Apache Incubator. > The full proposal is available on the wiki² and is pasted below in text > form as well. > > This vote will run at least 72

Re: [PROPOSAL] Zipkin for Apache Incubator

Been following Zipkin for a while, glad it is coming to ASF. Hopefully with already healthy community should be quick path to TLP. Looking forward for the VOTE thread. Thanks, - Henry On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 2:30 AM Adrian Cole wrote: > I would like to propose Zipkin as an Apache Incubator

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept DLab into the Apache Incubator

m/jersey/jersey) > > > > === External dependencies licensed under the Python Software License > Version 2: === > > jython (https://github.com/jythontools/jython) > > > > === ASF Projects: === > > Apache Spark, Apache Toree (incubating), Apache Zeppelin > > > > == Cryptography == > > Not applicable. > > > > == Initial Committers == > > * Dmytro Liaskovskyi dmytro_liaskovs...@epam.com > > * Volodymyr Veres volodymyr_ve...@epam.com > > * Oleh Hrynets oleh_hryn...@epam.com > > * Oleh Hrynyk oleh_hry...@epam.com > > * Oleh Martushevskyi oleh_martushevs...@epam.com > > * Oleh Moskovych oleh_moskov...@epam.com > > * Vadym Kuznetsov vadym_kuznet...@epam.com > > * Usein Faradzhev usein_faradz...@epam.com > > * Bohdan Hliva bohdan_hl...@epam.com > > * Oleksandr Melnychuk oleksandr_melnych...@epam.com > > * Mikhail Teplitskiy mikhail_teplits...@epam.com > > * Vira Vitanska vira_vitan...@epam.com > > * Andriana Kovalyshyn andriana_kovalys...@epam.com > > * Oleksandr Chaparin oleksandr_chapa...@epam.com > > * Denys Shliakhov denys_shliak...@epam.com > > * Nazar Barabash nazar_barab...@epam.com > > * Yuriy Holinko yuriy_holi...@epam.com > > * Petro Kotsiuba petro_kotsi...@epam.com > > * Bogdan Rudyi bogdan_ru...@epam.com > > * Mikhail Teplitskyi mikhail_teplits...@epam.com > > > > == Sponsors == > > > > === Champion === > > * P. Taylor Goetz ptgo...@apache.org > > > > === Nominated Mentors === > > * P. Taylor Goetz ptgo...@apache.org > > * Henry Saputra hsapu...@apache.org > > > > === Interested Contributors === > > * Debo Dutta ddu...@apache.org > > > > === Sponsoring Entity === > > * The Apache Incubator > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Griffin-0.2.0-incubating [RC4]

NOTICE file looks good LICENSE file looks good DISCLAIMER file exists and looks good Signature file looks good Hash file looks good No binary in source artifact Updated LICENSE and dependencies to remove category B Source code compiled +1 (binding) - Henry On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 1:04 AM, Lionel

Re: [Vote] Release of Apache-Griffin-0.2.0-incubating [RC1]

Ah my bad, I misunderstood the new guidance On Mon, Mar 26, 2018, 5:50 AM Henk P. Penning <penn...@uu.nl> wrote: > On Mon, 26 Mar 2018, Henry Saputra wrote: > > > Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 03:20:08 +0200 > > From: Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> > &

Re: [Vote] Release of Apache-Griffin-0.2.0-incubating [RC1]

Hank, I thought the reccomendation was you can include md5 as long as including other hash like sha? - Henry On Thu, Mar 22, 2018, 10:43 PM Henk P. Penning wrote: > On Fri, 23 Mar 2018, Lionel Liu wrote: > > > Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 03:13:24 +0100 > > From: Lionel Liu

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating [rc1]

Forward binding vote from dev list: +1 (binding) On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 12:47 PM Johnu George wrote: > Hello incubator PMCs, > > The Apache Mnemonic community PPMCs and developers have voted and > approved the proposal to release Apache Mnemonic 0.10.0 (incubating). > Apache

Re: [Vote] Release of Apache-Griffin-0.1.6-incubating [RC2]

Forward binding vote from dev list: +1 (binding) On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 5:56 PM William Guo wrote: > Hi all, > The Apache Griffin community has voted on and approved a proposal to > release Apache Griffin 0.1.6-rc2. > We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduate Apache Mnemonic project from Incubator

t; Uma Maheswara Rao G > Luke Han > James R. Taylor > Julian Hyde > Henry Saputra > Patrick D. Hunt > P. Taylor Goetz > > Non-Binding Votes: > == > Johnu George > Debojyoti Dutta > Yanhui Zhao > Pierre Smits > Gang Wang > Devaraj K > Liang Ch

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Mnemonic project from Incubator

+1 (binding) - Henry On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang wrote: > Hello IPMC and everyone, > > The Mnemonic community has voted on its Dev list to graduate, The vote > passed with > 14 +1s (including +9s from the PPMC) and 0 -1s. > > Here is the vote result

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.9.0-incubating [rc2]

Forward my VOTE from dev list: +1 (binding) On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 3:14 PM, Johnu George wrote: > Hello incubator PMCs, > > The Apache Mnemonic community PPMCs and developers have voted and approved > the proposal to release Apache Mnemonic 0.9.0 (incubating). > Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Griffin-0.1.5-incubating [rc2]

gt; [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > > Thanks, > William > -- > *From:* William Guo <gu...@apache.org> > *Sent:* Thursday, July 6, 2017 8:46:25 AM > *To:* general@incubator.apache.org > *Cc:* jmcl...@ap

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache DistributedLog as a subproject of Apache BookKeeper

+1 (binding) On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 7:23 PM Xinyu Zhou wrote: > +1 > > Regards, > yukon > > > > On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 3:49am, Leigh Stewart < > lstew...@twitter.com.invalid [lstew...@twitter.com.invalid] > wrote: > +1 > > On Jun 29, 2017 12:55 AM, "Von Gosling"

Re: Call for a new mentor for Apache Slider

Any discussion links about why Slider needs to be merged as Hadoop module? The project seemed to be independent enough to be TLP. - Henry On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 11:23 AM Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli wrote: > I am from Hadoop PMC and am involved a bit in these transition. > >

Re: My Slides from Navigating the Incubator Trenches

Thanks for sharing, John and Justin - Henry On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > And here's my slides on getting your release through the Incubator. > > https://s.apache.org/lSgM > > Great to see everyone there as

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache SystemML project from Incubator

<de...@apache.org> > * Faraz Makari <fmak...@apache.org> > * Felix Schueler<fschue...@apache.org> > * Fred Reiss<fre...@apache.org> > * Glenn Weidner <gweid...@apache.org>

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache SystemML podling graduation

+1 to that The community has proven the ability to run the project in the Apache way and has been very open and responsive to resolve issues raised from IPMC. - Henry On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 3:26 PM Henri Yandell wrote: > +1. Sounds like it's passed time to discuss

Re: [VOTE] - Approve the release of Apache Joshua incubating 6.1 (rc4)

LICENSE file looks good NOTICE file looks good DISCLAIMER file looks good No 3rd party exes in source artifact Signature file for source looks good Hash files for source look good +1 (binding) On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 1:44 AM, Tommaso Teofili wrote: > Hello incubator

Re: [VOTE] Apache DistributedLog release 0.4.0-incubating (RC#4)

+1 (binding) On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 11:55 PM, Sijie Guo wrote: > Hi all, > > Please review and vote on the release candidate #4 for the Apache > DistributedLog version 0.4.0-incubating, as follows: > > [ ] +1, Approve the release > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please

Re: [VOTE] Accept Amaterasu into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi all, > > following the discussion thread, I think we can start the vote on > accepting Amaterasu into the Apache Incubator. > > The ASF voting rules are described: > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache DistributedLog release 0.4.0-incubating

Thanks for the review guys, will come back to dev@ list to update the release artifacts. - Henry On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Josh Elser <els...@apache.org> wrote: > Marvin Humphrey wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Henry Saputra<henry.sapu..

Re: [VOTE] Apache DistributedLog release 0.4.0-incubating

The question is whether we need to keep this section: Portions of this software were developed by Twitter. Copyright Twitter, 2017 in the NOTICE file. Since Twitter already signed off the source contributions, we could probably remove this section. As for initial Copyright notice, we should

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.13.0-incubating (RC2)

NOTICE file looks good LICENSE file looks good DISCLAIMER file looks good Hash files look good Signature file looks good No 3rd party exes in source artifact ASF license header +1 (binding) On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 8:58 PM, Arvind Surve wrote: > Please vote on

Re: Podling Graduation Rally

Ah yes, sorry, totally missed your message. On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 3:02 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > Hi > > I guess you missed my message. I gonna deal with CarbonData. > > Regards > JB > > On Feb 13, 2017, 19:26, at 19:26, Henry Sa

Re: Podling Graduation Rally

Thanks, John. I think CarbonData and SystemML may ready for graduation. Looks like Luciano will work with SystemML, then I will work with CarbonData. - Henry On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 4:28 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > All, > > As mentioned in this month's report, there are

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.12.0-incubating (RC2)

+1 (binding) LICENSE file looks good NOTICE file looks Ok DISCLAIMER file exists Signature files looks good (need to move KEYS to distribution directory) Checksum files look good Source compiled No 3rd party exes in source artifact Thanks, - Henry On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Arvind Surve

Re: [VOTE] Apache CarbonData 1.0.0-incubating release (RC2)

+1 (binding) - Henry On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 4:59 AM, Jacky Li <13561...@qq.com> wrote: > Hi Incubator PMC, > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache > CarbonData(incubating) version 1.0.0. > > PPMC has passed the vote, here's the PPMC vote thread for 1.0.0 release: >

Re: [VOTE] MXNet to enter the Incubator

+1 (binding) Good luck! On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 8:20 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > Hi Incubator folk, > >I would like to call a vote for accepting "MXNet" for incubation in the > Apache Incubator. > > The full proposal is available at this wiki link: > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

Hi Henri, Could you update the proposal for === Mailing Lists === section to list existing and required mailing lists from Incubator? Thanks, Henry On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 9:12 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > Hello Incubator, > > I'd like to propose a new incubator Apache MXNet

Re: Request to join IPMC

Markus, Please send the request to private@incubator mailing list. - Henry On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Markus Weimer wrote: > Hi, > > I'm an Apache member and am already helping the Hivemall project as a > mentor. It is about time I join the IPMC :) > > Thanks, > > Markus

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

This is great news and I am looking forward to it =) According to proposal, the community want to stick with Github issues for tracking issues and bugs? I suppose this needs a nod by Greg Stein as rep from Apache Infra to confirm that this is ok for incubation and how would it impact during

Re: [VOTE] Bring Griffin to Apache Incubator

Of course my Vote +1 (binding) On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:40 PM Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > As the champion for Griffin, I would like to start VOTE to bring the > project as Apache incubator podling. > > Here is the direct

[VOTE] Bring Griffin to Apache Incubator

se of existing Apache continuous testing infrastructure. The resulting load should not be very large. Initial Committers William Go Alex Lv Vincent Zhao Shawn Sha John Liu Liang Shao Affiliations The initial committers are employees of eBay Inc. Sponsors Champion Henry Saputra (hsapu...@apache.o

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing Griffin for Apache incubator

Seemed like the discussion is calming down Will send VOTE thread end of day tomorrow. Thanks, Henry On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 3:30 PM Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > As the champion for Griffin, I would like to bring up discussion to > bring the

Re: [VOTE] Weex to enter the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Best of luck, guys! On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Edward J. Yoon wrote: > Greetings! > > I would like to call a vote for accepting "Weex" for incubation in the > Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available below. We ask the > Incubator PMC to

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing Griffin for Apache incubator

t; > John > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 6:30 PM Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > As the champion for Griffin, I would like to bring up discussion to > > bring the project as Apache incubator podling. > > > >

[DISCUSS] Proposing Griffin for Apache incubator

se of existing Apache continuous testing infrastructure. The resulting load should not be very large. Initial Committers William Go Alex Lv Vincent Zhao Shawn Sha John Liu Liang Shao Affiliations The initial committers are employees of eBay Inc. Sponsors Champion Henry Saputra (hsapu...@apache.o

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CarbonData 0.2.0-incubating release

. - Henry On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 5:23 PM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: No. I voted -1. You have a +2 right now. On Nov 18, 2016 20:20, "Liang Chen" <chenliang6...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all > > Finally, this vote passed with the following result: >

Re: Apache SystemML is looking for new mentors

Hi Luciano, Please let me know if SystemML still needs help for an active mentor. Some projects I mentored will be graduating soon so I will have bandwidth to do active mentor and contribute to this project. Thanks, Henry On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 1:50 AM, Luciano Resende

Re: [VOTE] Apache CarbonData 0.2.0-incubating release

Thanks for the info, Liang. As John has mentioned, one way we could make it easier to build is to have BUILD.md file that explain how to build CarbonData properly, Should not block this release. - Henry On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:58 PM, Liang Chen wrote: > Hi

Re: [VOTE] Apache CarbonData 0.2.0-incubating release

I think we need to fix this properly. I recommend to just commit the generated Java Thrift code to make sure people could build it without waiting for Maven central push. - Henry On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 3:50 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Hi sorry but I'm -1 since I cannot

Re: [VOTE] Apache CarbonData 0.2.0-incubating release

Hi Liang, Ravindran, >From release artifacts it looks good: Hash files look good Signature file looks good Disclaimer file exist No 3rd party exes in release source artifact +1 Should probably add in the README to install Thrift to install locally. - Henry On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 6:46 AM,

Re: [VOTE] Apache CarbonData 0.2.0-incubating release

So, with this release, the carbondata-format module is pre-built and pushed to maven repo so when someone run carbondata mvn install it should pull it from central? - Henry On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 8:39 PM, ravipesala wrote: > Hi > > Using the command "mvn clean install"

Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:19 PM Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I logged in. My username is Henry Saputra > > > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 12:06 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > Are you log

Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

I logged in. My username is Henry Saputra On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 12:06 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > Are you logged in? If so, what is your username? I can double check your > permissions. > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:02 PM Henry Saputra <henry.sapu.

Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

wish/need to be > aware of? > > None > > How has the community developed since the last report? > > The community activity increased: many new users started to use and test > CarbonData, we had more than 300 issues created till Nov; Two new finance > enterprises

Re: [DISCUSS] OpenWhisk Proposal

Ah, I didnt know ASF infra is ok to let Github as main source repo for a podling. I stand corrected. - Henry On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 1:06 AM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] OpenWhisk Proposal

I second John, about Github uses. The statement "As a community we would like to keep the master repository as well as issue tracking on GitHub " at currently stand is a no-no and putting in proposal would make it as goal which at this time not an option

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating

Checking the source release artifact: LICENSE file looks good DISCLAIMER file exists RAT check passes No 3rd party exes in the source artifacts Signature files look good Hash files look good +1 (binding) - Henry On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Swapnil Bawaskar wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Apache CarbonData 0.1.1-incubating release

carbondata-0.1.1-incubating-src.zip" rather than > "carbondata-parent-0.1.1-incubating-source-release.zip". > > Please consider fixing these before the next release (and in fact > earlier for the issues with README.md). > > Julian > > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 10:

Re: [VOTE] Apache CarbonData 0.1.1-incubating release

DISCLAIMER file exits LICENSE file looks good NOTICE file look good Artifacts has incubating tag No executables binaries in source artifacts Can compile from source +1 (binding) - Henry On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 3:06 AM, Liang Big data wrote: > Hi all, > > PPMC vote for

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >