Re: The future of java-icalendar

2002-01-28 Thread Andrew C. Oliver

On Sun, 2002-01-27 at 23:17, Peter Donald wrote:
 Hi,
 
 On Mon, 21 Jan 2002 07:38, Jeff Prickett wrote:
  I would like to name the project Periodicity.
  I would like to utilize the EJB architecture and support most of the
  major EJB containers starting with JBoss of course.
  I would like to use JUnit to write Unit Tests for the project
 
 I would highly recomend you have a look at XDoclet stuff (on sourceforge) 
 aswell ... (Im just reading through the docs and it is brilliant).
 
  I have begun writing the project guidelines and have started building
  the project website.
  I have rewritten the API to take full advantage of Java 2 Enterprise
  Edition.
  I have saved the email addresses of most of the people who have emailed
  me regarding the icalendar project in the last year.
  I have begun personally responding to email inquiries about icalendar.
 
  My questions are this:
  Would ASF accept my sincere apology and work with me to help make the
  project viable?
 
 I doubt the ASF holds grudges ;) and a fully operationaly ICalendar compliant 
 product would be a very good addition to Jakarta. The problem mainly is that 
 you don't have a community about your product. While it used to be a product 
 at java apache you would effectively be proposing a new project. And 
 accoridng to the guidelines at
 
 http://jakarta.apache.org/site/newproject.html
 
 you don't yet satisfy them.
 
 So what I would suggest you do is propose/add the product to the commons 
 sandbox. When it becomes stable enough you can propose it be moved to commons 
 proper and when you get a large enough community about it you can propose it 
 to be a top-level jakarta project.
 
  Would periodicity be an acceptable name for the project?
 
 It's up to you but I like it ;)
 
  Can I base the iCalendar objects on EJB technologies?
 
 You *can* but I suspect it will make your job of attracting a community 
 harder. It would be much more widely useful if it did not require EJB 
 technologies and I suspect iy would thus be much easier to attract more 
 developers. If at all possible I would suggest making it run in non-EJB 
 environments but thats completely up to you ;)
 

+1, proper encapsulation should include EJB functionality for those who
desire it while not requiring it for those who do not.  There is also a
matter of licensing involved there.  

  Is the IBM Public License compatible with Apache license? (Can I use
  Junit for testing?).
 
 Yep - this is fine and plenty of other projects use Junit at Apache (Just 
 remember to put the license into the CVS).
 
 Anyways good luck - I hope you decide to stay and hopefully it will get 
 enough exposure and a big enough community to get it off and going ;)
 
 -- 
 Cheers,
 
 Pete
 
 *--*
 | Computers are useless. They can only give you   |
 |answers. - Pablo Picasso |
 *--*
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
-- 
www.superlinksoftware.com
www.sourceforge.net/projects/poi - port of Excel format to java
http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4487555.html 
- fix java generics!


The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to
vote.
-Ambassador Kosh


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: The future of java-icalendar

2002-01-28 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.

On 1/28/02 6:37 AM, Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Sun, 2002-01-27 at 23:17, Peter Donald wrote:
 Hi,
 
 On Mon, 21 Jan 2002 07:38, Jeff Prickett wrote:
 
 Can I base the iCalendar objects on EJB technologies?
 
 You *can* but I suspect it will make your job of attracting a community
 harder. It would be much more widely useful if it did not require EJB
 technologies and I suspect iy would thus be much easier to attract more
 developers. If at all possible I would suggest making it run in non-EJB
 environments but thats completely up to you ;)
 
 
 +1, proper encapsulation should include EJB functionality for those who
 desire it while not requiring it for those who do not.  There is also a
 matter of licensing involved there.
 

What matter of licensing would that be?  I can't imagine that you need to
talk to sun to *use* EJBs

-- 
Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
System and Software Consulting
Be a giant.  Take giant steps.  Do giant things...


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: The future of java-icalendar

2002-01-28 Thread Jeff Prickett

Peter Donald wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 On Mon, 21 Jan 2002 07:38, Jeff Prickett wrote:
  I would like to name the project Periodicity.
  I would like to utilize the EJB architecture and support most of the
  major EJB containers starting with JBoss of course.
  I would like to use JUnit to write Unit Tests for the project
 
 I would highly recomend you have a look at XDoclet stuff (on sourceforge)
 aswell ... (Im just reading through the docs and it is brilliant).

  I have begun writing the project guidelines and have started building
  the project website.
  I have rewritten the API to take full advantage of Java 2 Enterprise
  Edition.
  I have saved the email addresses of most of the people who have emailed
  me regarding the icalendar project in the last year.
  I have begun personally responding to email inquiries about icalendar.
 
  My questions are this:
  Would ASF accept my sincere apology and work with me to help make the
  project viable?
 
 I doubt the ASF holds grudges ;) and a fully operationaly ICalendar compliant
 product would be a very good addition to Jakarta. The problem mainly is that
 you don't have a community about your product. While it used to be a product
 at java apache you would effectively be proposing a new project. And
 accoridng to the guidelines at


When I quit programming at ASF it wasnt really a decision I made to
quit. It was more like things kept keeping me from contributing. After a
while I became to self-consicous to try and come back. Then ASF servers
were hacked and I could not even logon as all passwords had been
changed.
 
 http://jakarta.apache.org/site/newproject.html
 
 you don't yet satisfy them.
 
 So what I would suggest you do is propose/add the product to the commons
 sandbox. When it becomes stable enough you can propose it be moved to commons
 proper and when you get a large enough community about it you can propose it
 to be a top-level jakarta project.


I will formally propose that they be added today, later in the day.
 
  Would periodicity be an acceptable name for the project?
 
 It's up to you but I like it ;)
 
  Can I base the iCalendar objects on EJB technologies?
 
 You *can* but I suspect it will make your job of attracting a community
 harder. It would be much more widely useful if it did not require EJB
 technologies and I suspect iy would thus be much easier to attract more
 developers. If at all possible I would suggest making it run in non-EJB
 environments but thats completely up to you ;)


I had a hard time deciding this myself and am not sure that EJB is the
way to go, but part of me wants to push the envelope with this. 

It goes back to a lesson I learned about a year and a half ago when I
was still working. Do not be ignorant of industry trends. One of my
reasons for wanting to use EJB is that
I dont want people to outgrow the product. I have gotten a wide range of
responses from all types of people from college students all over the
world to IT professionals at large corporations and everywhere in
between.

If I chose EJB I am probably going to spend a lot of time explaining it
to newcomers, it is a lot more complicated than non-EJB, but it will be
based on what is fast becoming the industry standard for server side
components.

To be honest I am not sure, but I might try EJB if no one bites than I
might have to 
rethink my strategy.

 
  Is the IBM Public License compatible with Apache license? (Can I use
  Junit for testing?).
 
 Yep - this is fine and plenty of other projects use Junit at Apache (Just
 remember to put the license into the CVS).

 Anyways good luck - I hope you decide to stay and hopefully it will get
 enough exposure and a big enough community to get it off and going ;)
 
 --
 Cheers,
 
 Pete
 
 *--*
 | Computers are useless. They can only give you   |
 |answers. - Pablo Picasso |
 *--*
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: 

Thanks for the words of encouragement. Back to programming for me.

Sincerely,
Jeff Prickett

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: The future of java-icalendar

2002-01-28 Thread Andrew C. Oliver

J2EE stuff has a different license than the JDK.  I've been told
conflicting things about what you can distribute.  Most of it sounds
bogus.  I've read the license but you can read it a few different ways. 
Basically I would think provided you do not extend the APIs (not meaning
the keyword extends...) you should be fine as long as you don't
distribute any components of the J2EE.

Thats AFAIK.

-Andy

On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 06:49, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
 On 1/28/02 6:37 AM, Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  On Sun, 2002-01-27 at 23:17, Peter Donald wrote:
  Hi,
  
  On Mon, 21 Jan 2002 07:38, Jeff Prickett wrote:
  
  Can I base the iCalendar objects on EJB technologies?
  
  You *can* but I suspect it will make your job of attracting a community
  harder. It would be much more widely useful if it did not require EJB
  technologies and I suspect iy would thus be much easier to attract more
  developers. If at all possible I would suggest making it run in non-EJB
  environments but thats completely up to you ;)
  
  
  +1, proper encapsulation should include EJB functionality for those who
  desire it while not requiring it for those who do not.  There is also a
  matter of licensing involved there.
  
 
 What matter of licensing would that be?  I can't imagine that you need to
 talk to sun to *use* EJBs
 
 -- 
 Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 System and Software Consulting
 Be a giant.  Take giant steps.  Do giant things...
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
-- 
www.superlinksoftware.com
www.sourceforge.net/projects/poi - port of Excel format to java
http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4487555.html 
- fix java generics!


The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to
vote.
-Ambassador Kosh


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: The future of java-icalendar

2002-01-28 Thread Jeff Prickett

Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
 
 On Sun, 2002-01-27 at 23:17, Peter Donald wrote:
snip previous converstaion
 +1, proper encapsulation should include EJB functionality for those who
 desire it while not requiring it for those who do not.  There is also a
 matter of licensing involved there.
 

Thanks, I guess you are right. Requiring EJB is quite a lot.

I would like to take this time to formally request that the
java-icalendar module be moved over to the jakarta-commons sandbox and
that my apache commiter account be reinstated so that I can commit the
new code into cvs.

Once we have the new source code in place I will contact all the people
who have emailed me about the project over the last year and tell them
to join the commons mailing list if they are still interested.

In the meantime I will be preparing the website with an initial set of
project guidelines, documentation, and continuing to work on the code.

Thanks for your input. Now back to listening

Jeff Prickett

snip some more
 www.superlinksoftware.com
 www.sourceforge.net/projects/poi - port of Excel format to java
 http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4487555.html
 - fix java generics!
 
 The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to
 vote.
 -Ambassador Kosh
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




The future of java-icalendar

2002-01-27 Thread Jeff Prickett


Hello Apache Software Foundation Community:

I have previously donated a large chunk of time to starting the
java-icalendar module which I had to stop maintaining about a year ago.
This was because of personal reasons. I would like to publicly apologize
to the ASF for not continuing the project.

I would like to restart the project and take the initial steps to make
java-icalendar a full-fledged jakarta project. During the last month I
have begun rewriting the icalendar module to get it ready for release. 

I would like to name the project Periodicity.
I would like to utilize the EJB architecture and support most of the
major EJB containers starting with JBoss of course.
I would like to use JUnit to write Unit Tests for the project

I have begun writing the project guidelines and have started building
the project website.
I have rewritten the API to take full advantage of Java 2 Enterprise
Edition.
I have saved the email addresses of most of the people who have emailed
me regarding the icalendar project in the last year.
I have begun personally responding to email inquiries about icalendar.

My questions are this:
Would ASF accept my sincere apology and work with me to help make the
project viable?
Would periodicity be an acceptable name for the project?
Can I base the iCalendar objects on EJB technologies?
Is the IBM Public License compatible with Apache license? (Can I use
Junit for testing?).

You can take a peak at the revamped code base at
http://www.shpimp.com/apache.

Thanks All...

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]