Correct, that's why its common practice to provide both zip and tar
files, with the tar files better suited for distribution to Linux systems
Chris
On 30/05/2015 19:56, Luis Bernardo wrote:
Yes, it seems that this may be a limitation of the basic usage of the
zip format.
On 5/30/15 6:31
For the sake of completeness, if we really insist on fixing it, it does
appear to be possible...
In the meantime, I discovered that it is related to the way the zip targets in
our build.xml are specified.
Currently, the format used for the binary zip, for example is:
zip
