- Original Message -
From: Ted Leung [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 10:12 AM
Subject: [RFC] Re: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta
Does anyone else from xml.apache.org have any feedback on this proposal
one way or the other?
Ted
PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 10:12 AM
Subject: [RFC] Re: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta
Does anyone else from xml.apache.org have any feedback on this proposal
one way or the other?
Ted
- Original Message -
From: Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL
-
From: Ted Leung [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 10:12 AM
Subject: [RFC] Re: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta
Does anyone else from xml.apache.org have any feedback on this proposal
one way or the other?
Ted
- Original Message -
From: Sam Ruby
On 7/5/01 9:09 PM, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Fair enough, I will no longer argue the point. My main concern is that
the project be granted full autonomy as a project initially as Hannes
and the rest of the committers become accustomed to xml.apache.org than
we
One caveat. Let the XML PMC have it's vote on this. I'm sending the vote
request in 2 minutes.
Ted
- Original Message -
From: Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 6:54 AM
Subject: Re: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta
On 7/5/01 9:09 PM, Sam Ruby
, July 06, 2001 6:54 AM
Subject: Re: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta
On 7/5/01 9:09 PM, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Fair enough, I will no longer argue the point. My main concern is that
the project be granted full autonomy as a project initially as Hannes
and the rest
Hannes Wallnoefer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To put it right upfront, I don't think XML-RPC is a natural fit for
xml.apache.org, and I'd prefer to see it at Jakarta. Let me explain.
Even though I see your point, I'd still prefer seeing it over in XML
alongside with the other technologies
On 7/5/01 7:55 AM, Pier P. Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hannes Wallnoefer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To put it right upfront, I don't think XML-RPC is a natural fit for
xml.apache.org, and I'd prefer to see it at Jakarta. Let me explain.
Even though I see your point, I'd still
On 7/5/01 7:55 AM, Pier P. Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hannes Wallnoefer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To put it right upfront, I don't think XML-RPC is a natural fit for
xml.apache.org, and I'd prefer to see it at Jakarta. Let me explain.
Even though I see your point, I'd still
with Axis.
Does this sound reasonable?
Ted Leung
Chair XML PMC
- Original Message -
From: Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 7:18 AM
Subject: Re: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta
On 7/5/01 7:55 AM, Pier P. Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED
I believed that xml.apache.org was the appropriate place to try first,
and if it can find a happy home there, I still think thats appropriate.
However, this is a living community, not just a code base - Hannes and
co-conspirators are coming with it. Therefore, I think top level in xml
would be
on 7/5/01 5:52 PM, Pier P. Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, one day I'll change it (also because it generates 70% of the traffic on
daedalus!)
And because CollabNet has to pay for that...
-jon
-
To unsubscribe,
[ ]Jon Stevens
-0
It seems like xml.apache.org should be the place, but I really don't care
where it lives that much cause we can always move projects around if we need
to. I do think that if it goes to xml.apache.org it should be a top level
project.
I feel about the same. xml.apache.org
Jon Stevens at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 7/5/01 5:52 PM, Pier P. Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, one day I'll change it (also because it generates 70% of the traffic on
daedalus!)
And because CollabNet has to pay for that...
Comes straight out of your paycheck? :) :) :)
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Fair enough, I will no longer argue the point. My main concern is that
the project be granted full autonomy as a project initially as Hannes
and the rest of the committers become accustomed to xml.apache.org than
we can discuss the possible integration with Axis.
Does
05, 2001 7:18 AM
Subject: Re: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta
On 7/5/01 7:55 AM, Pier P. Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hannes Wallnoefer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To put it right upfront, I don't think XML-RPC is a natural fit for
xml.apache.org, and I'd prefer to see it at Jakarta. Let
On Wednesday, July 4, 2001, at 05:19 AM, Ian Kallen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
My unsolicited opinion: projects focused on the manipulation and
purveyance of
data as XML could/should belong in the xml.apache.org project while
implementations of Java technologies associate with Jakarta.
PROTECTED]
Antworten an: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Datum: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 20:13:07 +0100
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta
On Wednesday, July 4, 2001, at 05:19 AM, Ian Kallen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
My unsolicited opinion: projects focused on the manipulation and
purveyance
Hannes Wallnoefer wrote:
[snip]
Short and simple: -1. Good luck getting 3/4 approval...
Want to change my vote? Demonstrate some signs that you are willing to
work with others, or are at least aware of related work. Criticize SOAP or
the Apache implementation thereof if you like - I can
On 7/4/01 10:04 PM, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hannes Wallnoefer wrote:
[snip]
Short and simple: -1. Good luck getting 3/4 approval...
Want to change my vote?
I don't think there's anything to change. You decided what you what
you wanted very shortly after the proposal was
I strongly believe that any any such nomination should be to
xml.apache.org.
- Sam Ruby
Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 07/03/2001 10:19:36 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta
Hello,
I would like to propose the movement
I would like to propose the movement of the Helma XML-RCP package
(http://xmlrpc.helma.org/) to Jakarta. The Helma XML-RPC package
is the most popular OSS XML-RPC package and Hannes
Wallnoefer would like to donate the code to the Jakarta project.
There is an active community based around the
on 7/3/01 7:19 AM, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to propose the movement of the Helma XML-RCP package
(http://xmlrpc.helma.org/) to Jakarta. The Helma XML-RPC package
is the most popular OSS XML-RPC package and Hannes
Wallnoefer would like to donate the code to the
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hello,
I would like to propose the movement of the Helma XML-RCP package
(http://xmlrpc.helma.org/) to Jakarta. The Helma XML-RPC package
is the most popular OSS XML-RPC package and Hannes
Wallnoefer would like to donate the code to the Jakarta project.
There is
Jason makes a very good point.
I believe we could see XML-RPC become a integral
component to other jakarta projects.
Terry McBride
--- Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/3/01 11:27 AM, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I strongly believe that any any such nomination
should be
Jason van Zyl wrote:
I strongly believe that any any such nomination should be to
xml.apache.org.
Reasons?
The xml-axis project is a restructuring of xml-soap. This restructuring
was initiated with the expressed intent of providing a foundation for
supporting multiple protocols, including,
On 7/3/01 4:36 PM, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
I strongly believe that any any such nomination should be to
xml.apache.org.
Reasons?
The xml-axis project is a restructuring of xml-soap. This restructuring
was initiated with the expressed intent of
Sam Ruby at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I strongly believe that any any such nomination should be to
xml.apache.org.
I agree 100% with Sam...
Pier
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
Jason van Zyl wrote:
I think that was a knee jerk reaction to seeing XML in the project name.
Fair enough. You've had two people so far.
Not fair. I can't speak for others, but I am an active committer on
xml-soap and xml-apache (two different projects only in the sense that
Tomcat 3 and 4
On 7/3/01 8:10 PM, Pier P. Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sam Ruby at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I strongly believe that any any such nomination should be to
xml.apache.org.
I agree 100% with Sam...
Again, that's an unqualified response. I responsed to Sam when he
clarified his
Jason van Zyl wrote:
You have totally side stepped the fact that no at xml.apache.org is
interested in XML-RPC. What exactly is the interest level in
XML-RPC? I honestly don't know a whole lot about SOAP, but I have
been using XML-RPC for a long while now and it's simple and works
great.
On 7/3/01 8:56 PM, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
You have totally side stepped the fact that no at xml.apache.org is
interested in XML-RPC. What exactly is the interest level in
XML-RPC? I honestly don't know a whole lot about SOAP, but I have
been using XML-RPC
32 matches
Mail list logo
