14, 2006 4:16 PM
To: Jakarta General List
Subject: Re: Jakarta stats
I've got interest but not activity so... Emeritize me!
(I enjoy lurking but haven't committed in 2 years. Haven't even checked to
see if I have a svn account yet :-))
- Alex Chaffee ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
(from http
I guess I consider myself to be a category 3:
3) People who are committer, did do some serious work and vanished.
The situation is simply that I am unable to work on Jakarta any
further. HttpClient is very very active and I am pleased that
development continues under the Apache umbrella.
Hi Jeff,
Jeff Dever wrote:
I guess I consider myself to be a category 3:
3) People who are committer, did do some serious work and vanished.
Hmm I miss the part about vanishing, you clearly are monitoring lists ?
The situation is simply that I am unable to work on Jakarta any
further.
My spam filter which dumps nearly all [EMAIL PROTECTED] email, does
keep messages with my name in them. Heh.
I'd take vanished to mean became invisible, which is what I had
become for some time before this thread started.
Emeritus status in Apache context is quite encompassing, which
I've got interest but not activity so... Emeritize me!
(I enjoy lurking but haven't committed in 2 years. Haven't even checked to
see if I have a svn account yet :-))
- Alex Chaffee ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
(from http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html)
Emeritus
A term used to
|
| cc:
|
| Subject: RE: Jakarta stats
Martin wrote:
The result can be a couple of things (probably depending on the response)
:
- Vote on them (?)
I think the most straightforward thing is simply to announce that a vote
will be held for which the rules are that more than a quorum of +1's and no
-1's are required to remove a PMC
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
The result can be a couple of things (probably depending on the
response) :
- Leave it as is
- Move them to emuritus
Above two are the only acceptable choices for folks with valid
accounts. We can discuss means
I'm one of the 1) Inactive PMC members : 39
For historical reasons I made it onto this PMC just as the project I was
really involved with (James) got promoted to TLP.
I hung around to try to help make sure that Jakarta didn't die as a result
of all the reorganisation, and wasn't killed
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Danny Angus wrote:
I'm one of the 1) Inactive PMC members : 39
For historical reasons I made it onto this PMC just as the project I was
really involved with (James) got promoted to TLP.
I hung around to try to help make sure that Jakarta didn't die as a result
of
On 1/12/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
-=-=-=-=
Mostly I'm worried about:
PMC members who are not on pmc@ (there's a handful)
PMC members who are not on general@ (never looked. I will soon)
Inactive committers who are not on the PMC (200+)
snap/
s/Inactive/Active/ ?
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 1/12/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
-=-=-=-=
Mostly I'm worried about:
PMC members who are not on pmc@ (there's a handful)
PMC members who are not on general@ (never looked. I will soon)
Inactive committers who are not on
On 1/12/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Danny Angus wrote:
I'm one of the 1) Inactive PMC members : 39
For historical reasons I made it onto this PMC just as the project I was
really involved with (James) got promoted to TLP.
I hung around
Danny Angus wrote:
I'm one of the 1) Inactive PMC members
Define inactive. Inactive as a committer? Inactive as a PMC member
providing oversight to Jakarta projects? I'm in the former category, as are
many, but I still actively monitor several project lists, even if I only
post when I have
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Danny Angus wrote:
I'm one of the 1) Inactive PMC members
Define inactive. Inactive as a committer? Inactive as a PMC member
providing oversight to Jakarta projects? I'm in the former category, as are
many, but I still actively monitor several project lists, even
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
The result can be a couple of things (probably depending on the response) :
- Leave it as is
- Move them to emuritus
Above two are the only acceptable choices for folks with valid accounts. We can
discuss means and mechanisms of moving to emeritus and back, but
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
The result can be a couple of things (probably depending on the
response) :
- Leave it as is
- Move them to emuritus
Above two are the only acceptable choices for folks with valid accounts.
We can discuss means and mechanisms of moving
Robert got me looking at various Jakarta stats in a recent email of his.
Gave me something to do while I waited for a plane at 5am this morning :)
So, here's a dump of stats. A committer is defined as somebody with svn
access.
316 committers in Jakarta.
107 on PMC, 209 not on PMC.
8349
18 matches
Mail list logo
