> So quick question. If I don't like the documentation quality of say > oh......this project: http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/index.html -- > should I start my own project to compete with it and then create FUD > messages saying how much it sucks while I tout my project as more mature > even if its not quite kicked off yet? (at least everyone I've talked to You can do what you like, I'm not holding you back. If you're inferring this is what I did, you're living on another planet.
> says they haven't quite gotten maven working yet -- haven't tried it > myself...centipede suits my needs so no real motivation) Ditto in reverse. > Or would you rather me contribute patches to the documentation of the > project. Quoting you to me on 2002-03-22 on this list: "Your message to me suggests that you think I care whether you use centipede or not. You are mistaken. It works for me. If it works for you, cool. If not, use whatever. Be free. " [snip] > > Marketing campaign? It's just the developer community being excited and > > sharing with their friends. > > > Well tone it down to information instead of FUD+ and maybe I'll even do > more than admire the documentation. (nice work on the doco btw -- its a > quality I like a lot). FUD? Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt about Centipede....I don't see how. Jon posted the Quick! message. There are things I like about Centipede, too, e.g. the cents, and I think there could be a lot of synergy between maven and centipede, e.g. the skins side of things is something I'd like to see with maven, but looking @ POI's site under Linux, the stylesheets need some work :) -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Work: http://www.multitask.com.au Developers: http://adslgateway.multitask.com.au/developers -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
