On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 10:20 -0800, Martin Cooper wrote:
On 1/10/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Groups exist. These are categorically not subprojects, but a way to
allow for slicing of the website etc. Some groups may have the
On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 10:20 -0800, Martin Cooper wrote:
> On 1/10/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > As a second email in the Notice of intent series; here's what I think
> > being a Jakarta component will be like in the future.
> >
> > * Jakarta is a collection of components.
On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 09:55 -0100, jan meskens wrote:
> Hello Henri,
>
> I was looking to these page :
> http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/charter.html
>
> Maybe that's the wrong page for these info... .
not wrong probably just a little confusing
the jakarta commons charter encapsulates the opi
Others may disagree, but personally, I always liked the Maverick MVC
framework. It's very simple, has no excess baggage. I've found it a good
approach to MVC for those new to the concept. You might take a quick look.
http://mav.sourceforge.com
As an aside, also check out the Velocity projec
> At first I tried to use JSP without any framework or taglib. In
> contrast to templates JSP doesn't help much on seperating logic
> and html code
Please see the JSP 2.0 Specification for Tag Files. Tags are your friends,
and Tag Files make them easy to write.
> And I could not get used to the
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Jakarta Wiki" for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by MartinCooper:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta/JakartaBoardReport-March2006
The comment on the change is:
FileUpload 1.1 release didn't make it int
Henri Yandell wrote:
Just to update.
On Fri, 6 Jan 2006, Henri Yandell wrote:
Just to report on my push for subprojects to move to TLP. I've hassled
6 subprojects so far:
* Slide: +1 (for a long time) though not very active which is why it's
not
moved.
Prodded.
Maybe an
On 1/10/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> As a second email in the Notice of intent series; here's what I think
> being a Jakarta component will be like in the future.
>
> * Jakarta is a collection of components. Hopefully all sitting at the same
> level. ie) a big bag of things.
>
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, Martin van den Bemt wrote:
Almost completely +1.
One thing first : http://java.apache.org, redirects to archive.apache.org,
while I still know people that are think java stuff stuff on apache.org is
happening there, so maybe a redirect to a more friendly page could take
Almost completely +1.
One thing first : http://java.apache.org, redirects to archive.apache.org, while I still know people
that are think java stuff stuff on apache.org is happening there, so maybe a redirect to a more
friendly page could take place there ? (though this could be something for i
Hi Henri,
Mostly agree with all your responses.
I want to emphasize though that Jakarta has two entry points for users
* People coming finding a general "Java @ Apache" resource. (which the
reorg helps)
* People looking for a specific resource after reading about it, hearing
word-of-mouth,
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Will Glass-Husain wrote:
Thanks, Henri.
My feedback.
Thanks, very useful stuff.
* Generally positive with an aversion to anything involving significant work
for the sake of a "cleaner Jakarta". By this I mean that I like the idea of
a flatter hierarchy and a clearer
Thanks, Henri.
My feedback.
* Generally positive with an aversion to anything involving significant work
for the sake of a "cleaner Jakarta". By this I mean that I like the idea of
a flatter hierarchy and a clearer message to the public as to what Jakarta
is about. As I noted on the Velocit
Hello Ortwin,
* You mention "problems with JSP". What are they?
At first I tried to use JSP without any framework or taglib. In contrast
to templates JSP doesn't help much on seperating logic and html code,
because you still need comparatively much code to iterate over Lists, or
print out s
Dennis,
I don't want to discourage you. But I fail to see any of the following:
* You mention "problems with JSP". What are they?
* Which frameworks do you mean and what's the problem with them?
* What does you framework make better?
* Why do you invent a proprietary XML scripting facility? JSTL
Hello,
I had been programming dynamic Websites with PHP the last few years until
I discovered Java, and all its advantages. But I had many problems
migrating to JSP, and tried many frameworks until I gave up and created an
own framework, that is easy to use even for ex-PHP developer (Target
As a second email in the Notice of intent series; here's what I think
being a Jakarta component will be like in the future.
* Jakarta is a collection of components. Hopefully all sitting at the same
level. ie) a big bag of things.
* Groups exist. These are categorically not subprojects, but
Just to update.
On Fri, 6 Jan 2006, Henri Yandell wrote:
Just to report on my push for subprojects to move to TLP. I've hassled 6
subprojects so far:
* Slide: +1 (for a long time) though not very active which is why it's not
moved.
Prodded.
* Tapestry: They were +1 early last
18 matches
Mail list logo
