Jon Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 2/18/01 12:27 AM, "Federico Barbieri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> That's fine with me.
>>
>> so let's ge for
>>
>> jakarta-avalon
>> jakarta-avalon-phoenix
>> jakarta-avalon-cornerstone
>>
>> Is it ok with everybody?
>>
>> Fede
>
> +1
>
> (g
on 2/18/01 12:27 AM, "Federico Barbieri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's fine with me.
>
> so let's ge for
>
> jakarta-avalon
> jakarta-avalon-phoenix
> jakarta-avalon-cornerstone
>
> Is it ok with everybody?
>
> Fede
+1
(going round and round and round...)
-jon
Jon Stevens wrote:
>
> on 2/14/01 2:38 PM, "Federico Barbieri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> Ok, so can we agree on this:
> >>
> >> /home/cvs/jakarta-avalon-foo
> >> /home/cvs/jakarta-avalon-bar
> >> /home/cvs/jakarta-avalon-whatever
> >> /home/cvs/jakarta-avalon-peter
> >> /home/cvs/jakarta
on 2/17/01 4:06 PM, "Peter Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> kewl but they will have to vote me access first ;)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Pete
avail|brian,duncan,jon,donaldp,charlesb,serge,fede,bburns|jakarta-james
Nope. You already have access.
-jon
--
If you come from a Perl or PHP background,
Peter Donald wrote:
>
> kewl but they will have to vote me access first ;)
Sending a patch is the usual first step Luckily they have something that
needs fixed that should be right up your alley...
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscribe
At 03:53 17/2/01 -0500, Sam Ruby wrote:
>Peter Donald wrote:
>>
>> If you like I could help keep them synched?
>
>Peter, I took the liberty of subscribing you to the james-dev mailing list.
>This means that you will get daily reminders until they are synched again.
>;-)
kewl but they will have t
Peter Donald wrote:
>
> If you like I could help keep them synched?
Peter, I took the liberty of subscribing you to the james-dev mailing list.
This means that you will get daily reminders until they are synched again.
;-)
- Sam Ruby
Peter Donald wrote:
> If you like I could help keep them synched?
Excellent!
> I think it got too many deprecation messages and busted the compiler/ant.
It is hard to see find the errors in the midst of of all the warnings. Here they are.
[javac]
D:\jakarta\jakarta-james\build\src\org\a
At 04:08 13/2/01 +, Charles Benett wrote:
>Hmm. Good idea, but I can't see it working for james, yet. There aren't
>enough active james developers to keep up with daily changes in avalon.
>James runs fine with the last release of Avalon, 3.1a1.
If you like I could help keep them synched?
Ch
At 09:27 12/2/01 +, Charles Benett wrote:
>>
>>http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2001-02-11/james.html
>
>Strange, it wasn't a couple of days ago. And deprecating interfaces
>shouldn't break a build.
I think it got too many deprecation messages and busted the compiler/ant.
Will have
on 2/14/01 2:38 PM, "Federico Barbieri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ok, so can we agree on this:
>>
>> /home/cvs/jakarta-avalon-foo
>> /home/cvs/jakarta-avalon-bar
>> /home/cvs/jakarta-avalon-whatever
>> /home/cvs/jakarta-avalon-peter
>> /home/cvs/jakarta-avalon-federico
>> /home/cvs/jakarta-a
Jon Stevens wrote:
>
> on 2/12/01 1:33 PM, "Federico Barbieri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > That's exactly why I want to split java.apache.avalon into three CVS!
> >
> > API (design patterns, interfaces, contracts etc. have a very different
> > lifecycle from the framework implementation and
Charles Bennett wrote:
>
> Hmm. Good idea, but I can't see it working for james, yet.
> There aren't enough active james developers to keep up
> with daily changes in avalon. James runs fine with the
> last release of Avalon, 3.1a1.
As an old commercial used to say "you can pay me now, or you can
Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> Charles Benett wrote:
> >
> > Strange, it wasn't a couple of days ago. And deprecating
> > interfaces shouldn't break a build.
>
> Eventually, a change was made that was not backwards compatible.
>
> > When i get a chance. Can you be more specific as to what
> > is broken?
on 2/12/01 1:33 PM, "Federico Barbieri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's exactly why I want to split java.apache.avalon into three CVS!
>
> API (design patterns, interfaces, contracts etc. have a very different
> lifecycle from the framework implementation and it's critical to the
> health of
Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> It looks like Avalon has been steadily deprecating interfaces that James
> has been depending on. Now James is broken.
>
>http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2001-02-11/james.html
>
> Who wants to volunteer to look into it?
>
> Standard reason: if one wants to depl
Charles Benett wrote:
>
> Strange, it wasn't a couple of days ago. And deprecating
> interfaces shouldn't break a build.
Eventually, a change was made that was not backwards compatible.
> When i get a chance. Can you be more specific as to what
> is broken?
Thanks! Sure:
http://jakarta.apache
Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> It looks like Avalon has been steadily deprecating interfaces that James
> has been depending on.
These interfaces and classes were only deprecated between Avalon 3.0a4
and Avalon 3.1a1.
> Now James is broken.
>
>http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2001-02-11/james
It looks like Avalon has been steadily deprecating interfaces that James
has been depending on. Now James is broken.
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2001-02-11/james.html
Who wants to volunteer to look into it?
Standard reason: if one wants to deploy a server solution involving
multip
19 matches
Mail list logo
