Re: Notice of intent.... #2

2006-01-12 Thread Tim OBrien
--- Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For example: > - HttpComponents > - WebComponents > - LibraryComponents (narrowAPI-deep) > - BaseComponents (broadAPI-shallow) Explain that narrowAPI-deep, braodAPI-shallow business. ---

Re: Notice of intent.... #2

2006-01-12 Thread Stephen Colebourne
Phil Steitz wrote: Hopefully we can keep it at a point where the groups are really just there to refine the flow of mail, not to separate it. HttpComponents is an example of this (though not a good one as most of its components came from HttpClient). WebComponents (formerly hoped to be known as

Re: Jakarta stats

2006-01-12 Thread Martin van den Bemt
Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Martin van den Bemt wrote: The result can be a couple of things (probably depending on the response) : - Leave it as is - Move them to emuritus Above two are the only acceptable choices for folks with valid accounts. We can discuss means and mechanisms of moving to

Re: Jakarta stats

2006-01-12 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Martin van den Bemt wrote: The result can be a couple of things (probably depending on the response) : - Leave it as is - Move them to emuritus Above two are the only acceptable choices for folks with valid accounts. We can discuss means and mechanisms of moving to emeritus and back, but remov

Re: Jakarta stats

2006-01-12 Thread Martin van den Bemt
Noel J. Bergman wrote: Danny Angus wrote: I'm one of the "1) Inactive PMC members Define inactive. Inactive as a committer? Inactive as a PMC member providing oversight to Jakarta projects? I'm in the former category, as are many, but I still actively monitor several project lists, even

RE: Jakarta stats

2006-01-12 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Danny Angus wrote: > I'm one of the "1) Inactive PMC members Define inactive. Inactive as a committer? Inactive as a PMC member providing oversight to Jakarta projects? I'm in the former category, as are many, but I still actively monitor several project lists, even if I only post when I have

Re: Jakarta stats

2006-01-12 Thread Martin Cooper
On 1/12/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Danny Angus wrote: > > > > > > > I'm one of the "1) Inactive PMC members : 39" > > > > For historical reasons I made it onto this PMC just as the project I was > > really involved with (James) got promoted to TL

Re: Jakarta stats

2006-01-12 Thread Henri Yandell
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Rahul Akolkar wrote: On 1/12/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -=-=-=-= Mostly I'm worried about: PMC members who are not on pmc@ (there's a handful) PMC members who are not on general@ (never looked. I will soon) Inactive committers who are not on the P

Re: Jakarta stats

2006-01-12 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 1/12/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > -=-=-=-= > > Mostly I'm worried about: > > PMC members who are not on pmc@ (there's a handful) > PMC members who are not on general@ (never looked. I will soon) > Inactive committers who are not on the PMC (200+) > s/Inactive/Active/ ?

Re: Jakarta stats

2006-01-12 Thread Henri Yandell
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Danny Angus wrote: I'm one of the "1) Inactive PMC members : 39" For historical reasons I made it onto this PMC just as the project I was really involved with (James) got promoted to TLP. I hung around to try to help make sure that Jakarta didn't die as a result o

Re: Jakarta stats

2006-01-12 Thread Danny Angus
I'm one of the "1) Inactive PMC members : 39" For historical reasons I made it onto this PMC just as the project I was really involved with (James) got promoted to TLP. I hung around to try to help make sure that Jakarta didn't die as a result of all the reorganisation, and wasn't killed o