Re: Jakarta Newsletter - May 2002

Great stuff! +1 How would you like us to submit articles/notes to you? On 6/5/02 9:57 AM, "Rob Oxspring" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jakarta Newsletter > == > Issue: 0 > Date: May 2002 > [SNIP] -- Geir Magnusson Jr. Research & Development, Adeptra Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1

RE: Jakarta Newsletter - May 2002

1 AM > To: 'Jakarta General List' > Subject: RE: Jakarta Newsletter - May 2002 > > > Thanks Erik, > > I think its gonna take a few of us keeping it high priority to get the > ball rolling properly - it took me long enough to get around to this one > (though wh

RE: Jakarta Newsletter - May 2002

+1 Paulo > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 8:42 AM > To: Jakarta General List > Subject: Re: Jakarta Newsletter - May 2002 > > > On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, Peter Donald wrote: > > > I wou

Re: Jakarta Newsletter - May 2002

+1 on no biding peer review But the sequence of events Pier suggested seems fine (1) The volunteer list editors post submissions to the general list and copy their own DEV list. [NEWS] July 2002 - Struts (2) The volunteer newsletter editor collects the submissions together and sends it out

Re: Jakarta Newsletter - May 2002

On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, Peter Donald wrote: > I would actually prefer no peer review (or at least no binding peer > review). If people want to have a say what goes into it then they should > get off their butts and write something for it ;) +1 Costin > > I am sure that the writers will be at re

Re: Jakarta Newsletter - May 2002

From: "Peter Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I would actually prefer no peer review (or at least no binding peer > review). If people want to have a say what goes into it then they should > get off their butts and write something for it ;) +1 Great job, hope you keep hanging on ;-) -- Nicola

Re: Jakarta Newsletter - May 2002

Cool Great effort...thanks. -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Work: http://www.multitask.com.au Developers: http://adslgateway.multitask.com.au/developers -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: Jakarta Newsletter - May 2002

I would actually prefer no peer review (or at least no binding peer review). If people want to have a say what goes into it then they should get off their butts and write something for it ;) I am sure that the writers will be at responsible enough (and if not we can yank their privlidges to

Re: Jakarta Newsletter - May 2002

+1 At 03:04 AM 6/6/2002 +0100, you wrote: >"Rob Oxspring" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Jakarta Newsletter > > == > > Issue: 0 > > Date: May 2002 > >Anyone against sending this to announcements? > >I'm +1 on content (and since my flamewar occupies about 30% of it, well!!! >:):)

Re: Jakarta Newsletter - May 2002

"Rob Oxspring" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jakarta Newsletter > == > Issue: 0 > Date: May 2002 Anyone against sending this to announcements? I'm +1 on content (and since my flamewar occupies about 30% of it, well!!! :):):) Pier -- [Perl] combines all the worst aspects of

RE: Jakarta Newsletter - May 2002

ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 5 June 2002 23:45 > To: Jakarta General List > Subject: Re: Jakarta Newsletter - May 2002 > > > Rob, > > Very nice. I've been keeping this idea high on my to-do list > and I'm glad to see you finally get to it. > > Th

Re: Jakarta Newsletter - May 2002

Rob, Very nice. I've been keeping this idea high on my to-do list and I'm glad to see you finally get to it. This is more detailed than future ones probably should be, and that would likely be the case when other projects get incorporated anyway. Great job, and you can count on me assisting yo

Re: Jakarta Newsletter - May 2002

- Original Message - From: "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jakarta General List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 4:19 PM Subject: Re: Jakarta Newsletter - May 2002 > "Rob Oxspring" <[E

Re: Jakarta Newsletter - May 2002

On Wednesday, June 5, 2002, at 04:31 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Rob Oxspring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> So is it worth bothering with each month? Feedback wanted! :) > > Great job! +1 thanks for persevering! > I second Pier's suggestion to peer-review here and send t

Re: Jakarta Newsletter - May 2002

On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Rob Oxspring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So is it worth bothering with each month? Feedback wanted! :) Great job! I second Pier's suggestion to peer-review here and send the newsletter to announce after that. Stefan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Jakarta Newsletter - May 2002

"Rob Oxspring" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jakarta Newsletter > == > Issue: 0 > Date: May 2002 Great job... I'd like to propose the following: peer review on this mailing list, vote request, and then send it off on announcements... This can be done every month if Rob is willing

RE: Jakarta Newsletter - May 2002

>Hopefully this will lead to a dynamic monthly newsletter that >can be sent >out on the announcement list (or a new newsletter one) and try to keep >people informed of what all the projects are up to without >having to monitor >all the projects Excellent works, thanks -- To unsubscribe, e-mail

RE: Jakarta Newsletter - May 2002

Newsletter - May 2002 > So is it worth bothering with each month? Feedback wanted! :) yeah. I enjoyed it ;) > 1) Should we have an archive on the web site (xdoc copy attached as my +1) of course, though the easiest way to archive is to link to the mail archive. > 2) Which list should i

Re: Jakarta Newsletter - May 2002

> So is it worth bothering with each month? Feedback wanted! :) yeah. I enjoyed it ;) > 1) Should we have an archive on the web site (xdoc copy attached as my +1) of course, though the easiest way to archive is to link to the mail archive. > 2) Which list should it post to? - its aimed at peop

Re: Jakarta Newsletter - May 2002

Well, there it is. It took me much longer than I expected, although that's partly due to the jubilee holiday festivities, but finally I came up with something. The contents are limited to general / ant / commons because they're the only dev lists I follow, and the items were chosen on an arbitra