Re: [VOTE] Accept XTable into the ASF Incubator

+1 (binding) On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 11:32 PM Rakesh Radhakrishnan wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > I'm contributing to the Apache Hadoop project and mentoring Hive > contributors in my company. It's a great initiative. The project looks > interesting to me and can be really useful to the

Re: [DISCUSS] OneTable proposal

Interesting. I am available as a mentor if you are interested. On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 5:30 PM PJ Fanning wrote: > Hi Ismaël, > Could you make a request to join the Incubator PMC? ASF members will > be accepted into the PMC. It's just that podling mentors need to be > part of the PMC. >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Livy (incubating) 0.8.0 released

+annou...@apache.org +annou...@hadoop.apache.org +general@incubator.apache.org On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 2:34 PM Damon Cortesi wrote: > Hi folks, > > After a long hiatus, The Apache Livy team is proud to announce the release > of Apache Livy > 0.8.0-incubating. > > Livy is a web service that

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Livy 0.8.0-incubating (RC2)

Carrying over my vote: +1 (binding) On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 1:23 PM PJ Fanning wrote: > +1 (binding) > > I checked > * checksums and signatures > * DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, NOTICE, THIRD-PARTY files exist > * ASF headers in source files > * source builds > > I still think improvements can be made

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Livy 0.8.0-incubating (RC1)

Okay. Last release was a different group of people. Doesn't seem terribly reasonable but, @dac...@apache.org - it seems that we need to pull those JIRA into 0.8.0 and spin a new RC. On Tue, Aug 8, 2023, 11:19 PM wrote: > Hi, > > These issues were mentioned in the last release; generally,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Livy 0.8.0-incubating (RC1)

@Justin Mclean - thoughts? On Sat, Aug 5, 2023 at 11:51 AM larry mccay wrote: > @justin - I've filed the following two JIRA to > address your reported issues for release 0.8.1, if you approve. > Waiting on the status of the category X binary license issues - I know > @dac..

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Livy 0.8.0-incubating (RC1)

://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LIVY-984 On Sat, Aug 5, 2023 at 9:45 AM larry mccay wrote: > Hi Justin - > > Thanks for the review! > > Given that this is the first release since the reboot of the community, I > am wondering whether these really have to be blockers. > We can file JIRAs for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Livy 0.8.0-incubating (RC1)

Hi Justin - Thanks for the review! Given that this is the first release since the reboot of the community, I am wondering whether these really have to be blockers. We can file JIRAs for each of those issues and address them in the next release. These aren't regressions after all and there have

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Livy 0.8.0-incubating (RC1)

Carrying my vote forward from community vote. +1 On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 8:29 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > HI, > > There are GPL and LGPL licensed jars in the zip. I'm not sure but I > thought we couldn't include jars with category X licenses in our > binary distributions. >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0-rc2

ore, with the new year, the copyright statements in the NOTICE > files are now out of date as you observed. I'm assuming this will require a > new release candidate? > > Thanks, > Riley > > On 2022/12/30 23:39:13 larry mccay wrote: > > I wanted to lend a hand with the sdap 1.0.0 r

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0-rc2

I wanted to lend a hand with the sdap 1.0.0 release review and wanted to let you know that it seems a bit cumbersome to review. Perhaps my experience with other projects is limited to similar conventions, though. The fact that the src artifacts aren't under a project specific root ended up

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni graduation

great experience > building with you all. I personally believe we should free the incubator's > time and attention to concentrate on other projects. I also believe the > project is mature enough to function outside of the incubator. > > I vote +1 to graduate Tuweni from the incubator. >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni graduation

t; higher if the community leader is hard to reach or is slow to respond > to feedback and questions for lack of time." > > [1] > https://github.com/InnerSourceCommons/InnerSourcePatterns/blob/main/patterns/2-structured/dedicated-community-leader.md#forces > [2]https://innersourcecommons

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni graduation

I'm not so sure that I see this as a blocker for graduation. There was enough consensus and testing to spin and publish 14 releases. There has been healthy conversation about this very topic among the mentors and contributors on the private list. The nature of this project is that the consumption

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 2.3.1-incubating

Built from source, checked NOTICE and LICENSE files +1 On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 7:10 PM Antoine Toulme wrote: > We are short at least one vote - would anyone please be able to test out > this release and vote? > > Cheers, > > Antoine > > > On Nov 24, 2022, at 12:25 PM, Furkan KAMACI > wrote: >

[NOTICE] Adding Damon Cortesi as Apache Livy PPMC

Hi IPMC - Damon Cortesi has expressed interest in joining the revived PPMC for the Livy Podling. I will be adding them as requested and this serves as notice of our doing so. thanks! --larry

[NOTICE] Adding Shaofeng Li to PPMC for Apache Livy Podling

Hi IPMC - Shaofeng Li has expressed interest in joining the revived PPMC for the Livy Podling. I will be adding them as requested and this service as notice of our doing so. thanks! --larry

Re: [NOTICE] Adding new PPMC and Committers to Apache Livy

Please subscribe to the Livy lists as I plan to start DISCUSS threads on a couple topics to help bootstrap. We don't need to wait for everyone to be added to start the community conversations. On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 9:08 PM larry mccay wrote: > All - > > I have sent a single invitati

Re: [NOTICE] Adding new PPMC and Committers to Apache Livy

On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 4:49 AM Marco Gaido wrote: > Hi Larry, > > I also expressed my interest in still being part of the community. At > least for the thriftserver part, which I contributed and maintained. > > Thanks, > Marco > > Il giorno lun 31 ott 2022 alle ore 02:0

Re: [NOTICE] Adding new PPMC and Committers to Apache Livy

. Since we have already sent the notice, we will add you to the Livy podling roster upon receipt of your ICLAs. thanks, --larry On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 2:09 PM larry mccay wrote: > All - > > In preparing to add the members listed in this NOTICE, I came to realize > that we have a n

Re: [NOTICE] Adding new PPMC and Committers to Apache Livy

Thanks, Justin. I'll get that part moving tomorrow sometime. On Sat, Oct 29, 2022, 4:37 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > I intend to add all existing Apache committers from this list in this > thread within the next hour or so but will also follow up with the > individuals to formally invite

Re: [NOTICE] Adding new PPMC and Committers to Apache Livy

however. thanks, --larry On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 2:30 PM larry mccay wrote: > Hi Incubator - > > In an effort to revive the Livy podling [1], it is being proposed to > adjust the existing Livy PPMC by adding new members that plan to move the > project forward, remove me

[NOTICE] Adding new PPMC and Committers to Apache Livy

and that if after 72 hrs there are no objections an IPMC member would be able to make these changes. Mentors - Larry McCay, lmc...@apache.org , Cloudera - Sunil Govindan, sun...@apache.org, Cloudera - Jean-Baptiste Onofré, jbono...@apache.org, Talend - Madhawa Gunasekara

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Proposal to Revive Apache Livy Community

gt; On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 5:38 PM Marco Gaido wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I am also busy with different projects at the moment, as such I am > > more than happy if ai can help somehow, e.g. reviewing code in parts > > that I know, but I cannot allocate much bandwidth to

Re: Proposal to Revive Apache Livy Community

Great, I'll move that forward. That sounds like a NOTICE thread? On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 4:16 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Usually, the PPMC would need to vote on adding new PPMC members, but it > seems Livy no longer has 3 active PPMC members. The chair of the project > can add PMC

Re: Proposal to Revive Apache Livy Community

h to dedicate to Livy. > > > Alex Bozarth > Jupyter Architect, IBM CODAIT > GitHub: ajbozarth > > On 10/24/22, 1:41 PM, "larry mccay" wrote: > > Gentle reminder that we need to determine next steps here. > We have an updated proposal on this th

Re: Proposal to Revive Apache Livy Community

Gentle reminder that we need to determine next steps here. We have an updated proposal on this thread. Do we need a VOTE or can we move forward directly to adjusting the members, etc? Thanks! --larry On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 3:26 PM larry mccay wrote: > @Justin Mclean - any insights on n

Re: Proposal to Revive Apache Livy Community

@Justin Mclean - any insights on next steps here? On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 5:44 PM larry mccay wrote: > Very good, here is the latest revision with updated Mentors. > Sunil and I have been added to the IPMC as well. > Welcome Madhawa and thanks for stepping up as a Mentor

Re: Request to have me added as an IPMC Member

t; > > > I noticed that Justin has sent a NOTICE: > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/8ftfqgmq1tztdb6fwvmg9obckp7nbpbo > > > > > > Generally, you will be added to the IPMC in three days. > > > > > > Best, > > > tison. > > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] What to do with long incubating projects?

I've been wondering about this as well. It seems that we can have a rather mature project still incubating after a number of years. We can have active consumers relying on it but the momentum of the original project and maintainers waned. Multiple external forks have been made with the inability

Re: Proposal to Revive Apache Livy Community

to Revival: - Add new Mentors - Larry McCay, lmc...@apache.org , Cloudera - Sunil Govindan, sun...@apache.org, Cloudera - Jean-Baptiste Onofré, jbono...@apache.org, Talend - Madhawa Gunasekara, madhaw...@gmail.com, Independent - Add new

Re: Proposal to Revive Apache Livy Community

:18 PM Madhawa Gunasekara wrote: > Hi Larry, > > I'm interested in working with Livy and would like to join as a Mentor. > > Thanks, > Madhawa > > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 6:57 PM larry mccay wrote: > > > Sorry, I missed commenting on this: > > > &g

Re: Proposal to Revive Apache Livy Community

Sorry, I missed commenting on this: "There is also no concept as an emeritus PPMC member at the ASF." I assume that we can remove PPMC members that do not opt-in explicitly at this point. They will have every opportunity to rejoin. On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 12:48 PM larry mccay w

Request to have me added as an IPMC Member

Hi - It has come to my attention that I don't seem to be an IPMC member (anymore?) and I would like to officially Mentor the reboot of Livy. thanks! --larry

Re: Proposal to Revive Apache Livy Community

I will ask in a separate thread, @Justin Mclean - thanks. Adding JB adds another company and we are certainly open to anyone else that would like to join as a mentor. At the end of the day, the mentors are for instilling the Apache Way knowledge and steering toward graduation. I feel that this

Re: Proposal to Revive Apache Livy Community

Approach to Revival: - Add new Mentors - Larry McCay, lmc...@apache.org , Cloudera - Sunil Govindan, sun...@apache.org, Cloudera - Imran Rashid - iras...@apache.org, Cloudera - Jean-Baptiste Onofré, jbono...@apache.org, Talend - Add new

Re: Proposal to Revive Apache Livy Community

Awesome - thanks, Justin! On Sat, Oct 15, 2022, 11:51 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > The project is free to choose RTC or RTC. I just wanted to check if it was > considered. I’ve seen in some cases, CTR tends to put a lot of work onto > existing committers and cause frustration when

Re: Proposal to Revive Apache Livy Community

Hi Justin - Thanks for the feedback. I can buy all of that other than the dev practices suggestion. The project originally used RTC as per the original proposal and being a more mature podling, I don't think we need to move that fast. With new committers, it will also be good to ensure others are

Re: Proposal to Revive Apache Livy Community

+d...@livy.incubator.apache.org On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 2:38 PM larry mccay wrote: > Abstract > > Livy is a web service that exposes a REST interface for managing long > running Apache Spark contexts in your cluster. With Livy, new applications > can be built on top

Proposal to Revive Apache Livy Community

improvements and fixes from organization’s internally maintained forks back to a revived community. General Approach to Revival: - Add new Mentors - Larry McCay, lmc...@apache.org , Cloudera - Sunil Govindan, sun...@apache.org, Cloudera - Imran Rashid

Re: [DISCUSS] Retire Livy podling

I have a simplified proposal nearly ready to send. Since there weren't any requirements for it provided here it is just declaring the intent and new members from this thread and my employer. If there is anything else you'd like to see in it just let me know. On Fri, Oct 14, 2022, 9:46 AM

Re: [DISCUSS] Retire Livy podling

Oct 10, 2022 at 7:19 AM Brahma Reddy Battula > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Larry, > > > > > > Nice to hear from you that you are planning propose new features and > make > > > active. > > > > > > We do use Livy in our pr

Re: [DISCUSS] Retire Livy podling

Sure. Thanks, Craig. --larry On Sun, Oct 9, 2022, 5:38 PM Craig Russell wrote: > Hi Larry, > > > On Oct 8, 2022, at 10:30, larry mccay wrote: > > > > Good to hear, Jean-Baptiste! > > We will send the proposal both here and to the Livy private list, I > guess.

Re: [DISCUSS] Retire Livy podling

ute on Livy. > > Regards > JB > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 6:08 PM larry mccay wrote: > > > > I was hoping that we could bring a set of contributors as: > > > > * mentors - 1 or 2 plus whoever wants to remain > > * PPMC/Committers - 2 or 3 plus whoever

Re: [DISCUSS] Retire Livy podling

eat, and I > > still agree to support. But it has to be concrete. > > > > Let's see what the other IPMC members are thinking, but IMHO, I doubt > > we will have Livy back to life in the short term. > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > On Thu, Oct 6, 202

Re: [DISCUSS] Retire Livy podling

Folks, As I mentioned in a previous thread [1], I would like to help avoid sending a well regarded, actively consumed and mature product to the attic. There have been discussions internally at my employer and we have also struggled getting our contributions committed. The original group of

Re: Is Livy podling still active?

-yoDW/?utm_source=linkedin_share_medium=member_desktop_web On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 9:55 AM larry mccay wrote: > I would be willing to join livy as a committer and mentor in a reboot if > there is interest. > > > On Mon, Jul 4, 2022, 3:05 AM Calvin Kirs wrote: > >> We h

Re: Is Livy podling still active?

I would be willing to join livy as a committer and mentor in a reboot if there is interest. On Mon, Jul 4, 2022, 3:05 AM Calvin Kirs wrote: > We had discussions last year, graduate or retire[1], but the project > still keep has remained downturn. > > Therefore, I agree to retire. > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 1.0.0-incubating release

752b4c407e5e89c0ba5a28cbe85e4784b728992731e845364e8c915a%40%3Cdev.tuweni.apache.org%3E > < > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r752b4c407e5e89c0ba5a28cbe85e4784b728992731e845364e8c915a@%3Cdev.tuweni.apache.org%3E > > > > The vote for Apache Tuweni 1.0.0 has concluded: > +1s: 5 > Antoine Toulme >

Re: [DISCUSS] Project proposal - Apache Rainbow

This seems like an interesting proposal. Couple points/questions: * The existing source is not available for viewing as it is still in private repos? * Is it a primarily java project? * It seems the intent of Rainbow is to not compete or overlap with the Hadoop ecosystem projects but rather to

Re: [PROPOSAL] sparklyr

This looks interesting to me. I would be willing to contribute, if you would like to add me to the initial list of committers. On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 10:50 AM Matt Sicker wrote: > A lot of core R libraries seem to be under GPL. If we build more R > projects at Apache, it seems like we may

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Tuweni 0.8.0

Congrats, Antoine and Apache Tuweni (Incubating) Community! Have you sent a separate email to the dev@ and user@ tuweni lists as well? If not, we should just include them on this one. On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 8:51 AM Jim Jagielski wrote: > w00t! > > > On Jul 9, 2019, at 11:59 PM, Antoine Toulme

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 0.8.0

Antoine - Thank you for your work getting the initial release done and patience here. As Dave said, we have our 3 +1's. thanks, --larry On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 6:15 PM Greg Stein wrote: > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 4:29 PM Craig Russell > wrote: > >... > > > No. Smiley face doesn't count. > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 0.8.0

It wasn't clear to me whether you were waiting for infra before issuing a -1 - sorry to have read too much into that. AFAIK - this is indeed still a first Apache release for Tuweni - not the first attempt but I don't believe that 0.7.0 was successfully voted to release. The change of the release

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 0.8.0

Going only by past experiences in the incubator, my understanding is that a graduation blocking issue is not something that necessarily blocks a podling release. It would be something that should be noted and fixed in follow up releases for sure. Perhaps the letter of the law change or the level

Re: [VOTE] Recommend 'Apache NetBeans graduation to Top Level Project' resolution to board

+1 On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 6:59 PM William Guo wrote: > +1 > > > William > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 9:11 AM Gang(Gary) Wang wrote: > > > +1 binding > > > > On Tue, Apr 9, 2019, 5:43 PM Daniel Gruno wrote: > > > > > On 09/04/2019 15.00, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

Apache Avac ??? On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 7:57 PM Antoine Toulme wrote: > There exists an outis open source project. > > Maybe we can riff on this name though. > > > On Mar 20, 2019, at 11:39, Kenneth Knowles wrote: > > > > Indeed, http://nemo.apache.org/ > > > > So I looked for similar ideas

Re: [VOTE] Accept Cava into the Apache Incubator

+1 On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 8:33 PM Byung-Gon Chun wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 5:20 AM Dave Fisher wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Looking forward to this podling! > > > > Regards, > > Dave > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > On Feb 20, 2019, at 11:50 AM, Antoine

Re: [PROPOSAL] New blockchain project: Cava

+1 I would also be interested in being involved as an initial committer for this. thanks, --larry Apache Knox, PMC Chair On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 5:47 PM Selvamohan Neethiraj wrote: > +1 > > Love to be part of this incubation project ….. > > Thanks, > Selva- > Apache Ranger, PMC Chair > > > On

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.14.0-incubating [rc1]

* built from source and ran all unit tests - over 1hr! * checked LICENSE and NOTICE files * Noticed things that others have already noted * Noted that there is no CHANGES file in the release artifact - there is a CHANGES.txt in

Re: [VOTE] Livy to enter Apache Incubator

This will be a great addition. +1 On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Sean Busbey wrote: > Hi folks! > > I'm calling a vote to accept "Livy" into the Apache Incubator. > > The full proposal is available below, and is also available in the wiki: > >

Re: The state of Sirona

at the moment. On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 7:21 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 3:04 PM larry mccay <lmc...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Well said. > > It is healthy to not have a podling graduate and subsequently struggle > as a > &

Re: The state of Sirona

Well said. It is healthy to not have a podling graduate and subsequently struggle as a TLP. This is actually a success of sorts. At least until a majority of podlings have trouble. :) On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > I think that we need to get over

Re: Request to Join IPMC

you can use whimsy to subscribe to > our private list. > > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/pmc.html > > John > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 9:57 PM larry mccay <lmc...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hello - > > > > I would be interested in joining the IPMC an

Request to Join IPMC

Hello - I would be interested in joining the IPMC and lending a hand within the incubator. I have recently been made an ASF member, am a committer on Apache Knox, Hadoop, Ranger and Metron. Please let me know if there is anything that you need from me. thanks, --larry

Re: [VOTE] Apache Metron podling Graduation

Ooops - I may not be able to claim (binding) for general incubator... My +1 (non-binding) still holds though. :) Metron has demonstrated a terrific commitment to the Apache Way. They get it and are definitely ready for graduation. On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 9:33 PM, larry mccay <lmc...@apache.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Metron podling Graduation

he projects within the scope of > > responsibility of the Apache Metron Project; and be it further > > > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > > Apache Metron Project: > > > > &

Re: [DISCUSS] Hammock to incubate at the ASF as Apache Hammock (incubating)

; > === Other Resources === > > * The project currently builds using Travis and right now there's no > reason to change that. > * The project leverages VersionEye for dependency up-to-date checks. > * The project would like to plan to leverage coveralls for test coverage > verif

Re: Worked LICENSE and NOTICE example

I can buy that, Justin. Starting to better communicate that knowledge is very much appreciated! On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Someday a tool to codify this into a wizard like thing would be awesome. > :) > > IMO (and I know others

Re: Worked LICENSE and NOTICE example

Such a pain point while finding your way and even having to add something later. Thanks for taking the time for this! Someday a tool to codify this into a wizard like thing would be awesome. :) On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:31 PM, Henry Saputra wrote: > Justin, > > Thank

Re: [VOTE] releasing Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7

Have to admit that I as confused by that as well. I voted previously and didn't see a CANCEL - so I intended to dig through the emails to see what I missed bit haven't gotten around to it. On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Casey Stella wrote: > Regarding what changed between

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

raph in the background section discussing how Apache > >avoids hostile forks of projects, because we don't want to fork > >communities. We've also added Larry McCay, P. Taylor Goetz, and Phillip > >Rhodes to the proposal. > > > >The vote will run until 12pm PST on Sun

Re: [DISCUSS] Metron incubator proposal

and the result of both votes was 12 +1's and no -1's. I've added them to > the proposal. > > .. Owen > > > > > > -Taylor > > > > > On Nov 30, 2015, at 1:15 PM, larry mccay <lmc...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > This is an interesting proposal that se

Re: [DISCUSS] Metron incubator proposal

This is an interesting proposal that seems would build a community where an open one doesn't really exist at the moment. A project like this needs a healthy community to survive and scale with the pace of changes in attacks. I for one would be interested in lending a hand as a contributor or

Re: Project Website Template

+1 - this would be a great resource for bootstrapping a new project! On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > +1 > > I had the same thought when I built Calcite’s site based on jekyll > (actually cloned from Orc’s site). Thanks for making this template — I’m > sure

Re: Concerning Sentry: A disagreement over the Apache Way and graduation

. The 7 Habits of Successful Podlings really is a great idea and would make an interesting article. :) Thanks, --larry On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On 11/05/2015 12:49 PM, larry

Re: Concerning Sentry: A disagreement over the Apache Way and graduation

+1 - I am concerned by the trend that I see developing here. A set of interview questions for evaluation is one thing but criteria checkboxes that will encourage behaviors by rote will not actually develop more healthy communities just communities that can get the boxes checked. While certain

Re: Concerning Sentry: A disagreement over the Apache Way and graduation

it provides > useful guidance. > > If you think the tool as expressed enforces "rote learning" how would you > suggest improving it to account for differences in communities? Are there > particular points within the tool that you find less useful, or things that > are missing

Re: [VOTE] Accept Eagle into Apache Incubation

+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 7:11 AM, Manoharan, Arun wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > Thanks for all the feedback on the Eagle Proposal. > > I would like to call for a [VOTE] on Eagle joining the ASF as an > incubation project. > > The vote is open for 72 hours: >

Re: [DISCUSS] Eagle incubator proposal

Arun - This is a very interesting proposal and I can imagine at least a couple ways that it and Apache Knox could work together. I would like to be a contributor to Eagle as well - if you are interested. I am a committer and PMC member on Knox and Ranger and have contributed to a number of

Re: [VOTE] Argus as a new incubator project

+1 (non-binding) On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Owen O'Malley omal...@apache.org wrote: Following the discussion earlier, I'm calling a vote to accept Argus as a new Incubator project. The proposal draft is available at: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ArgusProposal, and is also

Re: [VOTE] Accept Slider into the incubator

+1 (non-binding) On Apr 17, 2014 9:02 AM, Steve Loughran ste...@hortonworks.com wrote: I'd like to call a vote on accepting Slider into the incubator https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SliderProposal [ ] +1 Accept Slider into the Incubator [ ] +0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Slider [ ]

Re: Hoya Proposal

I agree with Marvin. Either works fine. The original meaning of Hoya doesn't have to continue to be acknowledged. On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.comwrote: On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 6:33 AM, Steve Loughran ste...@hortonworks.com wrote: On that note, I

Re: Hoya Proposal

. On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:07 AM, larry mccay larry.mc...@gmail.com wrote: I agree with Marvin. Either works fine. The original meaning of Hoya doesn't have to continue to be acknowledged. On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: On Mon

Re: Hoya Proposal

Hi Alejandro - I believe that Steve has already acknowledged that a package rename is required and that the project is likely not appropriate for Hadoop proper. thanks, --larry On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur t...@cloudera.comwrote: I may have not been clear enough, I

Wiki write permissions for LarryMcCay

Could I please have wiki write access for LarryMcCay to contribute to the Hoya incubator proposal? Thanks!

Re: Wiki write permissions for LarryMcCay

Thanks, sebb! On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 5:31 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: Done On 8 January 2014 18:42, larry mccay larry.mc...@gmail.com wrote: Could I please have wiki write access for LarryMcCay to contribute to the Hoya incubator proposal? Thanks

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Billie Rinaldi joins the IPMC

Congrats, Billie! On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.comwrote: Apache Member Billie Rinaldi, the PMC Chair for Accumulo and a member of the Ambari PMC, has elected to join the Incubator PMC. May you have as much success as an IPMC member as you had as a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Knox-0.3.1-incubating RC3

at 4:26 PM, Devaraj Das d...@hortonworks.com wrote: +1 on the RC. Downloaded, built and ran unit tests. On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 8:00 PM, larry mccay lmc...@apache.org wrote: Hello All - Just to follow up on this thread, we will have these NOTICES file issues corrected

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Knox-0.3.1-incubating RC3

if this is an inappropriate assumption. On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 2:30 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 20 November 2013 16:09, larry mccay larry.mc...@gmail.com wrote: Hello All, This is a call for a vote on Apache Knox Gateway 0.3.1 incubating. A vote was held on developer mailing list

[CANCELLED] [VOTE] Release Apache Knox-0.3.1-incubating RC3

feedback! Kevin. On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 3:24 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 2 December 2013 20:17, Larry McCay lmc...@hortonworks.com wrote: Thank you again, Sebb. I am noting your new findings here and will fix them asap for the next release. I assume that your lack

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Knox-0.3.1-incubating RC3

Hello All - Just to follow up on this thread, we will have these NOTICES file issues corrected in the next release and assume that this VOTE will continue in the absence of a -1 vote. Thank you again, for the insight here. --larry On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 10:40 AM, larry mccay larry.mc

Re: [DISCUSS] Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Knox-0.3.1-incubating RC3

clearly in the thread is very helpful. Regards, Dave On Nov 20, 2013, at 8:09 AM, larry mccay wrote: Hello All, This is a call for a vote on Apache Knox Gateway 0.3.1 incubating. A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 3 +1's, and 0 -1's or +0's and now requires

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Knox-0.3.1-incubating RC3

...@gmail.com wrote: On 20 November 2013 16:09, larry mccay larry.mc...@gmail.com wrote: Hello All, This is a call for a vote on Apache Knox Gateway 0.3.1 incubating. A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 3 +1's, and 0 -1's or +0's and now requires a vote on general

[VOTE] Release Apache Knox-0.3.1-incubating RC3

at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/knox/knox-incubating-0.3.1/CHANGES The release has been signed with key (587C089B): http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindexsearch=0x82F9C371587C089B Vote will be open for 72 hours. thanks, --larry Larry McCay

Re: [VOTE] Accept Twill for Incubation

+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote: +1 (non-binding) On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Andreas Neumann a...@apache.org wrote: The discussion about the Weave proposal has calmed. As the outcome of the discussion, we have chosen a new

Re: please follow through to publish doc changes

Jake, thank you for taking care of that! I didn't see anything on the Knox mailing list - should I have? Can you tell me exactly what was fixed and where? We will be sure to investigate what went wrong and document the proper procedure going forward. Is there anything that is outstanding that

Re: [VOTE] Usergrid BaaS Stack for Apache Incubator (revised proposal)

+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Lieven Govaerts lieven.govae...@gmail.comwrote: On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Dave snoopd...@gmail.com wrote: I would like to call for a new vote on Usergrid, a multi-tenant Backend-as-a-Service stack for web mobile applications based on

Re: The podling initial committers issue

I was under the impression that what you describe was the policy - if it is not then is should certainly be clarified. In the event that podlings continue to or are to be given such a choice, I believe that there needs to be a clear understanding between the incoming community and those

Re: The podling initial committers issue

that it is anyone's fault or anyone is right or wrong. We just need the champion/mentor survey questions established. On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: On Sep 25, 2013, at 1:33 PM, larry mccay larry.mc...@gmail.com wrote: That shared understanding seems

  1   2   >