Ooops! My bad since I meant to nominate someone and then got caught up
in too much other work lately.
+1 to running the vote on commons-dev@xml, since that is the mailing
list that the commons community should be living on.
+1 to announcing the vote on general@xml, since technically according
to
On Tuesday, February 4, 2003, at 05:58 AM, David Crossley wrote:
There is very little help from the other xml projects on
xml-commons. It seems to completely slip people's minds
that they are also by default, committers on xml-commons.
The project is languishing, yet it has very important
compo
committers are also commons committers, do we hold the election for commons
in general@ or commons-dev@?
Ted
- Original Message -
From: "David Crossley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 9:58 PM
Subject: Re: xml.apache.org refacto
Ted Leung wrote:
> As you are no doubt aware, the ASF board has approved two
> new PMC's: one for Web Services (to include Axis, SOAP, XML-RPC,
> and XML-Security), and one for Cocoon.
>
> In keeping with the proposal that I made last week, I'd like
> each of the remaining subprojects to elect 1 o
12:55
PM
Subject: xml.apache.org refactoring #1 -
expansion of PMC
As you are no doubt aware, the ASF board has
approved two new PMC's: one for Web Services (to include Axis, SOAP, XML-RPC,
and XML-Security), and one for Cocoon.
In keeping with the proposal that I made la
PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 11:12
AM
Subject: xml.apache.org refactoring
#1
Gre
I'm not subscribed any more, and it didn't bounce. Feel free to forward
it.
Ted
- Original Message -
From: "Christian Geisert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 5:26 AM
Subject: Re: xml.apache.org refactoring #1
Ted Leung wrote:
Greetings all,
Seems like this mail didn't make it to fop-dev yet ...
(Are you subscribed Ted?)
Christian
-
In case of troubles, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Ted Leung wrote:
> We ask each subproject to nominate 1 (or 2) people from that project to
> be a part of the XML PMC. From my experience, I think that it will be
> better to have 2 people rather than one in order to share workload, etc.
Another task we need nominees for (
Ted Leung wrote:
Greetings all,
From our discussion last December, it seems clear to me that most of
the subprojects are not interested in becoming top-level projects. It
also seems clear that people are interested broad based representation
in the XML PMC. I think that the best way to i
Greetings all,
From our discussion last December, it seems clear
to me that most of the subprojects are not interested in becoming top-level
projects. It also seems clear that people are interested broad based
representation in the XML PMC. I think that the best way to improve
the issue
11 matches
Mail list logo
