Hello,
I would like to propose the movement of the Helma XML-RCP package
(http://xmlrpc.helma.org/) to Jakarta. The Helma XML-RPC package
is the most popular OSS XML-RPC package and Hannes
Wallnoefer would like to donate the code to the Jakarta project.
There is an active community based
I strongly believe that any any such nomination should be to
xml.apache.org.
- Sam Ruby
Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 07/03/2001 10:19:36 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta
Hello,
I would like to propose the movement
I would like to propose the movement of the Helma XML-RCP package
(http://xmlrpc.helma.org/) to Jakarta. The Helma XML-RPC package
is the most popular OSS XML-RPC package and Hannes
Wallnoefer would like to donate the code to the Jakarta project.
There is an active community based around the
on 7/3/01 7:19 AM, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to propose the movement of the Helma XML-RCP package
(http://xmlrpc.helma.org/) to Jakarta. The Helma XML-RPC package
is the most popular OSS XML-RPC package and Hannes
Wallnoefer would like to donate the code to the
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hello,
I would like to propose the movement of the Helma XML-RCP package
(http://xmlrpc.helma.org/) to Jakarta. The Helma XML-RPC package
is the most popular OSS XML-RPC package and Hannes
Wallnoefer would like to donate the code to the Jakarta project.
There is
Jason makes a very good point.
I believe we could see XML-RPC become a integral
component to other jakarta projects.
Terry McBride
--- Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/3/01 11:27 AM, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I strongly believe that any any such nomination
should be
Hello,
We have a developer who would like to contribute a piece of code under the Apache
software license but at the same time would like to keep using the same piece of code
under a different (the original) license. I am sure this not the first time this
happens. How did the foundation deal
Jason van Zyl wrote:
I strongly believe that any any such nomination should be to
xml.apache.org.
Reasons?
The xml-axis project is a restructuring of xml-soap. This restructuring
was initiated with the expressed intent of providing a foundation for
supporting multiple protocols, including,
On 7/3/01 4:36 PM, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
I strongly believe that any any such nomination should be to
xml.apache.org.
Reasons?
The xml-axis project is a restructuring of xml-soap. This restructuring
was initiated with the expressed intent of
Sam Ruby at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I strongly believe that any any such nomination should be to
xml.apache.org.
I agree 100% with Sam...
Pier
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
Jason van Zyl wrote:
I think that was a knee jerk reaction to seeing XML in the project name.
Fair enough. You've had two people so far.
Not fair. I can't speak for others, but I am an active committer on
xml-soap and xml-apache (two different projects only in the sense that
Tomcat 3 and 4
On 7/3/01 8:10 PM, Pier P. Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sam Ruby at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I strongly believe that any any such nomination should be to
xml.apache.org.
I agree 100% with Sam...
Again, that's an unqualified response. I responsed to Sam when he
clarified his
Jason van Zyl wrote:
You have totally side stepped the fact that no at xml.apache.org is
interested in XML-RPC. What exactly is the interest level in
XML-RPC? I honestly don't know a whole lot about SOAP, but I have
been using XML-RPC for a long while now and it's simple and works
great.
On 7/3/01 8:56 PM, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
You have totally side stepped the fact that no at xml.apache.org is
interested in XML-RPC. What exactly is the interest level in
XML-RPC? I honestly don't know a whole lot about SOAP, but I have
been using XML-RPC
14 matches
Mail list logo
