Hi All,
I'm pleased to finally propose the SuperXMailer for Jakarta via the
incubator. I'd like for the Jakarta PMC/committers to vote a tacit
approval of the project before we work on acceptance into the
incubator. I'm sure that despite the inevitable controversy, folks will
see a true
On 1/04/2003 22:03 Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
I'm pleased to finally propose the SuperXMailer for Jakarta via the
incubator.
:-D
Nice one!
/Steven
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java XML Competence Support Center
Read my weblog at
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Hi All,
I'm pleased to finally propose the SuperXMailer for Jakarta via the
incubator. I'd like for the Jakarta PMC/committers to vote a tacit
approval of the project before we work on acceptance into the
incubator. I'm sure that despite the inevitable controversy,
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Tuesday, April 1, 2003, at 03:21 PM, Tom Copeland wrote:
+1 if I could just think of a BUSINESS PROPOSAL that could put this to
use
Let me help you get started:
Hello honored sir, my name is Mkwila Mnembi, and I am the
I'm +1 to Andrew's proposal. I think it is terrible that there is not an
enterprise class open source solution in this field. All those poor
businessmen, using hacked together solutions or proprietary technologies.
To make success inevitable, let's start by drawing a bunch of UML
diagrams!
Nice one, made my day :-)
d.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew C. Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 April 2003 21:03
To: Jakarta General List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Proposal] SuperXMailer
Hi All,
I'm pleased to finally propose the SuperXMailer for Jakarta via the
Interested in being a committer? Just add your name!
Steven Noels wrote:
On 1/04/2003 22:03 Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
I'm pleased to finally propose the SuperXMailer for Jakarta via the
incubator.
:-D
Nice one!
/Steven
Can you get Mark Wutka to state that his LGPL explicitly permits linking
and that section 6 of the LGPL does not apply to end users, etc etc? Is
he the copyright holder?
If so than you should be good to go (from my understanding). (As the
copyright holder he can explicitly address the issues
To make success inevitable, let's start by drawing a bunch of UML
diagrams!
And we need to work on implementing a CMM process for opensource. The
SDLC seems like an excellent way to do that. If we can get developers
working along the SDLC, I think we could get a more repeatable
eb site and additional examples.
[2] identify the initial source from which the project is to
be populated
The project currently resides on the SourceForge
(http://tapestry.sf.net).
My wife says I sometimes code in my sleep. Now I know what I've been up-to
:-)
Gotta watch that
Is this reply FAQ/Wiki'd somewhere?
Seems to me to be a good set of questions to ask of an LGPL project to
cause happiness all around. Assuming it's okay with the powers that be,
boards/committees/usuals.
Hen
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Can you get Mark Wutka to state that
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Can you get Mark Wutka to state that his LGPL explicitly permits linking
and that section 6 of the LGPL does not apply to end users, etc etc? Is
he the copyright holder?
If so than you should be good to go (from my understanding). (As the
copyright holder he can
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Sam Ruby wrote:
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Can you get Mark Wutka to state that his LGPL explicitly permits linking
and that section 6 of the LGPL does not apply to end users, etc etc? Is
he the copyright holder?
If so than you should be good to go (from my
You did actually create a sourceforge project for this joke ?
Costin
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Hi All,
I'm pleased to finally propose the SuperXMailer for Jakarta via the
incubator. I'd like for the Jakarta PMC/committers to vote a tacit
approval of the project before we work on
I just got an answer from Mark.
So I guess it should be ok without further ado. Pleas let me know if it
ain't.
Cheers,
Aslak
-Original Message-
From: Mark Wutka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2. april 2003 00:24
To: Aslak Hellesoy
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [EMAIL
Sam Ruby wrote:
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Can you get Mark Wutka to state that his LGPL explicitly permits
linking and that section 6 of the LGPL does not apply to end users,
etc etc? Is he the copyright holder?
If so than you should be good to go (from my understanding). (As the
copyright
:-D I created the sourceforge project months and months ago! With full
disclosure as to its purpose.
-Andy
Costin Manolache wrote:
You did actually create a sourceforge project for this joke ?
Costin
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Hi All,
I'm pleased to finally propose the SuperXMailer for
You've spent months planning an April Fool's joke?
On Tuesday, April 1, 2003, at 08:12 PM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
:-D I created the sourceforge project months and months ago! With
full disclosure as to its purpose.
-Andy
Costin Manolache wrote:
You did actually create a sourceforge
Its april fools day?
I spent 5 minutes, months ago...
-Andy
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
You've spent months planning an April Fool's joke?
On Tuesday, April 1, 2003, at 08:12 PM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
:-D I created the sourceforge project months and months ago! With
full disclosure as to
All,
In order to minimise the possibility of brand overloading or brand
segmentation I propose that we introduce the standard community building
techniques.
So to this end I propose the immediate creation of
* a wiki to capture all this valuable discussion
* a set of blogs so that members of
on 2003/4/1 6:08 PM, Ben Walding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is called value-adding in
the commercial world. Some of you communist coding hippies may not have
heard of this.
Of course there is no value in open source since it is all free. =)
-jon
--
BU**
SH**
21 matches
Mail list logo
