Re: PMC Chair elelection

On Sun, 17 Mar 2002, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> So Sam, if you are willing, a simple set of +1 votes from the PMC >> should be sufficient. > > Sure. So here is my +1 as well. Stefan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

RE: PMC Chair elelection

> So Sam, if you are willing, a simple set of +1 votes from the PMC should be >sufficient. Sure. - Sam Ruby -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

RE: PMC Chair elelection

Pete, > From: Peter Donald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, 14 March 2002 7:56 PM > To: Jakarta General List > Subject: Re: PMC Chair elelection > > > +1 to Sam being chair regardless of whether he wants to or not ;) > > Nothing but good has come out of

Re: PMC Chair elelection

On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Peter Donald wrote: > +1 to Sam being chair regardless of whether he wants to or not ;) +1 - if he doesn't want it, he'll be even better for the job :-) Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: PMC Chair elelection

On 3/14/02 3:55 AM, "Peter Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 to Sam being chair regardless of whether he wants to or not ;) +1 I also will state that I am willing to act as chair, as I wouldn't ask Sam to do something that I wouldn't also do myself. However, I would greatly prefer if Sam

Re: PMC Chair elelection

"Peter Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 to Sam being chair regardless of whether he wants to or not ;) I second this nomination... Sam's great at handling crap jobs :) :) :) (Ok, ok... He's also great on great stuff... But that's not the point!) Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: PMC Chair elelection

+1 to Sam being chair regardless of whether he wants to or not ;) Nothing but good has come out of it so far so why mess with a good thing? On Thu, 14 Mar 2002 11:57, Conor MacNeill wrote: > The first order of business for the new PMC is the election of a Chair. > > Would all PMC members indicat