You can use Nutch - nutch.org will take you to its home.
Otis
--- Edward Quick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to use Lucene with Heritrix in order to create a web
> search
> engine? I read on the Lucene FAQ that opensource crawlers such as
> Heritrix
> are available, and g
lucene4c is a baby still. You should ask about CLucene on the CLucene
list. Somebody just asked about that... maybe it was you :)
CLucene folks still seem to want to join Lucene at Apache.
Otis
--- John Paige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have looked at Lucene4C, it looks to me that it is in
For indexing FTP and HTTP servers, see Nutch (sub-project of Lucene).
For indexing a DB you can write some custom JDBC to pull your data from
DB and index it with Lucene. I imagine a few other people will email
suggestions ;)
Otis
--- Bassem Elsayed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How can I
The problem is that you name a lot of NAMEFILEs that start with "ef".
"A lot" means "more than 1024":
http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/api/org/apache/lucene/search/BooleanQuery.html#getMaxClauseCount()
You could change it with this:
http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/api/org/apache/lucene/searc
Hi Namrata,
Yes, you would need to parse the XML.
Here is one way to do it:
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-lucene/
Otis
--- Namrata Kumari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> I am a beginner to lucene , So kindly excuse me if the questions
> mentioned a
> bit na
If you need to index XML with Lucene, you can look at my article about
using Digester+Lucene to parse+index XML documents. The article can be
found on the IBM developerWorks site.
You can also look at the code that comes with Lucene in Action where we
show how to parse with Digester and SAX 2.0 AP
If you have the Lucene book, look at Chapter 2 (page 59 under section
2.9 (Concurrency, thread-safety, and locking issues) in chapter 2
(Indexing)):
http://www.lucenebook.com/search?query=concurrency+rules
Also, look at Lucene's Bugzilla, where you'll find a contribution that
helps with concurr
Gaston,
You need to have just that 1 Lucene Jar file, and make sure that that
Jar file is in your CLASSPATH. If you need help understanding how
CLASSPATH works, please see
http://www.google.com/search?q=classpath%20tutorial .
Otis
--- Gasi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> f
error that this directives cannot be found on my
> >> webspace:
> >> "org.apache.lucene.analysis.*, org.apache.lucene.document.*,
> >> org.apache.lucene.index.*, org.apache.lucene.search.*,
> >> org.apache.lucene.queryParser.*, org.apache.lucene.demo.*,
>
ts where results have to
> exits,
> because the index is proper uploaded. I think that it is a very small
>
> mistakebut I cannot find it.GreetingsGaston
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Otis Gospodnetic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent
Hi Fredrik,
Are you looking for org.apache.lucene.search.DefaultSimilarity ?
Otis
--- Fredrik Andersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi folks.
>
> I read a transcript from last months digest of this list, in a post
> by
> Rajesh Munavalli, that Lucene uses a VSM retrieval method. In my
> prev
You should email [EMAIL PROTECTED] list, where Nutch users "hang
out".
Otis
--- Christian Aschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after three days of crwling the intranet, the nutch crawler throwed
> an exception :-(
>
> It seems that the crawler wants to do something with the .DS_stor
All you really need is:
http://apache.oc1.mirrors.redwire.net/jakarta/lucene/binaries/lucene-1.4.3.jar
Otis
--- Arpit Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have installed tomcat on XP but when I go to page
> http://apache.oc1.mirrors.redwire.net/jakarta/lucene/binaries/
>
>
> it shows lot's of
That's a log4j warning message, because one of the PDFBox classes is
trying to log something, and you don't have log4j configured
appropriately. This is not a Lucene issue, and it's a warning, so you
can ignore it if you want.
Otis
--- tirupathi reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
I don't think there is. I assume you are considering using Nutch. If
so, use nutch-user mailing list instead. You'll get more help there.
Otis
--- Edward Quick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to crawl a site that is protected. Is there currently any way
> to do
> this with nutch
Hello Arpit,
I suggest you take a look at Lucene in Action. Chapter 1 is free and
downloadable, and contains an explanation of what Lucene is and what it
is not. It also has some code to get you started and give you an idea
about how Lucene can be used.
Otis
--- Arpit Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
One of the Jakarta Commons ones - jakarta.apache.org/commons/codec/
Otis
--- Tricia Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Which library can Base64 be found in?
>
> Thanks,
> Tricia
>
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
>
> > You can encode (e.g. base64) the binary data to get a Stri
I haven't followed the whole thread, but this looks weird:
reader = reader.open(dir);
if (reader != null) {
reader.open(index_path);
reader.open called twice? Why?
Also, you'll get more help on [EMAIL PROTECTED] list.
Otis
- Original Message
From: "Kodumuri, Madhav
Ask on the nutch-user list, and I bet you'll quickly get your answer. My guess
is yes, but Nutch developers purposely kept things simple. Also, Wildcard and
a large-scale search engine/index may not go too well together for performance
reasons.
Otis
- Original Message
From: Raghaven
I have never used Lucene under Windows, but I do know that some quite high
profile Internet companies have used Lucene.net port and are happy with it.
See http://xanga.com
Otis
- Original Message
From: George Carrette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: general@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, Ma
> now
> are general Lucene issues (such as scaling a large index and reducing
> indexing times) rather than C# vs. Java issues. I highly recommend it.
>
> Monsur
> Xanga.com
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:[EMAIL PR
Actually, look at the Lucene group on Simpy - http://www.simpy.com/group/363 -
there is an application or two there that deal with image searching and use
Lucene, if I recall correctly.
Otis
- Original Message
From: Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: general@lucene.apache.org
Sent: M
Hi Mahmoud,
That's great! You should email the Lucene.net list, though.
Any chance you'll port this to Java? Over at Lucene java, we'd love to have an
Arabic analyzer.
By the way, how does your analyzer compare to AraMorph in terms of precission
and recall?
Otis
- Original Message
It sounds like the 11th node would have to have a large disk with all indices.
Or perhaps you'd keep copies of all your indices elsewhere, and would pull the
right one in when you see which node you need to replace.
Otis
- Original Message
From: Slava Imeshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: g
That's distributed indexed, built on top of Sun Grid. The project won a $50K
prize.
- Original Message
From: Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: general@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 10:19:00 AM
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [PROPOSAL] index server project]
I am not su
Damn Y! mail shortcut.
The link to the project is in my Lucene group: http://www.simpy.com/group/363
Otis
- Original Message
From: Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: general@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 10:19:00 AM
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [PROPOSAL] index server
Hi Ben,
I can't volunteer, but you may want to check with Garrett Rooney. He stopped
work on lucene4c, so he may be interested in helping you with moving CLucene
under Apache Lucene.
Otis
- Original Message
From: Ben van Klinken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: general@lucene.apache.org
Sent:
Deepa,
You probably want to ask on [EMAIL PROTECTED] list.
Lucene reads in the whole .tii index file (see the Lucene for explanations of
various Lucene index files).
It doesn't read in *all* the index files, as those could be quite big.
You *can* read in your index in a RAMDirectory via FSDirecto
+1
Otis
- Original Message
From: Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: general@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 5:35:02 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Sponsor the Tika proposal
Hi,
I'd like to call a vote on the Lucene PMC to sponsor the Tika proposal
[1] in the Apache Incubator. Th
Hi Marco,
Lucenebook.com is taking a break, siesta, so if you need to get a copy of
Lucene in Action, you can get it from http://www.manning.com/hatcher2/ or from
http://amazon.com . If you just want to grab the code, you can get that via
http://www.manning.com/hatcher2/ as well.
Otis
. . .
Wolfgang is right, but you can also enable the leading wildcard in the
QueryParser, I believe, plus you can index reversed tokens and stick to the
trailing wildcards.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: Wolfgang Täger <[EMAIL PROTE
Bok Marko,
Very interested. I suggest you continue the discussion on [EMAIL PROTECTED],
though (CC-ing)
You should note that there are several efforts around distributed Lucene.
There is SOLR-303 for distributed search, and there is some work in progress in
Hadoop land around distributed ind
Hi Yannis,
I don't think there is anything of that sort in Lucene, but this shouldn't be
hard to do with a process outside Lucene. Of course. optimizing an index
increases its size temporarily, so your external process would have to take
that into account and play it safe. You could also set
Marko,
You are not getting any responses here because this general@ list is pretty
empty.
Please email java-user list. I mentioned this in my previous reply, but for
some reason you didn't go for it.
Please see http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/HowToContribute
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sema
Hello,
Wildard queries are inefficient in general. But it sounds like you simply want
to combine them into a BooleanQuery where each clause is a SHOULD clause.
A better place to ask is java-user list.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message --
It doesn't. But do some searching, I know somebody did contribute blind
reference feedback implementation to Lucene. The reference to that
contribution must be out there somewhere.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: DanaWhite
Try using 8-9 indexing threads, all of which share the same IndexWriter
instance. It would be great if you could report some observations or numbers.
A better place to ask questions like this is on [EMAIL PROTECTED] (more people).
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nut
Hi,
They are not valid and my guess is that if you feed them to QueryParser you'll
get an exception.
A better place to ask questions about Lucene Java is on java-user list.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Manish Singh <[EMA
Hi,
Use java-user list, there are more people on it.
You need to change the setting in IndexWriter that tells Lucene how many tokens
froma a document to index. By default it indexes only 10,000. I can't
remember the parameter name, but look at the IndexWriter javadocs, it's right
there.
Oti
1. sounds like the right choice to me. On the topic of committing early, would
committing it and allowing people to svn up/co, build locally, and implement
the missing pieces not get us faster to the point of being able to release it?
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr -
Hi,
You may want to ask on the java-user list (more subscribers), which I'm CC-ing,
so we can continue discussion there.
I think you will have to implement your own logic that runs on A and does
something like this:
- stop adding new docs
- call commit on the IndexWriter
- copy the index
- res
Yes, but only if all your fields are stored (and not just indexed).
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Gaurav Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: general@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 6:34:14 AM
> Subject: U
Zoki,
A better list to ask this on is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In short, you can really go either way. Some people feel more comfortable
storing everything in DB as they trust it more (RDBMS's have been around longer
than Lucene has), know how to back it up, need data integrity (FKs), etc.
Storing
+1 and I look forward to seeing Tika closer to Lucene.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: general@lucene.apache.org
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 8:17:47 PM
> S
I saw a pile of responses for this thread, but didn't read them all carefully.
How much exactly will you be paying for a GSA that is licensed to handle 8M
docs? I *believe* you'll be paying around $250,000. Now ask yourself if you
can hire somebody to develop exactly what you want for less.
Logan,
My guess is you'll get more help if you post your question to the Lucene.Net
mailing list (and whose address I don't recall off the top of my head).
Otis --
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: chaiguy1337
> To: general@lucene.
Marc,
I don't have a direct answer to your question, but I'd like to point out
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/SpatialSearch . It is still very bare, but
this Spatial Contrib is about to get a good amount of attention.
If you have more questions, I suggest you use java-user list instead of
Welcome!
Do we need a new PyLucene tab now?
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Andi Vajda
> To: general@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, January 8, 2009 10:51:51 PM
> Subject: Re: Welcome PyLucene
>
>
> On Thu, 8 Jan 200
And now we are almost running out of space for those Lucene subproject tabs! :)
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Michael McCandless
> To: general@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2009 6:20:45 AM
> Subject: Re:
+1
Otis
- Original Message
> From: Grant Ingersoll
> To: general@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 1:04:05 PM
> Subject: Allow committers from any subproject to edit TLP site
>
> What do people think of allowing any subproject committer the right to edit
> the
>
Not sure if this was mentioned before, but hm, I was going to point out
http://index.isc.org/ (see
http://ioiblog.wordpress.com/2008/11/07/kicking-off-the-ioi-blog/ ), but the
server doesn't seem to be listening aha, here:
http://ioiblog.wordpress.com/2009/02/
Perhaps we can get data
Chris,
I don't have the issue number here, but look in Lucene's JIRA and search for...
ah, here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1166
And for Chinese:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1629
If you happen to be using Solr:
http://www.sematext.com/product-multil
I agree! A a matter of fact, that is exactly what I just wrote here:
http://www.jroller.com/otis/entry/followup_open_relevance_project#comment-1242703187000
"For example, couldn't a vendor use it to compare old implementation to
new implementation and provide some kind of metric showing impr
Been thinking about ORP on and off all day today... and Mark brought up the
benchmark contrib. Shouldn't we publish Lucene results for that somewhere on
the site?
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
Yes. I remember having a very hard time showing that RAMDirectory is faster
than FSDirectory back in 2004 while writing Lucene in Action No. 1. If you run
the unit test that's supposed to show it, I think you'll see this.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
--
+1
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Grant Ingersoll
> To: general@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 7:26:35 AM
> Subject: [VOTE] Make the Open Relevance Project (ORP) and official Lucene
> subproject
>
> I'
Hello,
2. How about going with -user immediately, so that when we do add -user and
-dev we don't have to migrate people?
3. Can Confluence send emails with page changes that look like diffs? I'm
asking because MoinMoin does that and I find it very helpful. Mahout's
Confluence doesn't do that
Excellent, thanks for figuring this out. That link to diffs either wasn't
there before or I never noticed it until now. But that works for me!
Otis
- Original Message
> From: Grant Ingersoll
> To: general@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2009 11:06:42 AM
> Subject: [ORP]
Hi Kelly,
I think you want to look at LocalLucene (or LocalSolr). I haven't played with
Local*, so I can't provide more than this tip. Actually, I can also suggest to
dump Plucene - it's a dead project, and even when it was alive it was quite
slow. If you really need to be able to search fr
Hi Brett,
Try creating a simple MS Word document with just a single character in it.
Save it as .doc and check the size. Export to PDF and check the size. I don't
know exactly how big those docs will be, but I bet they'll be many, many times
larger than that one byte character. Open up you
And 2 brand new mailing lists you can subscribe to:
openrelevance-user-subscr...@lucene.apache.org
openrelevance-dev-subscr...@lucene.apache.org
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Grant Ingersoll
> To: general@lucene.apache
+1
Otis
--
Sematext is hiring -- http://sematext.com/about/jobs.html?mls
Lucene, Solr, Nutch, Katta, Hadoop, HBase, UIMA, NLP, NER, IR
- Original Message
> From: George Aroush
> To: general@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Thu, October 8, 2009 6:04:09 PM
> Subject: [VOTE] Graduate Lucene.Ne
George & Co. (Doug & DIGY the mystery man)
I see Lucene.net has its new ML archived under
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-lucene-net-dev|user -- good
What's the timeline for moving the site, getting the Wiki, and moving the svn
repo? Is there an INFRA ticket for that?
May want
Hello,
If "Search Engine Integration, Deployment and Scaling in the Cloud" sounds
interesting to you, and you are going to be in or near New York next Wednesday
(Jan 20) evening:
http://www.meetup.com/NYC-Search-and-Discovery/calendar/12238220/
Sorry for dupes to those of you subscribed to mul
+1
this is software. let's try it. if it doesn't work out, we know what to do.
Otis
- Original Message
> From: Yonik Seeley
> To: general@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, March 3, 2010 5:42:38 PM
> Subject: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development
>
> Many Lucene/Solr committers think t
- Original Message
> From: Andi Vajda
> To: general@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Thu, March 4, 2010 2:13:22 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development
>
>
> On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Mark Miller wrote:
>
> > Who knows - this isn't the official count - just a gauge of what has
> >
Out of curiosity. Please reply ONLY if your are a Solr committer and the
answer to any of the questions is Yes.
1) Are you on solr-dev, but NOT on java-dev?
2) Are you active on solr-dev, but do NOT ACTIVELY FOLLOW java-dev?
3) Are you active on solr-dev, but do NOT ACTIVELY PARTICIPATE on
- Original Message
> From: Uwe Schindler
> To: general@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Thu, March 4, 2010 11:19:47 AM
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development
>
> If we vote on what Mike says, I revise my vote and simply vote +/-0 to not
> stop
> progress. I have some problem wit
- Original Message
> From: Bill Au
> To: general@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, March 3, 2010 11:29:33 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development
>
> In the case where changes are in Lucene only I think it is OK to increment
> the Solr release number since even though the So
Hello,
(just using Yonik's email to reply, but my comments are more general)
- Original Message
> From: Yonik Seeley
> To: general@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Tue, March 9, 2010 10:04:20 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3)
>
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 9:48 AM,
What do people think about doing what I wrote above as step 1 in this whole
process? When that is done in N months, we can see if we can improve on it?
This would also fit "progress, not perfection" mantra.
Otis
- Original Message ----
> From: Otis Gospodnetic
> To: gene
Would it be correct to say that in order to have a voting be perfectly clear,
the VOTE thread should have just the votes and no comments/discussion?
Otis
- Original Message
> From: Grant Ingersoll
> To: general@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Fri, March 12, 2010 11:02:34 AM
> Subject: Re: [
Hi,
Would it be correct to say that a subset of Lucene/Solr committers discussed
the proposal "internally/offline" (i.e. not on MLs) before proposing it?
Thanks,
Otis
Hello,
- Original Message
> From: Grant Ingersoll
> To: general@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Fri, March 12, 2010 11:21:57 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3)
>
>
On Mar 12, 2010, at 11:07 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
>
> Here's what I didn't like. The
Hello,
- Original Message
> From: Grant Ingersoll
> To: general@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Fri, March 12, 2010 12:03:07 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3)
>
>
On Mar 12, 2010, at 11:54 AM, patrick o'leary wrote:
>>> Go
> look at the votes.
>
> Which ones
Hi,
But remember the early days of this (or these) vote threads. I recall some
people saying things like "I won't vote -1 since I don't want to veto the
proposal, so I'll vote +|-0". I recall Doug being one of those people. I
don't think we heard back from Doug in subsequent vote threads. I
Hi,
Consider this just an email to clarify things for Otis (and maybe a few other
people).
Are the following the main goals of the recent merge voting thread(s)?
* Make it easier for Solr to ride the Lucene trunk
* Make it easier for people to avoid committing new features to Solr when they
rea
Hi,
- Original Message
> From: Grant Ingersoll
> To: general@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Tue, March 9, 2010 5:00:42 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3)
>
>
On Mar 9, 2010, at 12:38 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
>
>
>
> * I
Hi,
Hey Grant, I'm not picking on you, I swear! :)
- Original Message
> From: Grant Ingersoll
> To: general@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, March 10, 2010 6:56:57 AM
> Subject: Re: Poll: solr-dev/java-dev overlap
>
>
On Mar 4, 2010, at 3:52 PM, Otis Gospo
Hello,
- Original Message
> From: Grant Ingersoll
> To: general@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Sun, March 14, 2010 12:40:51 PM
> Subject: Re: Less drastic ways
>
>
On Mar 14, 2010, at 12:28 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Consider this just an em
Hi,
- Original Message
> From: Yonik Seeley
> To: general@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Sun, March 14, 2010 3:48:10 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3)
>
> On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Otis Gospodnetic
<
> ymailto="mail
I don't get it, Mike. :)
Even if we merge Lucene/Solr and we treat Solr as just another Lucene
contrib/module, say, contributors who care only about Solr will still patch
against Solr and Lucene developers or those people who have the itch for that
functionality being in Lucene, too, will still
I wish we could somehow lose that "Lucene-Java". The -Java part seems so
forced, like we couldn't come up with anything better.
Otis
- Original Message
> From: Chris Hostetter
> To: "general@lucene.apache.org"
> Sent: Tue, March 23, 2010 2:43:36 PM
> Subject: RE: Branding Solr+Lucen
Jean-Michael,
java-u...@lucene is a better place to ask.
I'd do this:
* back up your index
* use CheckIndex tool (if it existed in your version of Lucene?)
Maybe Luke version you are using has a mismatching Lucene version?
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Hado
What you lose by aggregating all real fields into 1 field is the ability to
give fields different scoring weights.
Is a match in the post title equally important as a match in the body or in one
of the comments?
If yes, then aggregate.
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene
Personally, I would be *very* interested whether moving Lucene.NET to GitHub
will make a difference in terms of progress and style of development. Maybe
forking, pull requests, and the whole "social" thing makes it easier for people
to participate. Since Lucene.NET has struggled for years at A
Vikas, look at DefaultSimilarity.
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
> From: vikas kumar
> To: general@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Thu, December 16, 2010 6:53:24 AM
> Subject: TF & I
Hi,
I think you'll get more help if you ask Drupal community. That error message
is
specific to Drupal.
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
> From: nitishgarg
> To: general@luce
Jotta,
You may want to ask on solr-user list in the future.
If you are asking whether Solr can tell you what was the last document that
Solr
returned to the last query it executed, the answer is no.
Maybe you can describe what you are trying to accomplish, so we can help you.
Email solr-user
I believe AND will be faster, at least in cases when one of the earlier clauses
doesn't actually match any docs, in which case the whole query should terminate
early and not evaluate the remaining clauses.
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem searc
Hi,
Are you using raw Lucene or Solr? If Solr, your query is probably cached in
the
query results cache (see your solrconfig.xml).
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
> From: Yan
Hello,
I'm guessing both Lucene and a DB (relational or not) may be about the same
here. Query like name="John" and age=30 and city="London" could be done with
either, but if you think you'll need to expand those queries to include
full-text search, then I'd go with Lucene (or Solr).
Otis
---
Hi,
Yes, penc?l should do it.
Otis
---
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
> From: boraldo
> To: general@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Mon, May 30, 2011 8:08:54 AM
> Subject: Lucene: is it possi
Hi,
A few things:
1) why not send this to the Solr list?
2) you talk about searching, but the code sample is about optimizing the index.
3) I don't have SolrJ API in front of me, but isn't there is CommonsSolrServe
ctor that takes in a URL instead of HttpClient instance? Try that one.
Otis
---
Ram,
What is x in your case and how much data needs to be replicated each time,
roughly?
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
>
>From: bramsreddy
>To: general@lucene.apache.org
Alan, if you have Lucene in Action 2, there is a case study that describes how
Krugle did this.
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
>
>From: Alan Williamson (aw2.0 cloud experts)
Alex,
You could try compressing the content field - that might help a bit.
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
>
>From: Alex Shneyderman
>To: general@lucene.apache.org
>Sent: T
Hi,
It's hard to tell. For example, the problem could "simply" be with the JVM and
how it is tuned or not tuned, not at all a Solr problem. Or it could be a Solr
problem.
Try using SPM (link below, it's free) - this will help you figure out what is
going on and see what effect any changes yo
Hi,
Is there a writeup that describes how this compares to NRT support in
development version of Solr?
Otis
Performance Monitoring SaaS for Solr -
http://sematext.com/spm/solr-performance-monitoring/index.html
>
> From: Nagendra Nagarajayya
>To: genera
Hi Tiffany,
Apache Lucene is free. There is no corporation behind it. It is released
under Apache Software License by the Apache Software Foundation.
Otis
Performance Monitoring for Solr / ElasticSearch / HBase -
http://sematext.com/spm
>
> From: Tiff
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
