Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft (Incubating) 1.0.0

Transferring my +1 vote from dev@nlpcraft.a.o With regards, Cos On 2/15/23 12:45, Sergey Kamov wrote: Hello all, This is a call for a vote to release Apache NLPCraft (incubating) version 1.0.0. The Apache NLPCraft community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache NLPCraft

Resigning as Datalab mentor

Please consider this as my official resignation from the role of Datalab's mentor as I don't have any cycles for the project anymore. -- With regards, Konstantin Boudnik - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft - Java Client (incubating) 0.7.2

+1 (binding) carrying the vote over from dev@ With regards, Cos On 14.12.2020 21:15, Aaron Radzinski wrote: Hello all, This is a call for a vote to release Apache NLPCraft - Java Client (incubating) version 0.7.2. Apache NLPCraft is a library for adding a natural language interface to any

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft (incubating) 0.7.2

+1 [vote carry over from the dev@ voting] With regards, Cos On 23.11.2020 23:21, Aaron Radzinski wrote: Hello all, This is a call for a vote to release Apache NLPCraft (incubating) version 0.7.2. Apache NLPCraft is a library for adding a natural language interface to any application. The

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft (incubating) 0.7.1

+1 [binding], vote carry over from [1] -- Cos [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r333cd17f76303c86b603aa80ce7faa96b443c0351d680b22081a9d64%40%3Cdev.nlpcraft.apache.org%3E On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 10:55PM, Aaron Radzinski wrote: > Hello all, > This is a call for a vote to release Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft (incubating) 0.7.0

+1 [binding] (carrying the vote from dev@) -- With regards, Cos On September 30, 2020 10:34:10 PM GMT+03:00, Aaron Radzinski wrote: >Hello all, >This is a call for a vote to release Apache NLPCraft (incubating) >version >0.7.0. Apache NLPCraft is a library for adding a natural language

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft (incubating) 0.7.0

+1 [binding] carrying the vote over from dev@ -- With regards, Cos On 2020-09-30 22:34, Aaron Radzinski wrote: Hello all, This is a call for a vote to release Apache NLPCraft (incubating) version 0.7.0. Apache NLPCraft is a library for adding a natural language interface to any application.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft (Incubating) 0.6.2

+1 [binding] - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE as expected - No binary files - Signatures and checksums are ok -- With regards, Cos On 2020-07-16 00:23, Aaron Radzinski wrote: Hello all, This is a call for a vote to release Apache NLPCraft (incubating) version 0.6.2. Apache NLPCraft

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft (Incubating) 0.5.0

Justin, thanks a lot for the comments and keeping us honest. I want to make sure we are on the same page: do you see these issues as critical or they can be addressed in the consequent release? Thanks, On 2020-05-05 06:02, Justin Mclean wrote: Hi, Fixed in master. However, there are

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft (Incubating) 0.5.0

+1 [binding] Checked - signatures - license compliance - checksums Thank you. --   Cos On 2020-04-23 12:52, Aaron Radzinski wrote: Hello all, This is a call for a vote to release Apache NLPCraft (incubating) version 0.5.0. The Apache NLPCraft community has voted on and approved a proposal

[RESULT] Was: [VOTE] Accept NLPCraft into Apache Incubator

Justin Mclean Furkan KAMACI Byung-Gon Chun Sheng Wu Kevin Ratnasekera Konstantin Boudnik [non-binding] Aditya Sharma YuanSheng Wang coolsoul Swapnil M Mane Cihad Guzel I will start all initiation activities in the coming couple of days. -- With regards, Cos On 2/9/20 4:54 PM

[RESULT] Was: [VOTE] Accept NLPCraft into Apache Incubator

Kevin Ratnasekera Konstantin Boudnik [non-binding] Aditya Sharma YuanSheng Wang coolsoul Swapnil M Mane Cihad Guzel I will start all initiation activities in the coming couple of days. -- With regards, Cos On 2/9

Re: [VOTE] Accept NLPCraft into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On 2/9/20 4:54 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: Hello. As the discussion of NLPCraft proposal [1] has been wrapped up [2] I would like to call a VOTE to accept this project into the Apache Incubator. Please cast your vote: [ ] +1, bring NLPCraft into Incubator [ ] +0, I don't

[VOTE] Accept NLPCraft into Apache Incubator

Hello. As the discussion of NLPCraft proposal [1] has been wrapped up [2] I would like to call a VOTE to accept this project into the Apache Incubator. Please cast your vote: [ ] +1, bring NLPCraft into Incubator [ ] +0, I don't care either way [ ] -1, do not bring NLPCraft into

Re: [DISCUSS] NLPCraft Proposal

Looks like the discussion is winding down a bit. So, to sum it up: - CC shall be removed during code transfer to ASF - an SGA will be expected from DataLingvo - as the original NLPCraft developers from DataLingvo are all a part of NLPCraft project there is no need for explicit copyright

Re: [DISCUSS] NLPCraft Proposal

for? Cheers, Paul. On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 10:43 AM Konstantin Boudnik wrote: Good time of the time to all! I'd like to bring this new interesting project for the discussion, comments and feedback with the aim of starting a formal [VOTE] of its acceptance into Incubator. People behind

Re: [DISCUSS] NLPCraft Proposal

roversial a little while back but seemed to die down as per > LEGAL-402. As someone who hasn't been following this lately, is that > something the project needs to manage expectations for? > > Cheers, Paul. > > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 10:43 AM Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >

Re: [DISCUSS] NLPCraft Proposal

e looking for a fourth mentor then I volunteer if you are interested. > > Regards, > Dave > > > On Feb 3, 2020, at 4:43 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > > > > Good time of the time to all! > > > > I'd like to bring this new interesting project for the

[DISCUSS] NLPCraft Proposal

Good time of the time to all! I'd like to bring this new interesting project for the discussion, comments and feedback with the aim of starting a formal [VOTE] of its acceptance into Incubator. People behind this project aren't new to Apache: some of them were behind the Apache Ignite

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept DLab into the Apache Incubator

Cool, would be happy to help! -- Regards, Cos On August 20, 2018 10:25:32 PM GMT+03:00, "P. Taylor Goetz" wrote: >Awesome. Thanks Cos. I’ll add you as a mentor. > >-Taylor > >> On Aug 20, 2018, at 2:11 PM, Konstantin Boudnik >wrote: >> >> Looks l

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept DLab into the Apache Incubator

Looks like I am bit late and vote is closed, but I still want to cast my +1 - I have helped this project during my time at EPAM and wish it all the success! If the project needs more mentors at this point - I have some spare cycles to burn. Thanks! -- With regards, Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik

Re: [VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.3.0.0-incubating Release

+1 [biding] - signature check [ok] - checksum check [ok] - licenses check (RAT) [ok] I haven't tried to build it because of the complexity of the build process and multiplicity of the environment configurations. To lower the entry barrier, I would recommend the community to think how to wrap

Re: ASF hosted binaries collecting user data without an explicit opt-in

While I am completely agree with your point, and the Ignite graduation is the water under the bridge, this is in an important point for the current podlings to consider. Perhaps it could be done elsewhere as well, but I am not sure where would be the best place for it. Thoughts? Thanks, Cos --

Re: ASF hosted binaries collecting user data without an explicit opt-in

Thanks Greg. I have already started the conversation on private@ignite and opened IGNITE-5413 -- Take care, Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622 Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author, and do not necessarily represent the

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache MADlib podling

+1 [binding] On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 04:56PM, FENG, Xixuan (Aaron) wrote: > Greetings IPMC! > > The discussion seems to have died down, so I'm calling the > vote: I propose that we graduate Apache MADlib from the Incubator. > The full text of the proposal is below. The discuss thread can be

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.11-rc3

+1 [binding] - checked the RAT, build, NOTICE - checked the signature, and sha512 Concern: Apache git is the primary source of the code for the release. To me, it is more credible when you point to the commit is on the Apache server, rather than a github. Thanks, Cos On Wed, May 10, 2017 at

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.10-rc2

+1 [binding] - signing: ok - md5: ok (next time, please use the format that can be used for auto-validation with -c) - sha: ok (next time, please use the format that can be used for auto-validation with -c; please rename the suffix to sha512 - it took me a while to figure out what algo was used)

Re: SystemML webpage

; > Thanks! > Deron > > > On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 8:13 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Hello. >> >> I recently came around >> https://systemml.incubator.apache.org/ >> >> and have noticed that the project name doesn't

Re: SystemML webpage

Hello. I recently came around https://systemml.incubator.apache.org/ and have noticed that the project name doesn't include "(incubating)" tag, which is a requirement for the incubating podlings, IIRC. Can the PPMC address this issue, please? I am Cc'ing general@incubator.apache.org list to

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

> * Bruce Schuchardt <bschucha...@apache.org> > * Dan Smith <upthewatersp...@apache.org> > * Darrel Schneider <dschnei...@apache.org> > * Dave Barnes <dbar...@apache.org> > * Eric Shu <esh...@apache.org> > * Greg Chase <gregch...@apache.org> > * Hi

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

Besides, last time I checked there's no such thing as "diversity requirement" in the graduation. It is indeed being asked here and there, but so far it isn't an official IPMC requirement. And I'd hate to make a "diversity scape-goat" out of the project that has created a very welcome

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating) as a TLP

g> > * Dan Smith <upthewatersp...@apache.org> > * Darrel Schneider <dschnei...@apache.org> > * Dave Barnes <dbar...@apache.org> > * Eric Shu <esh...@apache.org> > * Greg Chase <gregch...@apache.org> > * Hitesh Khamesra <hiteshkhame...@apache.org> >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M3 release

+1 (binding) - archive enames: ok - keys : ok - signatures and hashes : ok - binary archive's content and DISCLAIMER, LICENSE and NOTICE : ok - source archive's content and DISCLAIMER, LICENSE and NOTICE : ok - build from source : ok Thanks, Cos On Tue, Aug

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M2

+1 [biding] Signature is good sha256 is good release tar content matches the commit build works out of the source code Minor stuff on top of Justin's detailed analysis: - suffix for sha256 file is better be sha256, looks confusing otherwise - the file itself isn't properly formatted, which

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Zeppelin from the Incubator

+1 [binding] On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 09:01AM, moon soo Lee wrote: > Hi, > > Apache Zeppelin started incubating about a year and 4 months ago > (2014-12-23) and the members of the community think that it is ready to > graduate from the incubator to be a TLP. > > Since it's inception, Zeppelin

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.9-rc1

+1 - checksums/signatures are Ok - rat is clean (although, having 700+ files without a header looks confusing) - can build On the comments side (on top of what Justine already caught): - having a pom just for running rat? Might as well hook up all the cmake shenanigan to it and safe the

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.9-rc1

Yup, I found this quite confusing indeed to have a bunch of files like modules/**/*.c without any licenses nor mentioning anywhere. Am I missing some previous discussions that wave the need for the headers in those? Cos On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 04:51PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > The

Re: [VOTE] Accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator

.com/google/styleguide [License: BSD] > * gtest: https://github.com/google/googletest [License: BSD] > * iwyu: http://include-what-you-use.org/ [License: UIUC BSD-Like] > > Cryptography: N/A > > == Required Resources == > > === Mailing lists === > * priv...

Re: [DISCUSS] Quickstep incubation proposal

of Exasol etc rather > than plugging more SQL into NOSQL etc(from what I gather) and I am happy to > see it pitched. > > Tom > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 6:41 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> wrote: > > > It's been a week since this thread started and surprisin

Re: [DISCUSS] Quickstep incubation proposal

/A > > == Required Resources == > > === Mailing lists === > * priv...@quickstep.incubator.apache.org (moderated subscriptions) > * comm...@quickstep.incubator.apache.org > * d...@quickstep.incubator.apache.org > * iss...@quickstep.incubator.apache.org > * u...@quick

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.9alpha-rc2

+1 [binding] On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 11:54AM, Frank McQuillan wrote: > Hello Incubator PMC, > > Based on comments from the PMC regarding MADlib release candidate > v1.9alpha-rc1 >

In-Memory Computing Summit 2016

[...not a spam...] In case someone in the incubating projects is interested to participate in the 2nd annual In-Memory Computing Summit in San Francisco, the CFP is still going until Feb 3rd The call for speaking proposals for the In-Memory Computing Summit 2016

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin (incubating) 0.5.6-incubating (RC2)

Silly me - send this email too early. I see the vote is closed already. Sorry for the noise. Cos On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 10:43AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > Thanks Alex! > > BTW, the vote has been open for the whole week now, and it seems that you have > enough binding votes to ma

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin (incubating) 0.5.6-incubating (RC2)

release! > > -- > Alex > > 1. https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/zeppelin/KEYS > 2. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-622 > 3. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-623 > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 6:22 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.or

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin (incubating) 0.5.6-incubating (RC2)

+1 [binding] Verified: - signature (ok). [1] - sha512 checksum (ok) - licenses (ok) [2] - tag (ok) - build from sources (ok) [3] [1] The signing key isn't available from the release area's KEYS file. Please update ASAP [2] Every time I need to verify the release I have to spend like half an

Re: [VOTE] Retire Ripple

+1 [binding] On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 08:54PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Greetings, > > The Ripple community has been discussing retirement on their dev list. > > http://s.apache.org/LjX > > It would be more clear cut if there had been a VOTE thread, but since the > discussion took place on

Re: Impala commit policy

I am not sure what "start with no explicit commit policy" even means. Will there be no commits, until the discussion on the subject happens? How code changes will be going into the source base? Cos On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 10:01AM, Tom White wrote: > The vote to accept Impala into the incubator

Re: [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

-0 [binding] On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 01:03PM, Henry Robinson wrote: > Hi - > > The [DISCUSS] thread has been quiet for a few days, so I think there's been > sufficient opportunity for discussion around our proposal to bring Impala > to the ASF Incubator. > > I'd like to call a VOTE on that

Re: [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

Come to think of it a bit more, yes I am not satisfied with the outcome of the CTR/RTC exchange in the project. Hence changing my vote to -1 [binding] On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:47AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > -0 [binding] > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 01:03PM, Henry Robinson wrot

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 05:12PM, Chris Douglas wrote: > RTC is regulation. That's not a synonym for control when it's > conflated with suspicion of people. Regulation is a set of deliberate > checks on a system. > > Good regulation estimates (or reacts to) a system's natural excesses, > then

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:29PM, Harbs wrote: > This kind of underscores my observation that a large part of this debate is > driven by source control technologies. > > RTC seems popular for projects using Git, while CTR seems popular in > communities using SVN. Well, Apache Bigtop is now

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 02:00AM, Ross Gardler wrote: > The suggestion is to add it to the proposal template - that's before > incubation starts. I think this is a great idea! > -Original Message- > From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:niall.pember...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, November 23,

Re: [DISCUSS] Kudu incubator proposal

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:17AM, Chris Mattmann wrote: > Hi Alex, > > We don’t have to hear from every author. If we don’t have an ICLA > or SGA on file for them, we’ll remove their code from the initial Yup, that's the concern I was trying to address by asking to reach out to the contributors.

Re: [DISCUSS] Kudu incubator proposal

My point exactly, thanks Henry! On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 10:51PM, Henry Saputra wrote: > Hi Todd, > > One concern, other IPMCs could help correct me if I am wrong, for > project that already open source and accepting contributions from > individuals which not part of initial committers is that it

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 11:12PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 10:48 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny > wrote: > > > > >> > > > Except that there seems to be great disagreement among the Members as to > > > whether RTC is somehow anti-Apache-Way. > > > > > > If you want

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 06:06PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > On the contrary... The business of the Incubator and IPMC is to help > > podlings > > and their communities to g

Re: [DISCUSS] Kudu incubator proposal

Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > ++ > Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > ++++++++++

Re: [DISCUSS] Impala incubator proposal

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 02:26PM, Henry Robinson wrote: > Hi Henry - > > Absolutely, although I want to point out that only two of our three mentors which clearly constitutes "almost all" as Henry pointed out :) On a different note: have the initial delopers considered a possibility of bringing

Re: [DISCUSS] Kudu incubator proposal

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 10:43AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Atri Sharma wrote: > > > Sounds great. > > > > I would love to be an help as a committer, if possible. This seems to be > > fantastic in line with my focus areas and can help existing big

Re: [VOTE] Retire Corinthia

+1 (binding) On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 07:01PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Greetings, > > The Corinthia community has voted to retire: > > http://s.apache.org/odN > > This is a vote of the IPMC to confirm the decision to retire the podling. > > [ ] +1 to retire Corinthia from the Incubator > [

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 04:45PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 08:53AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 5:25 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.

Re: [DISCUSS] Kudu incubator proposal

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 04:33PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Atri, > > > > > > Thanks for the interest! Following the example of other recent incubator > > > projects, we would like to keep the initial committer list to those who > > are > > > already have a track record of contributions

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 08:53AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 5:25 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > > ...RTC can be framed as "I don't trust you to do things right"... > > Or also "I don't trust myself 100% to do things right here and would > like

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 04:50PM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > >... > > > 1) You're right, I don't trust anybody to make code changes to a complex > > project with zero oversight. I currently work on a project that I > > > > I have

Re: [DISCUSS] Kudu incubator proposal

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 04:53PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> wrote: > > > So, you're saying that people were chosen to be listed or not as the > > contributors merely by the amount of the co

Re: Unsubscribe not working

Potentially it might mean that you have also subscribed from other mail aliases? On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 07:45PM, Robert Kausch - US wrote: > Sorry for having to send this to the whole list, but I don't think the > unsubscribe functionality is working. I've been trying for 10 days, and I'm >

Re: Concerning Sentry: A disagreement over the Apache Way and graduation

On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 05:27PM, Vinod Vavilapalli wrote: > Many of the active TLPs do tend to center all project discussions on JIRA as > opposed to mailing lists. OTOH, non-code discussions are usually best served > on mailing lists. > > Instead of making it a JIRA vs mailing list discussion,

Re: Concerning Sentry: A disagreement over the Apache Way and graduation

On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 04:27PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On 11/02/2015 03:57 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > > I see this (the release discussion threads you linked) as a semi-mature > > community that's well aligned. A number of folks responded to the request > > for discussion and said they were in

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 07:25AM, Rich Bowen wrote: > > > On 11/01/2015 07:48 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > >Thanks for sending this around, Paul - I should've linked it to the vote > >thread, duh... > > > >Anyway, back to Rich's question: the answer is 'yes' a

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 09:11AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > Le 01/11/15 20:30, Rich Bowen a écrit : > > On Oct 28, 2015 4:26 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" <c...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Following discussions [1] about its current status, the Groovy community &

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

gt; Bertrand): > https://github.com/apache/incubator-groovy/blob/master/MATURITY.adoc > On 2 Nov 2015 5:30 am, "Rich Bowen" <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: > > > On Oct 28, 2015 4:26 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" <c...@apache.org> wrote: > > >

[RESULT] [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

The VOTE to graduate Groovy to the top-level project has passed with 15 binding +1s and 3 non-binding +1s. No 0 or -1 votes were casted. Binding: Chris Mattmann Konstantin Boudnik Julian Hyde Marvin Humphrey Emmanuel Lécharny Sergio Fernández Steve Loughran

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

n.html#tlp-resolution> should > be proposed on the general incubator list <general@incubator.apache.org> > before > a VOTE <http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html> is started to allow > feedback. > > John > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 2:3

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

her <pascalschumac...@apache.org> Jochen Theodorou <blackd...@apache.org> Andrew Bayer <aba...@apache.org> Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> Roman Shaposhnik <r...@apache.org> Jim Jagielski <j...@apache.org> Again - my apologies for the mes

Re: [VOTE] Retire Droids (IPMC)

+1 On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 12:36PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Greetings, > > The Droids community has voted to retire: > > http://s.apache.org/Rko > > This is a vote of the IPMC to confirm the decision to retire the podling. > > [ ] +1 to retire Droids from the incubator > [ ] -1 to keep

Re: [VOTE] Retire Kalumet (IPMC)

+1 On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 12:38PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Greetings, > > The Kalumet community has voted to retire: > > http://s.apache.org/fP > > This is a vote of the IPMC to confirm the decision to retire the podling. > > [ ] +1 to retire Kalumet from the incubator > [ ] -1 to keep

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

, John D. Ament wrote: > The only thing that catches me off guard is lack of a discuss thread. But > I can give +1 > On Oct 28, 2015 16:26, "Konstantin Boudnik" <c...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Following discussions [1] about its current status, the Groovy community

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

org> Pascal Schumacher <pascalschumac...@apache.org> Jochen Theodorou <blackd...@apache.org> Andrew Bayer <aba...@apache.org> Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> Also, we missed one of the mentors in action; the invitation has been extended to him, but due

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

will fix it before adding to the board's agenda for Nov (assuming the vote passes). Cos On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 02:14PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> wrote: > > > [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Groovy from the Incubator. >

[VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

(binding) Bertrand Delacretaz (binding) Andrew Bayer (binding) Jim Jagielski (binding) Konstantin Boudnik (binding) Russel Winder Guillaume Alleon The Groovy community has: * completed all required paperwork: https://incubator.apache.org/projects/groovy.html * completed

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Groovy from the Incubator

+1 (binding, reiterating my earlier vote on dev@groovy) On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:26PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > Following discussions [1] about its current status, the Groovy community > has voted [2] to graduate from the Incubator. The vote passed [3] with 12 +1s > total, 5 ar

Re: Mentor disengagement - a suggestion

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 06:10AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > If it can work, that is very good. With intermittent availability, I have > often seen the need for a spare. Exactly! I've been out for 6 weeks back in May/June and missed all the reports and other activity on the projects I am/was a mentor

Re: [DISCUSS] [REVISED] Mentor neutrality policy

And still -1 on the revised proposal for the same reasons I stated before. Cos On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 11:39PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > First off: Can we *please* focus on the revised proposal and not get > into a loop about the original email? I'll change the topic if that helps. > > The revised

Re: [DISCUSS] Mentor neutrality policy

On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 06:52PM, Reto Gmür wrote: > On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Roman Shaposhnik > wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 6:07 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > > > Hi Incubator folks, > > > > > > I would like to propose we adopt a mentor

Re: [DISCUSS] Mentor neutrality policy

Continuing this line of reasoning I won't be able to mentor _any_ of the projects I've mentored or still mentoring because of different levels of involvements either at my $dayjob or with the organizations that donated the code initially. Is this really an intent of the original proposal to

Re: [DISCUSS] Mentor neutrality policy

On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 02:45PM, Pierre Smits wrote: > Producing good code is a community effort. When it comes down to just the > mentors fix that themselves, there is something wrong with the community of > the podling. > > This discussion is not about what participants do with their mentor hat

Re: [DISCUSS] Mentor neutrality policy

On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 09:06AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > On 10/10/2015 07:51 AM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > > We should address perceived, and certainly provable, instances of > > corruption at the Foundation directly, rather than prescribe policy that > > seeks to prevent future instances as if there

Re: [DISCUSS] Retire the Droids podling (was Re: Droids Podling Issue)

Looks like it is one of those situations that happens from time to time. Makes sense to me. Thanks. Cos On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 06:26AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > It's been a month and we haven't heard from Thorsten, nor any lurker > in the Droids community. > > I've changed the subject to make

Re: [DISCUSS] Mentor neutrality policy

On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 09:05PM, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 10.10.2015 20:11, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 09:06AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > >> On 10/10/2015 07:51 AM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > >>> We should address perceived, and certainly provable,

Re: [DISCUSS] Mentor neutrality policy

On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 11:38AM, Greg Trasuk wrote: > Hi Daniel: > > Discussion intertwined below… > > Cheers, > > Greg Trasuk > > > On Oct 9, 2015, at 11:07 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > > > > Hi Incubator folks, > > > > I would like to propose we adopt a mentor

Re: [DISCUSS] Mentor neutrality policy

hris and Ross on immorality of the guilt-by-association policy. Cos > Best regards, > > Pierre Smits > > *OFBiz Extensions Marketplace* > http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ > > On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 1:31 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> wrote: > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Mentor neutrality policy

On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 08:36PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > Does there always have to be an actual problem before we can propose a > policy? must we always be reactive instead of proactive? "We can't just stay on a side and wait, we should do something!" - sounds all too familiar, eh? > Yes, I am in

Re: Should Apache VOTEs be in a first-come, first-serve queue?

Am I the only one who sees an issue of moral hazard in this proposal? On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:28PM, Marko Rodriguez wrote: > HI, > > Here is an idea: > > Can we offer $20 to the first 3 binding voters of a release on general@? We > would structure the contract as such: > > "The first

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Calcite from the Apache Incbuator

+1 (binding). Good luck! On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 03:09PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > The Calcite community has established consensus and held a > successful vote with 20 +1 votes in favor of proposing > graduation to a top-level project, including 12 votes from > committers and 6 votes from IPMC

Re: [VOTE] Accept MADlib into the Apache Incubator

* N/A > > == Required Resources == > > === Mailing lists === > * priv...@madlib.incubator.apache.org (moderated subscriptions) > * comm...@madlib.incubator.apache.org > * d...@madlib.incubator.apache.org > * iss...@madlib.incubator.apache.org > * u...@madlib.incubato

Re: September 2015 Report

I have just updated the podlings.xml to reflect that Ignite has graduated. So they won't be reporting as a part of Incubator any more. Thanks, Cos On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 08:58AM, jan i wrote: > Hi. > > I really like our open way of reporting using the wiki but we have a small > flaw in the

Re: [VOTE] Accept HAWQ into the Apache Incubator

; require integration with Docker support. > > == Initial Committers == > * Lirong Jian > * Hubert Huan Zhang > * Radar Da Lei > * Ivan Yanqing Weng > * Zhanwei Wang > * Yi Jin > * Lili Ma > * Jiali Yao > * Zhenglin Tao > * Ruilong Huo > * M

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Usergrid from the Incubator

+1 (binding) Good luck! Cos On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 04:15PM, Dave wrote: The Usergrid project has made three releases from the Incubator (1.0.0, 1.0.1 and 1.0.2), has added multiple and diverse committers, and the project has completed all required items on the graduation check-list [1].

Re: Reform of Incubator

like. Julian On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 9:03 PM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote: On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 11:36AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 12:37 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:05 AM, Roman Shaposhnik ro

Re: Reform of Incubator

On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 02:50PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: On 08/04/2015 02:45 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: Sorry if it rubs the wrong way. However, we just have seen through the Ignite discussion (most recent one) the examples where personal expectations were represented as graduation

  1   2   3   >