Henri Yandell wrote:
An FYI. Please kick me if I'm going too far with these ideas; I get the
feeling I have a general +0, but hard to tell sometimes.
See interspersed. I am not quite to the + point yet, but probably
either just missing some concepts / principles or interested in
Hi there,
I have a problem!
I must send a post multipart/form-data message from an applet to a servlet,
I wrote this piece of code:
try{
// Create a socket to the host
String hostname=localhost;
int port=8080;
InetAddress addr=InetAddress.getByName(hostname);
Socket socket=new
Hola,
An FYI. Please kick me if I'm going too far with these ideas; I get the
feeling I have a general +0, but hard to tell sometimes.
Not going too far: these are good ideas IMHO.
My aim for Jakarta is to either promote subprojects to TLP or flatten them
into
Jakarta Commons, leading to a
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005, Phil Steitz wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
An FYI. Please kick me if I'm going too far with these ideas; I get the
feeling I have a general +0, but hard to tell sometimes.
See interspersed. I am not quite to the + point yet, but probably either
just missing some
Second FYI, the external to Jakarta part of the specs thread is going on
at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hen
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005, Henri Yandell wrote:
An FYI. Please kick me if I'm going too far with these ideas; I get the
feeling I have a general +0, but hard to tell sometimes.
Hen
--
Hello everyone,
I am currently discussing the Jakarta project charter and have a few
questions about the structure of the whole jakarta-subproject-package
system. I am a bit confused about the terminology used in the charter. :
quote
Apache-Java and Jakarta originally hosted product-based
Henri Yandell wrote:
snip/
It would be great if we could get a consensus on what an umbrella
is and
An umbrella is a joining of disjoint communities under a common TLP.
A non-umbrella is one in which the whole project is a part of the
same community.
Nice definition. Thanks.
snip/
Hi Phil,
On 12/28/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks again. So the real problem is disjointness. It seems then that
we have three logical alternatives:
I don't think there is a lot of difference any of these. Jakarta
commons as a TLP is basically (1) as well. There are
I would recommend that you use something like Commons HttpClient to
construct and make the request, instead of trying to do so manually, as you
are now. See:
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/httpclient/
You might also want to use Commons FileUpload to parse the request, instead
of the O'Reilly
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005, Phil Steitz wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
The biggest problem with Jakarta currently is that we've become
increasingly disjoint. In many ways we are less healthy than we were 4
years ago. We have less projects, but much less in the way of intersection
between
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005, Brett Porter wrote:
Thinking more about this, I don't know about pushing things into
commons. The important thing is consistent practices, consolidated
committers and community, but maybe not the naming. Jakarta BCEL
sounds fine to stay that way, as does Jakarta Commons
11 matches
Mail list logo
