ankitkumar2711 at apache dot org
* Arvind Prabhakar arvind at apache dot org
* Henry Saputra hsaputra at apache dot org
* Juan Jose van der Linden delostilos at apache dot org
* Kasper Sørensen kaspersor at apache dot org
* Matt Franklin mfanklin at apache dot org
* Noah Slater nslater at apache dot org
/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
--
Noah Slater
https://twitter.com/nslater
- The shape of your community
For young projects, I would recommend being strict, and then loosening up
if you start to have problems.
On Friday, 26 September 2014, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
As the primary author of the CouchDB bylaws, I will weigh in here.
Agree with Ross
Brockmeier
j...@zonker.net
Twitter: @jzb
http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
--
Noah Slater
)
Suresh Marru (sma...@apache.org)
Chip Childers (chipchild...@apache.org)
Joe Brockmeier (j...@apache.org)
Noah Slater (nsla...@apache.org)
Nandana Mihindukulasooriya (nand...@apache.org)
Isuru Perera (is...@apache.org)
Reka Thirunavakurussu
.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
--
Noah Slater
https://twitter.com/nslater
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr
I endorse it. If I don't,
it looks like I am inattentive.
I pinged about getting the report done last week, and only just
noticed it was added to the wiki without an announcement.
Thanks,
--
Noah Slater
https://twitter.com/nslater
. Though certainly possible I accidentally deleted a thread
about it.
On 8 April 2014 13:11, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
If a podling you are mentoring completes its report late, and there
are sections
, that is, with comments, if there's things you need to say.
Upayavira
+1 to that. And its still over a week till the baord meeting and lots of
mentors active in Stratos so its not like there are surprises.
...ant
--
Noah Slater
https://twitter.com/nslater
Okay, all sorted. Thanks for the feedback!
On 8 April 2014 14:46, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
The deadline is tonight, and the report is supposed to be submitted tomorrow.
On 8 April 2014 14:33, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Upayavira u
Congrats!
On 21 January 2014 13:05, Ankit Kumar ak.ankitku...@gmail.com wrote:
HI All,
The vote for Apache Metamodel 4.0.0-incubating is closed. The vote passes
with 4(+1) votes.
Following IPMC votes were received.
*+1*
hsaputra
mfranklin
arvind
nslater
Regards
Ankit
--
Noah
of by Ankit's release procedure, or do we need to do
something more for the distribution part of the release?
2014/1/22 Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org
Congrats!
On 21 January 2014 13:05, Ankit Kumar ak.ankitku...@gmail.com wrote:
HI All,
The vote for Apache Metamodel 4.0.0-incubating
-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
--
Noah Slater
https://twitter.com/nslater
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
/%3CCALuGr6aPmPwKgGb5ft%3Dy_BDKPwBKbS7g7QR%2BS6YHAkVg6_nH%2Bg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
Please vote on releasing this package as Apache MetaModel 4.0.0-incubating.
The vote is open until 16th January 2014 14:00 CET and passes if a
majority of at least 3 IPMC votes are cast.
Regards
Ankit
--
Noah
is up on:
zip: http://dl.refuge.io/rcouch-0.7.1.tar.gz
sha: 332b09635d9ca55122ee02903984808f183a4674
The IP Clearance document:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/public/trunk/content/ip-clearance/couchdb-rcouch.xml?view=cocontent-type=text%2Fplain
Thanks!
Jan
--
--
Noah
Nice. Thanks Marvin!
On 3 July 2013 06:00, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@oracle.com wrote:
Marvin,
Nice work. +1
Craig
On Jul 2, 2013, at 6:59 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Hey Marvin,
Did you get anywhere
. That way, people looking for specific
information about current practices will not have to wade through
historical information.
Eric
On 7/2/13 6:59 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Hey Marvin,
Did you get anywhere
Woop! Thanks Bob! +1
On 26 June 2013 13:55, Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote:
Cloudant has donated the source code artifact detailed at [1] to the ASF.
This email is to request lazy consensus from the IPMC for the IP
clearance of this donation.
B
[1]
being filed that details the contribution?
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Noah Slater [mailto:nsla...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 06:03 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [IP CLEARANCE] BigCouch
Woop! Thanks Bob! +1
On 26 June 2013 13:55, Robert
2013 17:35, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Ah, I see what you are saying.
I believe this might just be some unfortunate wording in the IP Clearance
template.
This:
Check and make sure that the files that have been donated have been
updated to reflect the new ASF copyright.
Might
has no power to sue
for infringement of copyright in the contributed works, nor any patent
infringement related to the use of the contributed works.)
-Original Message-
From: Noah Slater [mailto:nsla...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 08:14 AM
To: general
Copyright to Licensing too.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Robert Newson [mailto:rnew...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 09:36 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org; dennis.hamil...@acm.org
Cc: Noah Slater
Subject: Re: [IP CLEARANCE] BigCouch
Dennis,
I'm following
Woot. Thanks Ross!
On 20 June 2013 12:26, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
This vote is now closed. The Vote passed.
Podling committers can start the process of setting up the project [1]
(note some actions require the support of your mentors).
There are no -1 votes and
Ross, thanks for bringing this up! I'm happy to be a part of this
experiment.
On 13 June 2013 09:13, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
Better yes - required before we can vote - no. My reasoning is
that WSO2 have already agreed they will use a different name if VP
Branding
*
Chris Mattmann*
Noah Slater*
Rahul Sharma
Ankit Kumar
Christian Grobmeier*
Arvind Prabhakar*
Kasper Sorensen
Noah Slater*
Manuel Van den Berg
Joe Brockmeier*
Suresh Marru*
Ted Dunning*
Rich Bowen
Alan Cabrera*
Marcel Offermans*
Alex Karasulu*
0s:
None
-1s:
None
This means
On 13 June 2013 11:21, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
This is the root of why CouchDB has a problem today. I believe you a
projecting that problem and its cause onto a different issue here.
This is not about allowing WSO2 an exception to the existing policy.
It is about
the discussions have calmed down so if no one object I will
start the VOTE thread sometime today.
Thanks,
Henry
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 2:24 AM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Great. I assume that if someone is eager to join as a mentor and the vote
is already done, we can add
I would be interested in mentoring this project. (I am a CouchDB PMC
member.)
On Tuesday, 28 May 2013, Henry Saputra wrote:
Dear ASF members,
We would like to propose MetaModel for the incubator.
Matt Franklin will be the Champion for this project and the proposal draft
is available at:
Sure!
On Friday, 31 May 2013, Henry Saputra wrote:
Awesome! Looks like perfect match too!
Can I also add you as initial contributors?
- Henry
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
I would be interested in mentoring this project. (I am a CouchDB PMC
Dear community,
I am pleased to announce that Joe Brockmeier joins the Incubator PMC.
Please join me in extending a warm welcome to Joe!
On behalf of the Incubator PMC,
--
NS
Hey Marvin,
Did you get anywhere with this?
Thanks,
On 30 March 2013 15:39, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks Greg. Sane advice. I'll add this to my todo list and see if I can
come up with a patch
On 7 May 2013 16:55, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
I guess that could be automated (grep through mail
archives for mentor email addresses each month), but until that
happens[...]
This could be done in a one-off fashion with a simple sh pipe. I'm not fond
of to addressing social problems
Not really. It's a heartbeat/health-check like any other distributed,
unreliable system. I was tempted to say it's a social implementation of
STONITH, but that might send the wrong message. ;)
On 8 May 2013 00:53, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
On 7 May 2013 08:56, Bertrand
for the
whole problem...)
On 3 April 2013 09:29, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
As far as I understand your comment, Ant, you mean to say that he problem
is that there is too much variation in opinion and approach
As far as I understand your comment, Ant, you mean to say that he problem
is that there is too much variation in opinion and approach. (Primarily, I
understand, in relation to releases.)
This doesn't seem related to the size of the PMC, to me. We're always going
to need a large pool of people
Dear community,
I am pleased to announce that David Nalley joins the Incubator PMC.
Please join me in extending a warm welcome to David!
On behalf of the Incubator PMC,
--
NS
Welcome, Henry!
On 2 April 2013 16:53, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi All,
Please join me in welcoming Henry Saputra to the Incubator PMC.
Henry, welcome! Please feel free to share a bit about yourself.
Cheers,
Chris
ComDev could work to attract volunteers. I am sure there are more than a
few people on the Incubator dev@ list at the moment who might consider
moving over here to work on process and policy documentation...
On 1 April 2013 19:19, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013
Thanks Greg. Sane advice. I'll add this to my todo list and see if I can
come up with a patch for the docs.
On 28 March 2013 06:50, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
...
I don't believe we should force an announce@ list
I really like this idea, Marvin. If you're gonna run with it, I'll take a
step back.
On 30 March 2013 15:39, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks Greg. Sane advice. I'll add this to my todo list and see
Bertrand, yes, I am not sold on the idea of doing it by default. But
perhaps sort of advisory, highlighting it as an option, and giving reasons
why it might be a good idea for some projects?
What would I have to do to add that? If I prepare a patch to the docs,
would it be CTR or RTC?
On 27
On 27 March 2013 16:28, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
Do the general announce list lag behind because there are individual lists
?
I see no reason why they would.
On 27 March 2013 16:31, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
The minute that is in the guides, I'm
Putting it in policy is probably as close as we can get to automation. ;)
On 27 March 2013 17:23, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
So we just set out a policy for podlings to follow that says something
like
On 27 March 2013 18:37, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
My personal experience: There are a few people registered to
annou...@apache.org, but there is a low registration rate for the
respective subproject lists. At least not for most projects.
That's to be expected, though, right? We
Incubator,
Is there a reason we don't recommend podlings create an announce@ list by
default?
I am under the impression that having a low-volume, high-signal
announcement channel is generally beneficial to most projects that try it.
And comes with almost zero Infra overhead.
I had a chat about
seems like too much for little gain.
The users list should suffice for announcements (with [ANN] in the subject).
-JZ
On Mar 26, 2013, at 4:05 AM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Incubator,
Is there a reason we don't recommend podlings create an announce@ list
by
default
Yep. Obviously, I'm aware we have a foundation-wide announce list. :)
It's not very helpful for people who are only interested in one or two
projects, however.
If I am using Hadoop, and only care about knowing about new Hadoop releases
or security disclosures, I do not want to:
a) subscribe to
are useful.
On 26 March 2013 17:44, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Yep. Obviously, I'm aware we have a foundation-wide announce list. :)
It's not very helpful for people who are only interested in one or two
in the project-level thread are:
* Mohammad Nour El-Din (IPMC/mentor) [7]
* Noah Slater (IPMC/mentor) [8]
* Alex Karasulu (IPMC/mentor) [9]
* Brett Porter (IPMC/mentor) [10]
Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 Graduate Apache CloudStack from Apache Incubator
[ ] +0 Indifferent to graduation status
Thanks for the clarification Roy.
On 31 October 2012 05:29, Roy T. Fielding field...@gbiv.com wrote:
[generic incubator comments -- nothing specific to CloudStack] ...
On Oct 29, 2012, at 8:01 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
On 29 October 2012 14:48, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com
wrote
have already been cast (on cloudstack-dev):
+1 (PPMC / binding)
* Jim Jagielski (mentor)
* Olivier Lamy (mentor)
* Brett Porter (mentor)
* Daniel Kulp (mentor)
* Noah Slater (mentor)
There were no -1 or +0 votes cast.
Instructions for Validating and Testing the artifacts can be found here
Uh, would be handy if I included my vote. ;)
An emphatic +1
On 30 October 2012 19:51, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Sig: OK
Hashes: OK
RAT: OK
Source: OK
Build: OK
Tests: OK
(Based on my voting from yesterday during the project vote.)
(See my post to this list yesterday about
On 29 October 2012 14:48, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks for following up Chip. Though I do just want to clarify one
misconception.
On 29 October 2012 13:21, Chip Childers chip.child
On 29 October 2012 15:13, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
I'll try to be more clear next time. I'm holding the vote open
specifically because of this outstanding question, *regardless* of the
current tally. That's what I was expressing.
Understood. I suspected we were on
Nice summary Bertrand.
On 29 October 2012 15:22, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.orgwrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
...Waf is a packaging utility, used to create RPMs and DEBs. Work is
currently ongoing to remove it (and
Thanks for investigating this, Chip.
I am happy with us proceeding, but would caution us to think about
addressing or documenting this in a later release.
I'd say wait until tomorrow to see if anyone else objects then wrap up the
vote.
Let's ship this thing!
On 29 October 2012 16:21, Chip
Hey,
We're just voting on our first release, and I spotted this file in the root
of the source:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=waf;hb=HEAD
It seems to be a sort of hybrid source/binary file. Very strange.
Can we ship this?
Thanks,
--
NS
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.comwrote:
1) send email to him and his PMC fellows, referencing this thread, as
evidence that key signing is nice but optional.
This seems like the most sensible option.
AFAIK, signed keys have never been required to sign
It had to be done, given this thread's epic proportions... ;)
[image: Identity]
http://xkcd.com/1121/
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm offering this discussion here, but it might need to go elsewhere
if it goes anywhere at all.
It seems to me
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
nour.moham...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm, didn't notice that thread before, but still, as Joe pointed,
INFRA should give their opinion about it.
Does Daniel's original email not qualify for that? ;)
--
NS
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Nick Kew n...@apache.org wrote:
You have to extend that assumption not only to our infrastructure but to
every proxy that might come between us and a user, and that might
substitute a trojan along with the trojan's own SHA1.
The same reasoning holds for the
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 9:48 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 October 2012 02:39, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Greg Stein wrote on Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 21:31:30 -0400:
Not too much. We still instruct users take the signatures and verify
them against
AM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
If you know the person, it adds something that you don't get.
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org wrote:
What, precisely, does a video call actually provide?
The point of meeting in person is to verify photo IDs
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
I have friends who live far away. I know them well. I don't know their
key fingerprint.
If we send emails or if we text back and forth I not clear that it is
them. If I have a video conference and the hold up the
I've said it already in this thread, but I will say it one last time before
I drop it. Archiving video provides zero benefits, beyond the human to
human connection of seeing what somebody looks like. It provides no way to
establish identity or ownership of email/keys that email does not already
Most people develop their own key signing policy and publish it. Or
organisations as a whole do, and ask their members to adhere to it.
Something which we might want to consider formalising.
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.comwrote:
Just to be clear, I don't
done a ton of
work documenting and verifying release signing and keys:
https://people.apache.org/~**henkp/trust/https://people.apache.org/~henkp/trust/
- Shane
On 10/8/2012 6:37 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
Found one... Just poking around manually...
J. Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org
http
, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.comwrote:
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org wrote:
1. The key owner convinces the signer that the identity in the UID is
indeed their own identity by whatever evidence the signer is willing to
accept as convincing. Usually
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.comwrote:
There's another side to this, which I would derisively label, 'so
what'? How does it help a user to see that my key is signed by 27 of
my fellow Apache contributors, if the user has never met any of us,
and has
This is an important point.
Debian has a complete toolset and guidelines for managing this.
http://www.debian.org/events/keysigning
To quote:
People should only sign a key under at least two conditions:
1. The key owner convinces the signer that the identity in the UID is
indeed their own
8, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
There's another side to this, which I would derisively label, 'so
what
Caveat: But I do think that if we do have a key signing guide (and I think
we should) then it should be strict about our standards. (i.e. when and
when not to sign somebody's key. Basic QA on what sort of trust we're
trying to build here.)
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 11:15 PM, Noah Slater nsla
I don't know how to check that. Heh. Would be interested in giving it a
shot. Are there tools to look up graphs?
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.comwrote:
Let's try a little statistically-invalid experiment of sample size
one. The last time I had a key
Found one... Just poking around manually...
J. Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindexsearch=0x858FC4C4F43856A3
Signed by Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindexsearch=0x132E49D4E41EDC7E
Signed by Marcus Crafter
CloudStack dev@ should be copied in on this thread.
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.orgwrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Sheng Liang sheng.li...@citrix.com
wrote:
...
1. When shall we redirect cloudstack.org to the Apache project page?
Hey,
The CloudStack dev@ list is... VERY high traffic. A lot of that are JIRA
notifications.
Can we, per Incubator policy, set up an issues@ list? (And
STRONGLY encourage committers to subscribe to it.)
I have not checked with the community to see if they want this, but I want
to understand if
at 1:19 AM, Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org wrote:
I had seen the earlier reminder, but had not made a calendar event for
it.
So when the 24 hour reminder came in, along with a quick draft that was
posted before I checked my email, I felt a little blindsided. Would be
nice
to have
We have a situation with CloudStack where we have some jars that we do not
know our distribution rights. If it turns out that we do not have the right
to distribute them (Apache compatibility aside) what course of action
should we take?
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk
Hey,
I'm trying to sign off on a board report, but I don't have edit permission.
Can someone add me to the wiki Contributor Group?
Thanks,
--
NS
Can we please adjust this system to send the notice out two days prior?
As it stands, this notice gives the project a single day to prepare the
board report. As it happens, I missed it, because I didn't check my mail
yesterday. Which is annoying, because I had some comments on what was
proposed.
Heh. NoahSlater :P
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:50 PM, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
Noah Slater wrote:
I'm trying to sign off on a board report, but I don't have edit
permission.
Can someone add me to the wiki Contributor Group?
If you tell us your username.
-David
Danke!
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:59 PM, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
Noah Slater wrote:
Heh. NoahSlater :P
Done.
-David
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional
, as is
customary in Apache.
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 12:15 AM, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
Noah Slater wrote:
Can we please adjust this system to send the notice out two days prior?
As it stands, this notice gives the project a single day to prepare the
board report. As it happens
Congrats!
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Steven Gill stevengil...@gmail.com wrote:
The vote has now closed. The results are:
Bertrand Delacretaz +1
Olivier Lamy + 1
Along with the 17 other +1's which can be viewed at
http://markmail.org/thread/lkgvtg3t6r3wxvwj.
The vote is
Okay, thanks. :)
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.comwrote:
Podling frequently check in dubious IP as part of initial imports, and
then clean up HEAD later. I've never seen any evidence of a more
thorough extirpation.
Hey,
It came up on the CloudStack list that we have non-OS (I don't know the
specific license, but I can find out if it's important) jars in the
repository, and some people (at least one) is downloading them from that
location for convenience.
Obviously, we're not going to ship them, and we can
directly from
version control history? Where do they find the references to their
existence there?
Noah Slater wrote on Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 22:41:53 +0100:
Hey,
It came up on the CloudStack list that we have non-OS (I don't know the
specific license, but I can find out if it's important
.
Those are the only two that jump to mind that weren't under some sort of an
open source license, but my memory might be fallible.
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org wrote:
In relation to the non-OS jars, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
I am currently downloading them from
Thanks. :)
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.namewrote:
If you've not released it and you've deleted it from HEAD of all
branches, I think you're fine.
Noah Slater wrote on Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 23:09:45 +0100:
Okay cool.
My root concern was that we have
Speaking as CouchDB's RM, I would consider missing license headers a
blocker.
Are rules more lax within the Incubator?
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
I had
Okay, thanks. :)
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org wrote:
Speaking as CouchDB's RM, I would consider missing license headers a
blocker.
Are rules more lax within the Incubator
I'm closing this thread (a bit late) with a lazy consensus. IP clearance is
complete.
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org wrote:
Anyone else? This is our first time doing this. I just wanna be sure we've
covered all bases?
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Noah
Anyone else? This is our first time doing this. I just wanna be sure we've
covered all bases?
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org wrote:
Hey,
Please review the following for IP clearance:
http://incubator.staging.apache.org/ip-clearance/couchdb-docs.html
Hey,
Please review the following for IP clearance:
http://incubator.staging.apache.org/ip-clearance/couchdb-docs.html
Thanks,
--
NS
, personal hosting scratch-pads like this are becoming more
and more common. It would be nice to have an official ASF position on it.
Thanks,
--
Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr
(without code nor community)
Not possible, because some of our contributers are not ASF committers.
There's a third way: Go to a project which might like your idea and
request a sandbox (no code but community).
There would be no sensible place to do this.
Thanks,
--
Noah Slater, http
time within the Incubator?
That said, I think there were a couple of projects that came to the
incubator without code, IIRC Photark is one of them.
Hmm, interesting.
So there's no hard and fast rule then?
Thanks,
--
Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater
similarly involved in open source projects.
I haven't looked up our docs about this, just trying to apply common sense.
Sure.
Thanks,
--
Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr
.
Thanks for all the feedback guys.
I'll work on getting a proposal together and send another message to the list.
Best,
--
Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
that we could start from scratch as a podling, and grow the code
along with the community. Is this going to be possible?
Thanks,
--
Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
