Re: Request to review updated License (Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.3 (incubating))

Thank you everyone for the really helpful feedback. I will work with Ranger Dev community to address below concerns raised in this thread. 1] Review and verify all licenses listed in LICENSE are for bundled dependencies only 2] The code in question (

Re: Request to review updated License (Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.3 (incubating))

Hi, > I think these lines for "The Apache License 2.0" for the non-ASF are > misleading (everything else is also Apache License) and is not > required by the Apache license. While it’s not in line with current policy, it's not a licensing error to list them. Several projects do list them. It

Re: Request to review updated License (Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.3 (incubating))

I think these lines for "The Apache License 2.0" for the non-ASF are misleading (everything else is also Apache License) and is not required by the Apache license. > The Apache License 2.0 > --- > This product includes Bootstrap

Re: Request to review updated License (Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.3 (incubating))

Hi, > LICENSE is missing reset.css. (7) Note this version bundled may not be public > domain unlike this one (8) so you may need to sort that out. This is still an issue as far as I can tell. The code in question doesn't have a license. I’d contact the author to conform or replace with a

Re: Request to review updated License (Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.3 (incubating))

Hi, > Generally speaking, we only need to include the licenses for the > dependencies, not a notice that the dependency is contained. My understanding is that on things that are bundled need to be mentioned. [1] (and all the things mentioned in that license are bundled). There no need to

Re: Request to review updated License (Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.3 (incubating))

Velmurugan, I just want to make sure you understand... the comments are around compatible licenses, not specifically the jquery license. This was one that I grabbed as the first instance I saw. To point out, if for some reason these files were not in the source release (e.g. they're used on

Re: Request to review updated License (Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.3 (incubating))

Hi, > I would like to get your feedback on updated LICENSE.txt for Ranger. > https://github.com/apache/incubator-ranger/blob/master/LICENSE.txt Has the full text of each license been placed somewhere? Most permissive license (e.g. MIT, BSD) require you to do that, often the legal requirement

Re: Request to review updated License (Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.3 (incubating))

Thank you. I will fix the line format (i.e. to include only jQuery license and link). Any other concerns? On Jun 20, 2016, at 4:01 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 3:31 PM Alex Harui wrote: > >> IMO,

Re: Request to review updated License (Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.3 (incubating))

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 3:31 PM Alex Harui wrote: > IMO, http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps > says the blurb about JQuery goes in LICENSE, not NOTICE. > Yes, sorry, I should have been clearer about that. I was referring to the line format, not the

Re: Request to review updated License (Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.3 (incubating))

IMO, http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps says the blurb about JQuery goes in LICENSE, not NOTICE. On 6/20/16, 12:14 PM, "John D. Ament" wrote: >Lines like this are contents for the notice file, not license file: > > >This product includes

Re: Request to review updated License (Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.3 (incubating))

Lines like this are contents for the notice file, not license file: This product includes jQuery (http://jquery.org - MIT license), Copyright © 2014, John Resig. license file should include the various licenses covering these works. On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 3:07 PM Velmurugan Periasamy

Request to review updated License (Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.3 (incubating))

Hi Justin: I would like to get your feedback on updated LICENSE.txt for Ranger. https://github.com/apache/incubator-ranger/blob/master/LICENSE.txt Please see below answers to your questions. Ranger dev community is getting prepared for the next major release, so getting your feedback and

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.3 (incubating) - rc3

Incubator PMC, The vote has passed with 3 “+1” votes from IPMC members (who provided their votes in Dev VOTE thread) and no “0” or “-1” votes. +1 (binding): - Alan Gates - Jakob Homan - Colm O hEigeartaigh +0: None -1: None I will proceed with official release. Thank you so much for your

[VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.3 (incubating) - rc3

Incubator PMC: Apache Ranger community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache Ranger 0.5.3 (incubating). [VOTE RESULT] thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/Ztlreja8-xl1xr8 Apache ranger-0.5.3-rc3 release candidate (addressing few issues raised in previous IPMC

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.3 (incubating)

Thank you so much Justin. I’ll do the below. 1] Initiate another RC for 0.5.3. 2] Track these issues in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-964 and target to address in 0.6.0 Regarding your question on [5] and [6] below, I believe these files are covered under jquery globalize

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.3 (incubating)

Hi, Still needs some work IMO but if a JIRA was raised to fix these issues in a later release I’d vote +1 on a new RC without these fixes. Just as long as it’s all sorted before graduation. Minor issues: - LICENSE is missing MIT licensed Search Icon CSS copyright Nicolas Gallagher bundled in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.3 (incubating)

Thank you Justin. Cleaned up the license file as this library is not being used anymore. Please let us know if further changes are required. https://github.com/apache/incubator-ranger/blob/master/LICENSE.txt On May 18, 2016, at 3:10 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.3 (incubating)

Hi, > LICENSE.txt - > https://github.com/apache/incubator-ranger/blob/master/LICENSE.txt > NOTICE.txt - https://github.com/apache/incubator-ranger/blob/master/NOTICE.txt Not looked in detail, but I will tomorrow when I get some time. I did notice there’s a MPL licensed software mentioned in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.3 (incubating)

Thanks Justin. Pushed few changes addressing your suggestions. Could you please verify if the current LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt are acceptable? LICENSE.txt - https://github.com/apache/incubator-ranger/blob/master/LICENSE.txt NOTICE.txt -

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.3 (incubating)

Hi, > Just so that we get it right the next time, can you verify that the current > NOTICE is acceptable or does it require further changes? Doesn’t look correct to me as you are including items that should be in LICENSE not NOTICE. In general permissive licensed items don’t need to be

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.3 (incubating)

Hi Alan/Justin, Just so that we get it right the next time, can you verify that the current NOTICE is acceptable or does it require further changes?

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.3 (incubating)

-1 for now. Justin has brought up some issues with the LICENSE and NOTICE files that have note been addressed. Specifically: - LICENSE is still missing a few things (same issues as previous release) - NOTICE year is wrong and contains far too much text. There is not need to mention any

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.3 (incubating)

Hi, As far as I can see the license and notice issues brought up in the previous 2 incubator releases have not been addressed. Is there any reason for this? Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.3 (incubating)

Incubator PMC: The Apache Ranger community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache Ranger 0.5.3 (incubating) after addressing comments raised in IPMC review for ranger-0.5.3-rc1 vote. The ranger-0.5.3-rc2 release candidate is now available with the following artifacts up for a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.3 (incubating)

quot;d...@ranger.incubator.apache.org<mailto:d...@ranger.incubator.apache.org>" <d...@ranger.incubator.apache.org<mailto:d...@ranger.incubator.apache.org>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.3 (incubating) A couple of notes on the release. If they're simple enough

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.3 (incubating)

Hi, -1 binding as there were several issue raised with the last release and they have not been fixed. This include missing licenses from LICENSE / NOTICE issues and one file which the license is unclear. [1] I )checked: - signatures all good - name contains incubating - DISCLAIMER exists -

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.3 (incubating)

A couple of notes on the release. If they're simple enough to fix, I would like to see them fixes for this release. If not next release. - docs/NOTICE - this seems to be referring to Apache Maven Site Plugin, not Ranger - NOTICE.txt - wrong copyright years (pre-incubation?) John On Fri, Apr

[VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.3 (incubating)

Incubator PMC: The Apache Ranger community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache Ranger 0.5.3 (incubating). The ranger-0.5.3-rc1 release candidate is now available with the following artifacts up for a project vote : Git tag for the release: