Re: [Request for Comment] Http Components proposal

2005-10-20 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 11:42:47PM -0400, Henri Yandell wrote: > > Oleg, did Robert's bits all get into the charter? > > Can I go ahead and call a vote? > > The usual apologies for my slowness in returning back to the thread. I > need to kick myself into spending the next couple of days sending

Re: [Request for Comment] Http Components proposal

2005-10-19 Thread Henri Yandell
Oleg, did Robert's bits all get into the charter? Can I go ahead and call a vote? The usual apologies for my slowness in returning back to the thread. I need to kick myself into spending the next couple of days sending out Jakarta email on various threads. Hen On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Oleg Kaln

Re: [Request for Comment] Http Components proposal

2005-10-06 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 10:51:24AM +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote: > just a few more from me: > > * Jakarta Http Components continues the development of Jakarta > HttpClient (formerly Jakarta Commons HttpClient ) based on the toolset > of HTTP components. This tool focuses strictly on the

Re: [Request for Comment] Http Components proposal

2005-10-06 Thread robert burrell donkin
just a few more from me: * Jakarta Http Components continues the development of Jakarta HttpClient (formerly Jakarta Commons HttpClient ) based on the toolset of HTTP components. This tool focuses strictly on the client side of HTTP. -> * Jakarta Http Components continues the development of

Re: [Request for Comment] Http Components proposal

2005-10-05 Thread Henri Yandell
Any more comments before I call a vote? Hen On Sat, 24 Sep 2005, Henri Yandell wrote: Prior to calling a PMC vote here in a week or two, I'd like to ask if anybody has any comments on the following proposal for Commons HttpClient to become a Jakarta subproject focusing on Http components.

Re: [Request for Comment] Http Components proposal

2005-09-26 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 11:06:58AM -0400, Henri Yandell wrote: > > > On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: > > >On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 11:30:02PM +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote: > >> > >>IMHO if this is the vision then it would be better to rephrase the final > >>clause to make this

Re: [Request for Comment] Http Components proposal

2005-09-26 Thread Henri Yandell
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 11:30:02PM +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote: IMHO if this is the vision then it would be better to rephrase the final clause to make this clear. maybe something like: * Jakarta Http Components will provide ONLY a toolse

Re: [Request for Comment] Http Components proposal

2005-09-26 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 11:30:02PM +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote: > On Sun, 2005-09-25 at 12:27 +0200, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: > > On Sat, 2005-09-24 at 20:34 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote: > > > On 9/24/05, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ... > > > > * Jakarta Http Components MUST

RE: [Request for Comment] Http Components proposal

2005-09-25 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> The plan is to factor the multipart content handling out > of HttpClient. There's already a project in Commons > Sandbox led by Mark R. Diggory [for] that end. Unfortunately > the project has been dormant for quite some time See also: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/mime4j --- No

Re: [Request for Comment] Http Components proposal

2005-09-25 Thread robert burrell donkin
On Sun, 2005-09-25 at 12:27 +0200, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: > On Sat, 2005-09-24 at 20:34 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote: > > On 9/24/05, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... > > > * Jakarta Http Components MUST be content agnostic. The project DOES NOT > > > develop components intended to pr

Re: [Request for Comment] Http Components proposal

2005-09-25 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
On Sat, 2005-09-24 at 20:34 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote: > On 9/24/05, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... > > * Jakarta Http Components MUST be content agnostic. The project DOES NOT > > develop components intended to produce or consume content of HTTP > > messages. > > > While I underst

Re: [Request for Comment] Http Components proposal

2005-09-24 Thread Martin Cooper
On 9/24/05, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Prior to calling a PMC vote here in a week or two, I'd like to ask if > anybody has any comments on the following proposal for Commons > HttpClient to become a Jakarta subproject focusing on Http components. > > Hen > >

[Request for Comment] Http Components proposal

2005-09-24 Thread Henri Yandell
Prior to calling a PMC vote here in a week or two, I'd like to ask if anybody has any comments on the following proposal for Commons HttpClient to become a Jakarta subproject focusing on Http components. Hen * (The followin