My unsolicited opinion: projects focused on the manipulation and purveyance of
data as XML could/should belong in the xml.apache.org project while
implementations of Java technologies associate with Jakarta. There's
nothing Java specific about XML-RPC and SOAP (buh, that's the point). If I h
On 7/3/01 8:56 PM, "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jason van Zyl wrote:
>>
>> You have totally side stepped the fact that no at xml.apache.org is
>> interested in XML-RPC. What exactly is the interest level in
>> XML-RPC? I honestly don't know a whole lot about SOAP, but I have
>> been u
Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> You have totally side stepped the fact that no at xml.apache.org is
> interested in XML-RPC. What exactly is the interest level in
> XML-RPC? I honestly don't know a whole lot about SOAP, but I have
> been using XML-RPC for a long while now and it's simple and works
> grea
On 7/3/01 8:34 PM, "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jason van Zyl wrote:
>>
>> I think that was a knee jerk reaction to seeing XML in the project name.
>> Fair enough. You've had two people so far.
>
> Not fair. I can't speak for others, but I am an active committer on
> xml-soap and xm
On 7/3/01 8:10 PM, "Pier P. Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sam Ruby at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> I strongly believe that any any such nomination should be to
>> xml.apache.org.
>
> I agree 100% with Sam...
Again, that's an unqualified response. I responsed to Sam when he
clarified
Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> I think that was a knee jerk reaction to seeing XML in the project name.
> Fair enough. You've had two people so far.
Not fair. I can't speak for others, but I am an active committer on
xml-soap and xml-apache (two different projects only in the sense that
Tomcat 3 and 4
Sam Ruby at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I strongly believe that any any such nomination should be to
> xml.apache.org.
I agree 100% with Sam...
Pier
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-ma
On 7/3/01 4:36 PM, "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jason van Zyl wrote:
>>
>>> I strongly believe that any any such nomination should be to
>>> xml.apache.org.
>>
>> Reasons?
>
> The xml-axis project is a restructuring of xml-soap. This restructuring
> was initiated with the expressed
on 7/3/01 1:34 PM, "Ceki Gülcü" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We have a developer who would like to contribute a piece of code under the
> Apache software license but at the same time would like to keep using the same
> piece of code under a different (the original) license. I am sure
Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
>> I strongly believe that any any such nomination should be to
>> xml.apache.org.
>
> Reasons?
The xml-axis project is a restructuring of xml-soap. This restructuring
was initiated with the expressed intent of providing a foundation for
supporting multiple protocols, incl
Hello,
We have a developer who would like to contribute a piece of code under the Apache
software license but at the same time would like to keep using the same piece of code
under a different (the original) license. I am sure this not the first time this
happens. How did the foundation deal
Jason makes a very good point.
I believe we could see XML-RPC become a integral
component to other jakarta projects.
Terry McBride
--- Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/3/01 11:27 AM, "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > I strongly believe that any any such nomination
>
On 7/3/01 11:27 AM, "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I strongly believe that any any such nomination should be to
> xml.apache.org.
Reasons?
It does use XML, sure, but it is primarily a set of servers and
clients which I think fits in more with Jakarta. It's an XML
technology, but so is
Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I would like to propose the movement of the Helma XML-RCP package
> (http://xmlrpc.helma.org/) to Jakarta. The Helma XML-RPC package
> is the most popular OSS XML-RPC package and Hannes
> Wallnoefer would like to donate the code to the Jakarta project.
>
> T
on 7/3/01 7:19 AM, "Jason van Zyl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to propose the movement of the Helma XML-RCP package
> (http://xmlrpc.helma.org/) to Jakarta. The Helma XML-RPC package
> is the most popular OSS XML-RPC package and Hannes
> Wallnoefer would like to donate the code to
>I would like to propose the movement of the Helma XML-RCP package
>(http://xmlrpc.helma.org/) to Jakarta. The Helma XML-RPC package
>is the most popular OSS XML-RPC package and Hannes
>Wallnoefer would like to donate the code to the Jakarta project.
>
>There is an active community based around t
I strongly believe that any any such nomination should be to
xml.apache.org.
- Sam Ruby
Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 07/03/2001 10:19:36 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta
Hello,
I would like to propose the moveme
Hello,
I would like to propose the movement of the Helma XML-RCP package
(http://xmlrpc.helma.org/) to Jakarta. The Helma XML-RPC package
is the most popular OSS XML-RPC package and Hannes
Wallnoefer would like to donate the code to the Jakarta project.
There is an active community based around
18 matches
Mail list logo
