Re: [POLL] Future Of Turbine-JCS

2003-12-13 Thread Martin Poeschl
robert burrell donkin wrote: On 12 Dec 2003, at 09:28, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 21:07, robert burrell donkin wrote: hi henning you don't need to be a committer to act as a mentor. from what i've heard, i'd say that you'd be an ideal candidate :) Hi, thanks. :-)

Re: [POLL] Future Of Turbine-JCS

2003-12-05 Thread Martin Poeschl
Andrew C. Oliver wrote: So far it sounds to me like JCS is only used by Turbine and that only the Turbiners really care about it. it is indirectly used by turbine ... that's why the discussion started ... it is used by torque, ojb, hibernate, ok, they are all db related .. but i still do

Re: [POLL] Future Of Turbine-JCS

2003-12-04 Thread Martin Poeschl
Daniel Rall wrote: Henri Yandell wrote: On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, robert burrell donkin wrote: (i'm a little inclined towards db but) i'd support a proposal from the JCS team for a future in either db or jakarta (along the lines outlined above). guys - have you come to any opinions about what's the

Re: [POLL] Future Of Turbine-JCS

2003-12-02 Thread Martin Poeschl
[ ] leave it within turbine [ ] move it to apache commons [ ] move it to jakarta commons [ ] move it to incubator [ ] something else (please specify)... [1] move it to jakarta [2] move it to db from my point of view jcs should be a jakarta (or db)

Re: [PMC VOTE] PMC Nominations

2003-02-17 Thread Martin Poeschl
robert burrell donkin wrote: On Friday, February 14, 2003, at 12:26 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: Charles Burdick wrote: Selection criteria aside, I nominate Morgan for the PMC. Now that I think of it, let me just skim through the Jakarta-Announcements archive from various points last year. - Danny

Re: [Fwd: Maven as a top-level apache project]

2003-02-06 Thread Martin Poeschl
Steve Downey wrote: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 8:07 PM Subject: Re: [Fwd: Maven as a top-level apache project] BTW, given the license discussions it seems unlikely a solution that includes all the jars in the same

Re: [DRAFT2] Jakarta Newsletter - November 2002

2002-12-06 Thread Martin Poeschl
could you please add the following section about turbine? thanx Martin Turbine == The Turbine Team released the final releases of Turbine 2.2 and Torque 3.0. A list of changes can be found on the web-site http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine/turbine-2/changes.html

Re: Short Apache licence for source files

2002-12-04 Thread Martin Poeschl
Ceki Gülcü wrote: I was trying to convey that the word should has different meanings. It can be interpreted as a recommendation or alternatively as an obligation. For example, 1) One should brush one's teeth. Otherwise, you'll get bad teeth. However, not brushing your teeth does not make you a

Re: db@apache.org

2002-09-26 Thread Martin Poeschl
Ray Tayek wrote: hi, there was a general list for some new db stuff. but it seems to have moved. does anyone know where it lives these days? [EMAIL PROTECTED] martin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Database Subproject Discussion : creation of DBCommons ?

2002-05-03 Thread Martin Poeschl
James Strachan wrote: From: Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thu, 02 May 2002, Geir Magnusson, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Costin suggested, and I supported, that a subproject of wider scope be created to allow the collection of similar technologies into one larger subcommunity. First

summary: [New Subproject Proposal] ObjectBridge

2002-05-02 Thread Martin Poeschl
Jason van Zyl wrote: Hi, I would like to propose ObjectRelationalBridge (http://objectbridge.sourceforge.net/) as a top level subproject of Jakarta. the voting so far: Stefan Bodewig +1 Craig McClanahan +1 Diane Holt not voted yet Conor MacNeill +1 Geir Magnusson Jr. +1

Re: [New Subproject Proposal] ObjectBridge

2002-04-30 Thread Martin Poeschl
Jason van Zyl wrote: Hi, I would like to propose ObjectRelationalBridge (http://objectbridge.sourceforge.net/) as a top level subproject of Jakarta. For those not familiar with ObjectBridge it is arguably one of the most advanced persistence layers available, commercial or otherwise. It is

Re: [New Subproject Proposal] ObjectBridge

2002-04-30 Thread Martin Poeschl
Jon Scott Stevens wrote: on 4/30/02 11:11 AM, Gerhard Froehlich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PS: hmm curious if takes the jon hurdle ;-). +1. The proposal and project clearly meet ALL of the requirements set out on the newproject page. I would really like to see some sort of commitment

Re: [PATCH] /home/cvspublic/jakarta-site2/xdocs/site/mail2.xml

2002-01-18 Thread Martin Poeschl
Andrew C. Oliver wrote: Hi, I'm pretty sure this is the right place to post this. Just a little nit to pick. (Worse for Marc who wondered where his posts had gone to and why it wasn't refreshing). Changed it so that archive for commons points to the current archive and yet you can

Re: FAQ links...

2001-11-02 Thread Martin Poeschl
Pier Fumagalli wrote: Hey folks... I moved the OLD Jyve FAQ from daedalus to nagoya too (re, FreeBSD and it's VM don't go well along together, let's see if Solaris 8 can solve the intermittent VM crash problems). Can someone with some spare cycles change the links from