Niclas Hedhman wrote:
[...]
b) I can't say that I understand the technical merits of the proposal, and
just see the headline analyzing large data sets. And I would like to know
the relationship with UIMA's statement ... analyze large volumes of
unstructured information... and hear whether
Olga Natkovich wrote:
Hi,
Yahoo! research and development teams have developed a proposal below. The
proposal is also available on wiki at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PigProposal.
We would like to ask that the ASF consider forming a podling according to
the proposal.
High-level
I am a +1 on the proposal, but I am still unclear, at
this point, how Y! is going to align the open source aspects
of Pig with their hiring push for Pig developers as per:
http://research.yahoo.com/project/pig
I guess this is more a general concern about the changing dynamics.
First, of
On Sep 24, 2007, at 4:44 AM, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Olga Natkovich wrote:
Hi,
Yahoo! research and development teams have developed a proposal
below. The
proposal is also available on wiki at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PigProposal.
We would like to ask that the ASF consider forming a
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
a) The name Pig is somewhat provocative (not kosher/halal) and I would like
to hear the rationale behind the name, and whether there are any willingness
to look for another name.
It is not meant to be provocative. It is named after the animal and is
not an acronym. It
Speaking just for myself, I find the name unusual but not offensive
or even provocative. The fact that you wouldn't eat an animal doesn't
mean you deny its existence...
Of course, I thought the language was officially called igpay atinlay.
Craig
On Sep 24, 2007, at 10:15 AM, Doug Cutting
On 9/24/07, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speaking just for myself, I find the name unusual but not offensive
or even provocative. The fact that you wouldn't eat an animal doesn't
mean you deny its existence...
And they make good pets in many cultures and are generally
acknowledged
On Sep 24, 2007, at 8:22 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Speaking just for myself, I find the name unusual but not offensive
or even provocative. The fact that you wouldn't eat an animal
doesn't mean you deny its existence...
+1
I find it a fun name, and the one unlikely to infringe on the
Jim Jagielski wrote:
In other words, if the corporate support
of the project or podling went away, would they stop
developing and working on the codebase because they,
after all, had no allegiance in the code at all? Were
they, in effect, coders-for-hire?
Yes, this is a known risk, perhaps the
Doug Cutting wrote:
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
a) The name Pig is somewhat provocative (not kosher/halal) and I
would like to hear the rationale behind the name, and whether there
are any willingness to look for another name.
It is not meant to be provocative. It is named after the animal
Actually we would really like to modify Ruby and Python to support Pig Latin
as part of the language: Ubyray and Ythonpay. We have avoided creating our
own crippled scripting language, there are just too many in the world, and
instead hope to take an existing language and and embedded Pig Latin
Hey,
On 9/24/07, Doug Cutting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
a) The name Pig is somewhat provocative (not kosher/halal) and I would
like
to hear the rationale behind the name, and whether there are any willingness
to look for another name.
It is not meant to be
We could add rules indefinitely to make just about anyone not usable...
I don't have any issues
with Pig.
Carl.
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hey,
On 9/24/07, Doug Cutting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
a) The name Pig is somewhat provocative (not kosher/halal) and I
Doug Cutting wrote:
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
a) The name Pig is somewhat provocative (not kosher/halal) and I
would like to hear the rationale behind the name, and whether there
are any willingness to look for another name.
It is not meant to be provocative. It is named after the animal and
I don't find the name provocative either, but the connotations are a
bit weird :-P
On Sep 24, 2007, at 10:39 AM, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Doug Cutting wrote:
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
a) The name Pig is somewhat provocative (not kosher/halal) and I
would like to hear the
On 9/24/07, Doug Cutting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
In other words, if the corporate support
of the project or podling went away, would they stop
developing and working on the codebase because they,
after all, had no allegiance in the code at all? Were
they, in
Olga Natkovich wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PigProposal.
We would like to ask that the ASF consider forming a podling according to
the proposal.
Thanks for all the comments. I've seen no issues raised that should
block Pig from entering incubation. Unless something arises before
On Wednesday 19 September 2007 03:52, Olga Natkovich wrote:
We would like to ask that the ASF consider forming a podling according to
the proposal.
+1, but I also got a couple of observations.
a) The name Pig is somewhat provocative (not kosher/halal) and I would like
to hear the rationale
+1 -- I'd offer to help as much as I can, but I know how little that
is right now :-(
Definitely support (and will probably use at least ;-)
-Brian
On Sep 18, 2007, at 12:52 PM, Olga Natkovich wrote:
Hi,
Yahoo! research and development teams have developed a proposal
below. The
On 9/18/07, Olga Natkovich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...We would like to ask that the ASF consider forming a podling according to
the proposal
+1 to the proposal, and I'd be happy to help as a mentor.
-Bertrand
-
To
+1 from me, too. It looks very promising. :-)
On 9/21/07, Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/18/07, Olga Natkovich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...We would like to ask that the ASF consider forming a podling
according to
the proposal
+1 to the proposal, and I'd be happy
+1
-Jim
On Sep 18, 2007, at 3:52 PM, Olga Natkovich wrote:
Hi,
Yahoo! research and development teams have developed a proposal
below. The
proposal is also available on wiki at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PigProposal
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PigProposal.
We would like to ask
On Sep 18, 2007, at 9:52 PM, Olga Natkovich wrote:
Yahoo! research and development teams have developed a proposal
below. The
proposal is also available on wiki at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PigProposal
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PigProposal.
We would like to ask that the ASF
On 9/20/07, Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 18, 2007, at 9:52 PM, Olga Natkovich wrote:
Yahoo! research and development teams have developed a proposal
below. The
proposal is also available on wiki at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PigProposal
On 20.09.2007, at 19:06, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On 9/20/07, Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 18, 2007, at 9:52 PM, Olga Natkovich wrote:
Yahoo! research and development teams have developed a proposal
below. The
proposal is also available on wiki at
Torsten Curdt wrote:
+1
Actually I would also be interested in stepping up as a mentor.
Thanks, that'd be great!
Please add yourself to the proposal in the wiki.
Doug
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Big +1! :)
Otis
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Simpy -- http://www.simpy.com/ - Tag - Search - Share
- Original Message
From: Olga Natkovich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 3:52:23 PM
Subject:
Done!
On 20.09.2007, at 19:46, Doug Cutting wrote:
Torsten Curdt wrote:
+1
Actually I would also be interested in stepping up as a mentor.
Thanks, that'd be great!
Please add yourself to the proposal in the wiki.
Doug
-
Hey,
On 9/18/07, Olga Natkovich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yahoo! research and development teams have developed a proposal below. The
proposal is also available on wiki at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PigProposal
Looks very cool to me. +1 to accepting Pig as an Incubator project.
I'll
Garrett Rooney wrote:
Is there any particular reason you want this podling to be sponsored
by the Incubator PMC (which is generally done for projects that intend
to turn into their own top level project) rather than having it
sponsored by the Lucene PMC (where Hadoop currently resides)? It
Hey,
On 9/18/07, Doug Cutting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
overlap a bit, but, to the primary folks involved, it feels like a
separate community and they'd prefer to aim for a TLP.
It should be clear to everyone involved, though, that part of the goal
of incubation is to diversify the project's
that plans to graduate and join the WS
PMC.
[1] http://incubator.apache.org/woden/
Lawrence
Garrett Rooney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
09/18/2007 04:02 PM
Please respond to
general@incubator.apache.org
To
general@incubator.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: Incubator Proposal: Pig
On 9/18/07, Lawrence Mandel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any particular reason you want this podling to be sponsored
by the Incubator PMC (which is generally done for projects that intend
to turn into their own top level project)
Is this true? I thought all new projects had to go through
On 9/18/07, Olga Natkovich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Yahoo! research and development teams have developed a proposal below. The
proposal is also available on wiki at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PigProposal
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PigProposal.
We would like to ask that the
+1 as well.
I would be happy to help with code contributions and user testing.
Yoav Shapira-2 wrote:
Hey,
On 9/18/07, Olga Natkovich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yahoo! research and development teams have developed a proposal below.
The
proposal is also available on wiki at
On 9/18/07, Doug Cutting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Garrett Rooney wrote:
Is there any particular reason you want this podling to be sponsored
by the Incubator PMC (which is generally done for projects that intend
to turn into their own top level project) rather than having it
sponsored by
Garrett Rooney wrote:
(if anything it seems like a new TLP
associated with hadoop and generic distributed computing tools like
pig that are built on top of hadoop seems like it would make more
sense than just a pig TLP),
Yes, I agree. But that's not happened yet, and the Pig folks are ready
Yoav Shapira wrote:
It should be clear to everyone involved, though, that part of the goal
of incubation is to diversify the project's community so that it's not
disjoint from everyone else. I hope to have a bunch of non-Yahoo
people contributing to the project.
Indeed. That's the primary
On Sep 18, 2007, at 2:45 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
Garrett Rooney wrote:
(if anything it seems like a new TLP
associated with hadoop and generic distributed computing tools like
pig that are built on top of hadoop seems like it would make more
sense than just a pig TLP),
Yes, I agree. But
39 matches
Mail list logo
