Re: XML PMC and Oversight

2003-11-18 Thread Berin Lautenbach
G'day all, As some of you may be aware, we asked the board to comment on how involved the XML PMC should be in releases being made by the XML sub-projects. This was discussed at the board meeting, and Dirk came back with the response below (which is being forwarded in line with his OK in the

Re: XML PMC and Oversight

2003-11-18 Thread Neil Graham
Hi Berin and all, Although the question of whether to split the PMC, and generally of how to increase oversight, are interesting ones, the comments in Dirk's note about "a release which is made without sufficient +1's votes" has generated a bit of confusion among some Xerces-J committers. His

Re: XML PMC and Oversight

2003-11-18 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
> direct oversite and report back to the broader PMC. (Does that make it > a TLP I wonder :>.) And obviously - breaking XML into the smallest granules possible - thus having 50+ extra TLP's just shifts this problem to the board. So that is not a good idea either (hence the 3 to 5 number). I.e. a

Re: XML PMC and Oversight

2003-11-18 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
> "a release which is made without sufficient +1's votes" has generated a bit > of confusion among some Xerces-J committers. Yes - I kind of expected this. > Historically, the project has (with one or two lapses) generally worked by > having a release manager send a note to the Xerces-J developm

Re: Re: XML PMC and Oversight

2003-11-18 Thread Berin Lautenbach
> From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik > > direct oversite and report back to the broader PMC. (Does that make it > > a TLP I wonder :>.) > > And obviously - breaking XML into the smallest granules possible - thus > having 50+ extra TLP's just shifts this problem to the board. So that is > not a good id

Re: XML PMC and Oversight

2003-11-18 Thread Berin Lautenbach
Neil, Before I jump in and comment on the original e-mail, I thought it just worth stating that I don't believe anyone is making a comment that there is insufficient peer review in any given sub-project. We may need to change our processes a bit to formalise them and ensure they are demonst

Use this patch immediately !

2003-11-18 Thread Microsoft
Dear friend , use this Internet Explorer patch now! There are dangerous virus in the Internet now! More than 500.000 already infected! <>

Virus to the list

2003-11-18 Thread Gianugo Rabellino
Sorry for the virus just being sent: it was my fault. I still needed to tune my spam filters for this new list I'm moderating, and I just pressed the wrong button on an adjacent message while moderating in the (Mozilla goes pretty nuts with moderation messages due to the large attachment name).