On 1/04/2003 23:21 Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
And we need to work on implementing a CMM process for opensource. The
SDLC seems like an excellent way to do that. If we can get developers
working along the SDLC, I think we could get a more repeatable
development process. Far superior to
We should not 'stimulate' developers to work along
SDLC, just fire them if they don't.
Why don't we just outsource the whole thing? then we don't need to really manage the
project but we can *still* fire them if they don't give us what we want, whether its
reasonable or not.
Better yet why
On 2/04/2003 12:35 Danny Angus wrote:
Better yet why don't we hand all our IT over to IBMGS then we don't
ever need to ask for anything or fire anyone because IBMGS will do it
all for us according to our IT policy which they will even kindly
write for us.
Dear sir,
I'm not in the position to
Would it help if someone makes this an out-of-the-blue business
requirement or policy? This consensus-through-discussion stuff is
really slowing us down. We should not 'stimulate' developers to work
along SDLC, just fire them if they don't.
The requirements can't be change until the next
We really need to a submit a JSR to define an API to process these RFS
tickets...
Humm...I'm thinking of a much better idea for next year ;-)
Steven Noels wrote:
On 2/04/2003 12:35 Danny Angus wrote:
Better yet why don't we hand all our IT over to IBMGS then we don't
ever need to ask for
I hereby appoint myself Chief Architect. As my first act, I have
completed our High Level Architecture. Here it is:
---
- SuperXMailer - - - Other stuff -
---
Rose .mdl files will be posted to [insert expensive
On Wednesday, April 2, 2003, at 09:32 AM, Tom Copeland wrote:
I hereby appoint myself Chief Architect. As my first act, I have
completed our High Level Architecture. Here it is:
---
- SuperXMailer - - - Other stuff -
Hi All,
I'm pleased to finally propose the SuperXMailer for Jakarta via the
incubator. I'd like for the Jakarta PMC/committers to vote a tacit
approval of the project before we work on acceptance into the
incubator. I'm sure that despite the inevitable controversy, folks will
see a true
On 1/04/2003 22:03 Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
I'm pleased to finally propose the SuperXMailer for Jakarta via the
incubator.
:-D
Nice one!
/Steven
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java XML Competence Support Center
Read my weblog at
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Hi All,
I'm pleased to finally propose the SuperXMailer for Jakarta via the
incubator. I'd like for the Jakarta PMC/committers to vote a tacit
approval of the project before we work on acceptance into the
incubator. I'm sure that despite the inevitable controversy,
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Tuesday, April 1, 2003, at 03:21 PM, Tom Copeland wrote:
+1 if I could just think of a BUSINESS PROPOSAL that could put this to
use
Let me help you get started:
Hello honored sir, my name is Mkwila Mnembi, and I am the
I'm +1 to Andrew's proposal. I think it is terrible that there is not an
enterprise class open source solution in this field. All those poor
businessmen, using hacked together solutions or proprietary technologies.
To make success inevitable, let's start by drawing a bunch of UML
diagrams!
Nice one, made my day :-)
d.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew C. Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 April 2003 21:03
To: Jakarta General List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Proposal] SuperXMailer
Hi All,
I'm pleased to finally propose the SuperXMailer for Jakarta via
Interested in being a committer? Just add your name!
Steven Noels wrote:
On 1/04/2003 22:03 Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
I'm pleased to finally propose the SuperXMailer for Jakarta via the
incubator.
:-D
Nice one!
/Steven
To make success inevitable, let's start by drawing a bunch of UML
diagrams!
And we need to work on implementing a CMM process for opensource. The
SDLC seems like an excellent way to do that. If we can get developers
working along the SDLC, I think we could get a more repeatable
eb site and additional examples.
[2] identify the initial source from which the project is to
be populated
The project currently resides on the SourceForge
(http://tapestry.sf.net).
My wife says I sometimes code in my sleep. Now I know what I've been up-to
:-)
Gotta watch that
You did actually create a sourceforge project for this joke ?
Costin
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Hi All,
I'm pleased to finally propose the SuperXMailer for Jakarta via the
incubator. I'd like for the Jakarta PMC/committers to vote a tacit
approval of the project before we work on
:-D I created the sourceforge project months and months ago! With full
disclosure as to its purpose.
-Andy
Costin Manolache wrote:
You did actually create a sourceforge project for this joke ?
Costin
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Hi All,
I'm pleased to finally propose the SuperXMailer for
You've spent months planning an April Fool's joke?
On Tuesday, April 1, 2003, at 08:12 PM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
:-D I created the sourceforge project months and months ago! With
full disclosure as to its purpose.
-Andy
Costin Manolache wrote:
You did actually create a sourceforge
Its april fools day?
I spent 5 minutes, months ago...
-Andy
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
You've spent months planning an April Fool's joke?
On Tuesday, April 1, 2003, at 08:12 PM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
:-D I created the sourceforge project months and months ago! With
full disclosure as to
All,
In order to minimise the possibility of brand overloading or brand
segmentation I propose that we introduce the standard community building
techniques.
So to this end I propose the immediate creation of
* a wiki to capture all this valuable discussion
* a set of blogs so that members of
on 2003/4/1 6:08 PM, Ben Walding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is called value-adding in
the commercial world. Some of you communist coding hippies may not have
heard of this.
Of course there is no value in open source since it is all free. =)
-jon
--
BU**
SH**
22 matches
Mail list logo
