Re: ImportScrubberTask

2001-10-23 Thread Tom_Copeland
cc: Subject: Re: ImportScrubberTask

Re: ImportScrubberTask

2001-10-23 Thread Markus Dahm
On Monday 22 October 2001 22:21, you wrote: Hi, > When writing JNI code which references Java classes, one has to use > special markup on the fully qualified class names. > I.e. "Lorg/apache/turbine/Turbine;" would be the string literal > corresponding to the class org.apache.turbine.Turbine, and

Re: ImportScrubberTask

2001-10-23 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
On 10/22/01 1:23 PM, "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jon Stevens at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> import email.RequireApproval.vm; >> >> Wow. When did Velocity files become ok to import? :-) > > You didn't know? They're adding those to the VM spec, so that you can > directly writ

Re: ImportScrubberTask

2001-10-22 Thread Tom_Copeland
Rall cc: Sent by: Subject: Re: ImportScrubbe

Re: ImportScrubberTask

2001-10-22 Thread Tom_Copeland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: ImportScrubberTask

Re: ImportScrubberTask

2001-10-22 Thread Daniel Rall
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > That's too bad that importscrubber messed up the Scarab source code. > Importscrubber is still definitely a work in progress, and there are some > things that it is definitely going to miss. For example, since the > compiler inlines references to static finals, a

Re: ImportScrubberTask

2001-10-22 Thread Glenn Nielsen
Jon Stevens wrote: > on 10/22/01 10:23 AM, "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>You didn't know? They're adding those to the VM spec, so that you can >>directly write in Velocity without having the hassle to pass thru Java :) :) >> >> Pier (being ready to be flamed by JG! :) >> >

Re: ImportScrubberTask

2001-10-22 Thread Jon Stevens
on 10/22/01 10:56 AM, "Jason van Zyl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I only ran it on a small body of source, but Scarab is a good test bed. Scarab is something like 256 classes...most of it is Torque generated though... -jon -

Re: ImportScrubberTask

2001-10-22 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 10/22/01 1:04 PM, "Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on 10/22/01 6:22 AM, "Jason van Zyl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> It works fine, but there is a problem with the imports being placed in the >> wrong place when there is text right after the package declaration. I asked >> Tom Co

Re: ImportScrubberTask

2001-10-22 Thread Jon Stevens
on 10/22/01 10:23 AM, "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You didn't know? They're adding those to the VM spec, so that you can > directly write in Velocity without having the hassle to pass thru Java :) :) > > Pier (being ready to be flamed by JG! :) Na...we would have to rename Ve

Re: ImportScrubberTask

2001-10-22 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Jon Stevens at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > import email.RequireApproval.vm; > > Wow. When did Velocity files become ok to import? :-) You didn't know? They're adding those to the VM spec, so that you can directly write in Velocity without having the hassle to pass thru Java :) :) Pier (bein

Re: ImportScrubberTask

2001-10-22 Thread Jon Stevens
on 10/22/01 6:22 AM, "Jason van Zyl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It works fine, but there is a problem with the imports being placed in the > wrong place when there is text right after the package declaration. I asked > Tom Copeland to fix this for me and he said he would get to it today. It > d

Re: ImportScrubberTask

2001-10-22 Thread Tom_Copeland
: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: ImportScrubberTask

Re: ImportScrubberTask

2001-10-22 Thread Tom_Copeland
FumagalliTo: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sion.org>Subject: Re: ImportScr

Re: ImportScrubberTask

2001-10-22 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 10/21/01 11:52 PM, "Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on 10/21/01 8:40 PM, "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Jon Stevens at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.importscrubber.I

RE: ImportScrubberTask

2001-10-21 Thread Tim Vernum
> probably - but that project is not alone. Heaps of external > projects use this > namespace. About the only ones who put it in their own namespace (ie > org.apache.torque.tasks.*) are at Apache or the occasional other one. I think one of the causes is that people write optional tasks in the

Re: ImportScrubberTask

2001-10-21 Thread Peter Donald
On Mon, 22 Oct 2001 13:20, Jon Stevens wrote: > > > org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.importscrubber.ImportScrubberTask > > Given that this isn't an official Jakarta project, shouldn't the tool > choose another namespace? probably - but that p

Re: ImportScrubberTask

2001-10-21 Thread Jon Stevens
on 10/21/01 8:40 PM, "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jon Stevens at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> >> >> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.importscrubber.ImportScrubberTask >> >> Given that this isn't an official Jakarta projec

Re: ImportScrubberTask

2001-10-21 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Jon Stevens at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.importscrubber.ImportScrubberTask > > Given that this isn't an official Jakarta project, shouldn't the tool choose > another namespace? Indeed... Pier --