--- Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> For example:
> - HttpComponents
> - WebComponents
> - LibraryComponents (narrowAPI-deep)
> - BaseComponents (broadAPI-shallow)
Explain that narrowAPI-deep, braodAPI-shallow
business.
---
Phil Steitz wrote:
Hopefully we can keep it at a point where the groups are really just
there to refine the flow of mail, not to separate it. HttpComponents
is an example of this (though not a good one as most of its components
came from HttpClient). WebComponents (formerly hoped to be known as
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
The result can be a couple of things (probably depending on the
response) :
- Leave it as is
- Move them to emuritus
Above two are the only acceptable choices for folks with valid accounts.
We can discuss means and mechanisms of moving to
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
The result can be a couple of things (probably depending on the response) :
- Leave it as is
- Move them to emuritus
Above two are the only acceptable choices for folks with valid accounts. We can
discuss means and mechanisms of moving to emeritus and back, but remov
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Danny Angus wrote:
I'm one of the "1) Inactive PMC members
Define inactive. Inactive as a committer? Inactive as a PMC member
providing oversight to Jakarta projects? I'm in the former category, as are
many, but I still actively monitor several project lists, even
Danny Angus wrote:
> I'm one of the "1) Inactive PMC members
Define inactive. Inactive as a committer? Inactive as a PMC member
providing oversight to Jakarta projects? I'm in the former category, as are
many, but I still actively monitor several project lists, even if I only
post when I have
On 1/12/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Danny Angus wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > I'm one of the "1) Inactive PMC members : 39"
> >
> > For historical reasons I made it onto this PMC just as the project I was
> > really involved with (James) got promoted to TL
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 1/12/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-=-=-=-=
Mostly I'm worried about:
PMC members who are not on pmc@ (there's a handful)
PMC members who are not on general@ (never looked. I will soon)
Inactive committers who are not on the P
On 1/12/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> -=-=-=-=
>
> Mostly I'm worried about:
>
> PMC members who are not on pmc@ (there's a handful)
> PMC members who are not on general@ (never looked. I will soon)
> Inactive committers who are not on the PMC (200+)
>
s/Inactive/Active/ ?
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Danny Angus wrote:
I'm one of the "1) Inactive PMC members : 39"
For historical reasons I made it onto this PMC just as the project I was
really involved with (James) got promoted to TLP.
I hung around to try to help make sure that Jakarta didn't die as a result
o
I'm one of the "1) Inactive PMC members : 39"
For historical reasons I made it onto this PMC just as the project I was
really involved with (James) got promoted to TLP.
I hung around to try to help make sure that Jakarta didn't die as a result
of all the reorganisation, and wasn't killed o
11 matches
Mail list logo