To me that is the closed version of XFORMS.
I likve novell.com/xforms that runs on Tomcat etc., and does not lock in
a Windows client.
.V
Dominique Devienne wrote:
Did you guys see in the news that Office 11 will have standard compliant XML
schemas for Word and Excel files??? --DD
Hi,
just wanted to say thank you to Rob Oxspring for compiling the
Jakarta Newsletter. I can imagine how much work is needed to
keep this up and running.
Merry x-mas and a happy new year for you guys!
Regards,
Markus
--
http://home.t-online.de/home/howlingmad/
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Because its more stable and runs faster under Linux than Star/OpenOffice?
-Andy
Scott Sanders wrote:
But EVERYONE knows Word is only used on emails and simple love letters
(with viri) under 4 pages.
Why would you use anything else?
Scott
PS I do use Windows at work, and I even once had
On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 09:18, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Because its more stable and runs faster under Linux than Star/OpenOffice?
Sadly, MS Word under CrossOver Office is more stable on my Linux
workstation at work than OpenOffice. Hopefully this will change.
-Brian
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
I think this thread has lost its way :-)
Conor
you are right!
Because its more stable and runs faster under Linux than Star/OpenOffice?
Sadly, MS Word under CrossOver Office is more stable on my Linux
workstation at work than OpenOffice. Hopefully this will change.
-Brian
so ppl,
Sadly, MS Word under CrossOver Office is more stable on my Linux
workstation at work than OpenOffice. Hopefully this will change.
-Brian
so ppl, why don't you report bugs so they can make it stable?!!!
Before you lecture, go look at the OpenOffice sources. It is amazing that
the thing
Amen, Brother. Kill this thread!
At 01:50 AM 12/14/2002 +1100, you wrote:
Brian McCallister wrote:
On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 09:18, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Because its more stable and runs faster under Linux than Star/OpenOffice?
Sadly, MS Word under CrossOver Office is more stable on my Linux
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 06:42:36PM +0200, mohammad nabil wrote:
support Sun, Open Source, and all good manufacturar in our nice world :)
Do you just not grasp that Sun's rigid control of Java is the
antithesis of Open Source, and _especially_ the Apache philosophy?
Try forking the Java
Ok, I got a couple of complaints from freaks whose DNS didn't refresh all
right (not _my_ fault :-)... If someone on your favorite list is complaining
that they can't see Nagoya, or the bug database, tell them to fix their DNS
server (first) and to use the (new) IP address straight:
On 13/12/02 20:00 Jeff Schnitzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 06:42:36PM +0200, mohammad nabil wrote:
support Sun, Open Source, and all good manufacturar in our nice world :)
Do you just not grasp that Sun's rigid control of Java is the
antithesis of Open Source, and
Sun is exactly what Microsoft would be if it were short a few billion
dollars. To think otherwise is to
significantly deceive ones self.
-Andy
Jeff Schnitzer wrote:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 06:42:36PM +0200, mohammad nabil wrote:
support Sun, Open Source, and all good manufacturar in our
To suggest that Sun [t]here's nothing 'open' about Sun is not very
insightful. Compare them to Microsoft, for example. You need to speak in
ways that at least pass the laugh test. Sun deserves one hell of a lot of
credit.
At 02:44 AM 12/14/2002 +, you wrote:
On 13/12/02 20:00 Jeff
12 matches
Mail list logo
