Re: [DISCUSS] KIE Proposal

On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 at 16:27, Jason Porter wrote: > > > On Dec 6, 2022, at 01:43, Christofer Dutz > wrote: > > > > Hi Jason, > > > > Well, those numbers are a bit better than the initial ones. > > Thing is: Mentors will not only have to help onboard people to Apache > and teach them how to do

Re: [DISCUSS] KIE Proposal

Wow, 137 GitHub repositories! OK, so 38 are archived and 19 are forks, but that still leaves 80! Do you have a rough idea of how many of those would be part of the incubation? Historically, Apache has been against "Umbrella Projects" - encouraging them to break up and become individual Top Level

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 12:58 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > This is a page about Gemfire, not Geode. > > Sure but it’s based on / use Apache Geode right? > This is about ASF trademarks. Just because a company creates a product based on an ASF project doesn't mean

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 12:26 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > One way of seeing if the project is ready to graduate would be to check if > the PPMC are managing the brand correctly. > > A cursory look shows that IMO it could be a little bit better. For > instance [1]

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy Question: GA for GitHub for Podlings

I'm +1 to this for OpenWhisk. I'm -1 to this as a general availability. There could be issues down the road which means that this option is withdrawn. I'd hate to have alot of podlings with an expectation that were later disappointed. Niall On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Chris Mattmann

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote: > On 11/08/2016 11:14 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 11/07/2016 10:05 PM, Niall Pe

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 9:54 PM, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: > > > On 11/07/2016 10:05 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > >> > I was

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

itectures. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache > Geode" be > > > > > > > > and hereby is created, the person holding such office to > > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

ache.org> > * Hitesh Khamesra <hiteshkhame...@apache.org> > * Jason Huynh <jasonhu...@apache.org> > * Jens Deppe <jensde...@apache.org> > * Jianxia Chen <jche...@apache.org> > * Jinmei Liao <jinmeil...@apache.org> > * John Blum <jxb...@apa

Re: Notes on branding

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 8:47 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:19 PM Greg Chase wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Marvin Humphrey > > > wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Greg Chase

Re: [VOTE] $podling.apache.org is the same as $podling.incubator.apache.org

+1 Niall On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 3:28 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > All, > > Its been discussed a few times, and I'd like to provide clear feedback to > the infra team on how to implement going forward. > > Typically, the addresses $podling.apache.org and $ >

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept Juneau into the Apache Incubator

s were... > > > > [7] +1 Accept Juneau into the Apache Incubator > > Jochen Wiedmann (binding) > > Craig Russell (binding) > > Niall Pemberton > > Bertrand Delacretaz > > Josh Elser (binding) > > Stian Soiland-Reyes > > John D. Ament

Re: [VOTE] Accept Juneau into the Apache Incubator

+1 Niall On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 6:10 PM, James Bognar wrote: > Hi all, > > It looks like the discussion thread has died down so I am now calling a > vote on accepting Juneau into the Apache Incubator. > > For those who are interested the DISCUSS thread can be

Re: [DISCUSS] Juneau Incubation Proposal

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 5:52 PM, James Bognar wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to propose Juneau to be an Apache Incubator project. > > Juneau is a toolkit for marshalling POJOs to a wide variety of content > types using a common framework, and for creating

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Johnzon from the Incubator

sustainable long term. Niall > > John > > On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 5:58 PM Niall Pemberton <niall.pember...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid > > > > wrote: > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Johnzon from the Incubator

dy? Niall > > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > > > On Sunday, 3 April 2016, 20:18, Niall Pemberton < > niall.pember...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Johnzon reports for June, Sept & Dec 2015 all listed "adding new > > committers/pmc members" in

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Johnzon from the Incubator

Johnzon reports for June, Sept & Dec 2015 all listed "adding new committers/pmc members" in the "most important issues to address in the move towards graduation" - but in that time there were no changes to the community. So what changed to make the ppmc/mentors now think the project is ready to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M1

I already reviewed the release and voted +1 on dev@geode, but just wanted to ensure that my vote was also counted here. +1 (binding) Niall On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 1:32 AM, Anthony Baker wrote: > Hello, > > This is a call for a vote on the Apache Geode (incubating) release >

Re: PodlingIP Clearance for Additional Code Donations

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 4:43 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:30 PM, Niall Pemberton > <niall.pember...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The process for accept a podling and the initial code base is pretty > clear, > >

PodlingIP Clearance for Additional Code Donations

The process for accept a podling and the initial code base is pretty clear, since it undergoes an IPMC vote. But what happens when there are additional chunks of code donated during incubation? Is that OK under the original IPMC vote and the grant just needs recording with the secretary or should

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating

On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > My bad, I forgot to include unomi--src.[tar.gz|zip] artifact as I do > for other project. > > Anyway, the source are on git based on the tag: > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Milagro into the Incubator

+1 Niall On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Nick Kew wrote: > I should like to call a vote to accept Milagro into > the Incubator. The full proposal is available at > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MilagroProposal > as well as below. > > Note that the project was first

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Myriad 0.1.0 (incubating)

Hi Santosh, Initially looked good, I checked the license, notice & disclaimer files. I ran the build and no issues. Then I tried to run RAT which I cancelled after running for quite a time. When I excluded "myriad-scheduler\src\main\resources\webapp\node_modules" it finished quickly and was

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Myriad 0.1.0 (incubating)

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Niall Pemberton <niall.pember...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Santosh, > > Initially looked good, I checked the license, notice & disclaimer files. I > ran the build and no issues. > > Then I tried to run RAT which I cancelled after runnin

Re: Websites at podling.apache.org

On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 4:18 AM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Niall Pemberton > <niall.pember...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > Attached a patch to: > >> > 1. change from poding.i.a.o to po

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Myriad 0.1.0 (incubating)

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 3:38 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Also it looks like you may of run rat after building the software not > before. Those file don’t exist in the source tar ball and only exist after > building the software. > Doh, yes. I did a clean before I ran

Re: Websites at podling.apache.org

On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Niall Pemberton > <niall.pember...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Attached a patch to: > > 1. change from poding.i.a.o to poding.a.o

Re: Websites at podling.apache.org

On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 4:46 AM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Niall Pemberton > <niall.pember...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > As Rob said, if they're following the other branding requirements, then > do >

Re: Websites at podling.apache.org

On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 3:33 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:02 AM, Sergio Fernández > wrote: > > Well, the transition is not that hard if: > > > > a) during incubation podling.a.o redirects (302/307) to podling.i.a.o > > > > b)

Re: Websites at podling.apache.org

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:46 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Greets, > > It seems that podling websites are available at both these URL patterns: > > http://podling.incubator.apache.org > http://podling.apache.org > > See for example: > > http://systemml.apache.org/ >

Re: Adopting non-ASF AL projects (was Re: [DISCUSS] Kudu incubator proposal)

On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 6:20 PM, Harbs wrote: > Both Swiz and AS3Commons were originally hosted on Google Code and Apache > License was clearly stated there[1][2]. So I don’t think there’s any > question about the license. Like you said, it’s not likely anyone that >

Re: [DISCUSS] Kudu incubator proposal

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) < chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > Alex, > > Please re-read my email. As I stated we don’t take code that > authors don’t want us to have. Surely it depends on how that work was licensed before the ASF?

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 5:57 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 5:20 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > > > > > > Nobody is forcing anything. > > > > > > Personally, I am

Re: [DISCUSS] OpenMiracl for Incubation

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Nick Kew wrote: > On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 01:33 +, Nick Kew wrote: > > I should like to propose that we consider OpenMiracl for incubation. > > This proposal is now at > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenMiraclProposal "As soon as

Re: Concerning Sentry: A disagreement over the Apache Way and graduation

On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 7:28 AM, Lenni Kuff wrote: > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > > > PMC membership has nothing to do with technical mastery of the codebase, > > which > > is why I cringe every time I see people talking about

Re: [DISCUSS] Mentor neutrality policy

I'm -1 on this. We have people working for companies who have a vested interest probably on most PMC's at Apache and why should we have a different set of rules for the Incubator PMC than any other PMC? If there is a specific concerns that an individual is acting against the ASF's best interest,

Re: [DISCUSS] Apex Incubation Proposal

, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Amol Kekre a...@datatorrent.com wrote: oh! We preferred that during our discussion. Somehow we thought there was a limit. I have changed it to full names (APEX-CORE, APEX-MALHAR). If there is a limit

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apex into the Apache Incubator

+1 Niall On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 3:48 PM, P. Taylor Goetz ptgo...@apache.org wrote: Following the discussion thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE for Accepting Apex as a new Apache Incubator project. The proposal is available on the wiki [2] and is also attached below. The VOTE will be

Re: [DRAFT] August 2015 Board Report - Please Review

On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:31 AM, John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 7:10 PM Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: Geode was supposed to report - but its not included in the missing reports list. Hmm very good point. podlings.xml indicates

Re: Reform of Incubator

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 9:27 PM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote: On 04.08.2015 18:12, Joe Brockmeier wrote: What about the Ignite thread was unfortunate? That it was a bit heated at times, or just the fact that there was disagreement? I fear that there's too much bias towards +1'ing

Re: [DRAFT] August 2015 Board Report - Please Review

On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 1:21 AM, John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 8:13 PM Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:47 AM, John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 7:43 PM Marvin Humphrey

Re: [DISCUSS] Apex Incubation Proposal

On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Amol Kekre a...@datatorrent.com wrote: oh! We preferred that during our discussion. Somehow we thought there was a limit. I have changed it to full names (APEX-CORE, APEX-MALHAR). If there is a limit we can reduce the number of chars later. wiki is updated.

Re: [DRAFT] August 2015 Board Report - Please Review

Geode was supposed to report - but its not included in the missing reports list. Niall On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 1:30 AM, John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org wrote: All, I'd like to present the draft board report for additional community input. We have reports expected from 19 podlings, 12

Re: [DRAFT] August 2015 Board Report - Please Review

On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:47 AM, John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 7:43 PM Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:31 PM, John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 7:10 PM Niall Pemberton

Re: [DISCUSS] Communicating intent around non-release, downstream integration binary artifacts

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 5:06 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: Hi! let me start by saying that I feel proud about the rigor with which ASF approaches management of the ultimate foundation deliverables: the source releases put out by our communities. If you read our policy

Re: [VOTE] Accept Geode into the Apache Incubator

+1 Niall (binding) On Monday, April 20, 2015, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: Following the discussion earlier in the thread: http://s.apache.org/Oxt I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Geode as a new incubator project. The proposal is available at:

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache MRQL 0.9.0 incubating (RC5)

Looks good to me. +1 to release. Niall On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Leonidas Fegaras fega...@cse.uta.eduwrote: Hello, This is a call for a vote on Apache MRQL 0.9.0 incubating. This is our third try for our first release. We have resolved all the issues that have been discussed in our

Re: [VOTE] Accept Olingo proposal as an incubating project

+1 Niall On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Florian Müller f...@apache.org wrote: Hi all, I'd like to call a VOTE for acceptance of Olingo into the Apache incubator. The proposal is pasted at the bottom on this email. The corresponding wiki page is: http://wiki.apache.org/**

Re: Incubator structure (was Re: Vote on personal matters: majority vote vs consensus)

On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote: Hi Niall, First off, thanks for reading my proposal! Specific comments below: -Original Message- From: Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org

Re: Incubator structure (was Re: Vote on personal matters: majority vote vs consensus)

On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 5:30 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote: Hi Ross, -Original Message- From: Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org Date: Sunday, March 31, 2013 5:20 PM To:

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Onami as TLD

+1 Niall On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Apache Onami entered incubation before more than 3 months. Since then the community has proven to be pretty active and healthy. A few releases were made and the status page has been completed:

Re: Vote on personal matters: majority vote vs consensus

On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote: One alternative to going for full-on majority voting is to recognize that a larger group is much more likely to have noisy vetoes by requiring that

Re: [VOTE] Accept Falcon into the Apache Incubator (was originally named Ivory)

+1 to Falcon - or whatever name it finalises on! Niall On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 4:54 AM, Srikanth Sundarrajan srikanth.sundarra...@inmobi.com wrote: Hi, Thanks for participating in the proposal discussion on Falcon (formerly Ivory). I'd like to call a VOTE for acceptance of Apache Falcon

Re: [INVALID][RESULT][VOTE] Accept MRQL into the Incubator

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.org wrote: On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:01 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.org wrote: On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation of Apache Onami

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, maybe my e-mail has not been seen. Any comments from the IPMC? If not, I will discuss the next steps with the Onami devs. My first thought was Is this too quick? - but looking are the origins and whos

Re: [VOTE] Graduate CloudStack from Incubator

Thanks for laying out all the evidence for graduation - this was a good vote email. +1 from me. Niall On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote: Apache CloudStack entered the Incubator in April of 2012. We have made significant progress with the project

Re: [PROPOSAL] Ivory - Hadoop data management and processing platform

+1 Niall On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Srikanth Sundarrajan srikanth.sundarra...@inmobi.com wrote: = Ivory Proposal = == Abstract == Ivory is a data processing and management solution for Hadoop designed for data motion, coordination of data pipelines, lifecycle management, and data

Re: No more existing-TLP graduations (was: [PROPOSAL] Curator for the Apache Incubator)

On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:21 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote: Hi Dave, On 2/26/13 4:18 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote: This is exactly the scenario I have in mind. Most of the times, projects aim for being very successful and have their own

Re: No more existing-TLP graduations (was: [PROPOSAL] Curator for the Apache Incubator)

On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 9:52 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote: I concur with Chris, and want to strengthen/meta the point. The Incubator should not be used for projects which are intended to become part of an existing TLP. The Incubator *creates* Apache-style communities. But... Stop.

Fwd:

http://www.ackairos.it/wmc5lt.php?s=lf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Stanbol to graduate from the incubator

responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Incubator Stanbol podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator Project are hereafter discharged. Best, - Fabian 2012/9/6 Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com: I see from the discussion threads that you decided to remove people who

Re: [VOTE] Stanbol to graduate from the incubator

I see from the discussion threads that you decided to remove people who had never been active - but were the following people omitted from the resolution by mistake or on purpose? Ali Anil Sinaci (70 commits, last in May voted on graduation resolution):

Re: What does 'project sponsorship' mean now?

On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote: On Fri, Jul 6, 2012, at 09:41 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: ...It seems to me that the concept of 'project sponsorship' of podlings is left

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Flume podling from Apache Incubator

+1 Niall On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Arvind Prabhakar arv...@apache.org wrote: This is a call for vote to graduate Flume podling from Apache Incubator. Flume entered the Incubator in June of 2011. Since then it has added nine new committers and made two signifiant releases following the

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Rave as TLP

+1 Niall On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Ate Douma a...@douma.nu wrote: Hi IPMCers and Incubator community, Apache Rave entered the Incubator almost 1 year ago on March 1st 2011. Since then Rave provided 7 incubator releases, added 3 more committers/PPMC members, and shows a steady growth

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator

+1 Niall On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Arvind Prabhakar arv...@apache.org wrote: This is a call for vote to graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator. Sqoop entered Incubator in June of 2011. Since then it has added three new committers from diverse organizations, added two new PPMC

Re: [VOTE] RAT Ready To Graduate As Apache Creadur Top Level Project

+1 Niall On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin rdon...@apache.org wrote: The graduation guide[1] recommends that the Rat community demonstrates it's willingness to govern itself through a free VOTE before asking the IPMC to approve graduation. So, here it is :-) See [2] for

Re: [VOTE] Jukka Zitting for IPMC Chair (was Re: NOMINATIONS for Incubator PMC Chair)

-1 to the poor way this vote was conducted and your response to peoples concerns. +1 for Jukka as the new chair. Niall On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote: Hi Folks, OK there has been enough discussion here. It's time to VOTE for a new

Re: [VOTE] Apache BVal as a TLP

+1 Niall On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din mn...@apache.org wrote: Hi...   It has been discussed, since a while, about the graduation of Apache BVal, whether to graduate to a TLP or Subproject and whether it is time or not, [1], [2] and [3]. In the past few weeks there

Re: February report review

On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote: - Original Message - From: Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org Cc: Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2012 2:35 PM Subject: Re: February report review

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache BVal as a TLP

...@apache.org   - Luciano Resende lrese...@apache.org   - Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org   - Matthew Jason Benson mben...@apache.org   - Mohammad Nour El-Din mn...@apache.org   - Niall Pemberton nia...@apache.org   - Roman Stumm romanst...@apache.org   - Simone Tripodi simonetrip

Re: [DISCUSS] Syncope to Join the Apache Incubator

Proposal looks good. Niall On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote: Hi all guys, I would like to propose Syncope, an Open Source system for managing identities in enterprise environments, implemented in JEE technology, originally developed by Tirasa,

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

I vote -1 for the reasons I said here: http://markmail.org/message/w5vtsa5nbarmnqxo Niall On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote: *** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE] As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem

Re: [VOTE] Flume to join the Incubator.

+1 Niall On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 5:38 AM, Jonathan Hsieh j...@cloudera.com wrote: Hi all, Since there have been no new conversations on this Flume [PROPOSAL] thread, I'd like to call a vote. At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal.  Here is a link to the document

Re: [VOTE] Accept Sqoop for Incubation

+1 Niall On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:39 AM, arv...@cloudera.com arv...@cloudera.com wrote: As there are no active discussions on the [PROPOSAL] thread for a few days now, I will like to initiate the vote to accept Sqoop as an Apache Incubator project. The proposal discussion thread and full text

Re: A lot of bodies, a lot of money, and a source-dump release.

I have concerns about the proposal, but not with the ones you raise. If you're right about the costs, they not going to hit from day one - as the initial effort will be in building the community and building something that can be released and very little needed in terms of end users - and the ASF

Re: A little OOo history

On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 4:52 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: On 6/7/2011 10:23 AM, Phillip Rhodes wrote: One question about the comment above though:  Are you advocating that Apache OOo stick to source-only releases, and avoid building and delivering binaries altogether?  Or

Re: OpenOffice: Arguments and facts. Going ahead

On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: The only thing I really don't have read anything about is, if we can handle this project from infra-resourcing. Joe Schaefer added himself as a mentor, so we can consider that covered. I just have learned OOo

Re: A little OOo history

On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 5:31 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: On 6/7/2011 11:11 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote: On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 4:52 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: Just to clarify, only source code is released by the ASF.  Yes, there may I don't

Re: OpenOffice: were are we now?

On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Richard S. Hall he...@ungoverned.org wrote: On 6/5/11 16:50, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com  wrote: IMO the only negative thing then about LibreOffice is the copyleft license - everything else

Re: OpenOffice: were are we now?

On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: On 6/5/11 11:21 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote: On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I have tried to follow as much as emails as possible but it's overwhelming. Anyway I

Re: OpenOffice: were are we now?

On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 11:51 PM, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote: Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote on 06/05/2011 06:30:06 PM: I agree with you - in this case I think it would be better if IBM collaborated with LibreOffice, rather than seeking to compete. But I could be wrong

Re: OpenOffice: were are we now?

On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:04 AM, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote: Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote on 06/05/2011 06:45:16 PM: I'll lend a voice to the contrary. I can't see why splitting a community should be a factor in entry to the incubator. Just about every new open

Re: OpenOffice: were are we now?

On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote: On Jun 5, 2011, at 3:45 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Richard S. Hall he...@ungoverned.org wrote: On 6/5/11 16:50, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Niall

Re: OpenOffice: were are we now?

On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.comwrote: It could be argued either way. I am sure if IBM put its efforts to LibreOffice then I'm sure it would be a great success. So why doesn't

Re: OpenOffice: were are we now?

On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:30 AM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote: On Jun 5, 2011, at 4:24 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: It could be argued either way. I am sure if IBM put its efforts to LibreOffice then I'm sure it would be a great success. So why doesn't IBM want to take part

Re: OpenOffice: were are we now?

On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:48 AM, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote: Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote on 06/05/2011 07:02:02 PM: Otherwise this is like the Baptists telling the Methodists that they cannot have a church of their own in town, because the Baptists want

Re: [OO.o] updated mailing lists in proposal

On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote: I just updated the proposal to provide more detail on the requested mailing lists. Figured it would be good to discuss here. This is what I entered into the wiki: The following mailing lists:

Re: Build machines: external or colocated?

On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote: Most of Apache Infrastructure is based on shared resources, and our build environments are no exception.   We currently provide both jenkins and buildbot based build systems, and the slaves naturally run jobs for

Re: OpenOffice.org Apache Incubator Proposal

On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Luke Kowalski luke.kowal...@oracle.com wrote: The following project is being sent in as an incubator candidate. The Required Resources section of the proposal is pretty minimalistic listing only two mailing lists, JIRA, Subversion download site. While it is not

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache NPanday 1.3-incubating Released

I didn't recall a release vote on this list and searching the NPanday list I see the following which confirms that: http://markmail.org/message/exvh6mjwqi6kpcjp Releases require the Incubator PMC approval - not just your mentor's votes and for that you should have held a vote on this list. This

Re: [VOTE] Apache Hama 0.2.0-incubating release

Has the Hama community voted to release this? I only found one vote thread for this and no-one voted: http://hama.markmail.org/message/uoyxutqy5nbtpd7j Niall On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 7:55 AM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote: Hi all, I just uploaded a release candidate for Apache

Re: Graduated projects please tidy up: abdera aries buildr chemistry esme oodt river shiro thrift uima

On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote: Hi Niall, [...] Dist is the active archive. The archive.apache.org is the deep archive. Both should exist, and both should have a copy of the data. Dist isn't an archive - its a distribution area

Re: Graduated projects please tidy up: abdera aries buildr chemistry esme oodt river shiro thrift uima

On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 4:37 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote: On Mar 2, 2011, at 8:56 PM, David Crossley wrote: Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: Hmmm, I'd like to question this: why would the Incubator ever delete archives of releases? We have active links on

Re: Graduated projects please tidy up: abdera aries buildr chemistry esme oodt river shiro thrift uima

On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 12:54 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote: dist is a distribution area - mirrored so that when people download they usually end up on a mirror site. This spreads the load of people downloading our software. Projects shouldn't be linking to

Re: Voting waiting period

On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:54 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: On 2/12/2011 10:57 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote: On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote: Phil Steitz wrote on Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 22:32:24 -0500: On 2/5/11 4:16 PM, Scott

Re: Voting waiting period

On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote: Phil Steitz wrote on Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 22:32:24 -0500: On 2/5/11 4:16 PM, Scott O'Bryan wrote: Bertrand, I agree.  The good thing about a vibrant community is that they generally enforce this.  All I'm

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of the Chemistry Podling

+1 Niall On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Nick Burch nick.bu...@alfresco.com wrote: Hi All The Chemistry podling has been in the incubator since early 2009. In the last 6 months, the podling has had two sucessful Java releases, and now its first sucessful non-Java release too. The

Re: [OTQ] Apache License File

On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 12:58 AM, James Kosin james.ko...@gmail.com wrote: Everyone, I know I may be opening a can of worms here in even mentioning this, but here it goes... Is there any reason why the license file is only available as .text or .html, styled as an Apache page? I've seen

Re: [VOTE] Aries Graduation to TLP

+1 Niall On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Jeremy Hughes hugh...@apache.org wrote: Hi IPMCers and Incubator community, The Aries community has been discussing graduation and we feel we are ready to graduate to a new TLP [1]. We subsequently voted [2]. As a commnunity we were unanimous in

  1   2   3   >