So quick question. If I don't like the documentation quality of say
oh..this project: http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/index.html --
should I start my own project to compete with it and then create FUD
messages saying how much it sucks while I tout my project as more mature
even if
The 'Source Code' link leads to a page that is butt ugly. The javadoc page is also
yeachh
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Work: http://www.multitask.com.au
Developers: http://adslgateway.multitask.com.au/developers
Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
05/01/02 11:58 PM
Please
You mean it doesn't suck on Mozilla in your browser? The fonts are tiny
and squished beyond readability in mine, is that clearer for you?
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Work: http://www.multitask.com.au
Developers: http://adslgateway.multitask.com.au/developers
Andrew C. Oliver
[snip]
I think both projects have nice advantages and features. Maven has good
documentation. Centipede is easier to setup and is a bit more advanced
in the way it generates documentation. Its a bit alpha but I think the
I've had the opposite experience. The whole reason I got involved
