Edward,
Sub-projects are generally frowned on. Incubator projects can graduate
eventually to a top-level project, but starting a project as a sub is not
so good. The incubator docs on this are pretty good reading.
But if the committer community for your real-time BSP is (or can be) the
same as
Thanks Ted. I generally agree with your suggestion.
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
Edward,
Sub-projects are generally frowned on. Incubator projects can graduate
eventually to a top-level project, but starting a project as a sub is not
so good.
2014-04-28 10:45 GMT+02:00 Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com:
Edward,
Sub-projects are generally frowned on. Incubator projects can graduate
eventually to a top-level project, but starting a project as a sub is not
so good. The incubator docs on this are pretty good reading.
But if the
I am also agree with suggestions of Ted and Tommas.
Since Meerkat will be developed on top of Hama, it can be managed under
Hama project like hama-graph. In addition, developing Meerkat will not make
Hama changed largely (even not at all), because Hama is generic BSP
framework.
On Mon, Apr 28,
Hi All,
Since entering Incubation in June 2013, the stratos podling has evolved and is
now ready to self-govern. The community has extensively debated graduation
readiness [1] and overwhelmingly voted positively [2]. As far as I can tell the
project status is up to date [3]. The name search
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:28:15AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
The Brooklyn project [1] community is interested in moving to the ASF. They
have worked within their community to create a proposal [2] for the
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Suresh Marru sma...@apache.org wrote:
Hi All,
Since entering Incubation in June 2013, the stratos podling has evolved and
is now ready to self-govern. The community has extensively debated graduation
readiness [1] and overwhelmingly voted positively [2]. As
Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache
Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now.
[ ] +1 Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator
[ ] +/-0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Brooklyn
[ ] -1 Do not accept Brooklyn because...
The proposal can be found
+1 Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator
+1
Greetings, Marcel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Dear General,
The vote has already run for over 10 days but still we are still short by
1 IPMC vote. We have been able to gather only 2 votes till date. I have
already asked a couple of times before but it did not work out. Now I am
not sure how to proceed further. Can some one please help us
Hi Rahul,
Sorry for the impasse. I will review this release and vote accordingly.
Suresh
On Apr 28, 2014, at 10:46 AM, Rahul Sharma rahul0...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear General,
The vote has already run for over 10 days but still we are still short by
1 IPMC vote. We have been able to gather
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org wrote:
Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache
Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now.
[ ] +1 Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator
[ ] +/-0 Indifferent to the acceptance
+1 (binding)
Good luck guys
On Monday, April 28, 2014, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org wrote:
Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache
Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now.
[ ] +1 Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator
[ ] +/-0
+1
-Jake
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.orgwrote:
Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache
Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now.
[ ] +1 Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator
[ ] +/-0 Indifferent to the
+1
-- Andrei Savu
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 6:49 AM, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.orgwrote:
Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache
Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now.
[ ] +1 Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator
[ ] +/-0
After the week's voting, here's the results.
Binding +1s:
Arun C Murthy
Suresh Srinivas
Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
Devaraj Das
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Jakob Homan
Non-binding +1s:
P. Taylor Goetz
larry mccay
On and after April 25:
Binding +1s:
Mahadev Konar
Non-binding +1s:
Dilli Arumugam
+1
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Andrei Savu savu.and...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
-- Andrei Savu
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 6:49 AM, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org
wrote:
Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache
Incubator as a podling, I'd like to
Congrats and welcome to ASF incubator guys!
- Henry
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Steve Loughran ste...@hortonworks.com wrote:
After the week's voting, here's the results.
Binding +1s:
Arun C Murthy
Suresh Srinivas
Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
Devaraj Das
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Jakob
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote:
Congrats and welcome to ASF incubator guys!
Indeed! Best of luck growing your community and project!
Thanks,
Roman.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
+1
+Vote of thanks to everyone who volunteered to become one of our mentors
Best
Duncan
On 28 April 2014 14:49, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org wrote:
Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache
Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now.
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
On Apr 28, 2014, at 6:49 AM, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org wrote:
Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache
Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now.
[ ] +1 Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator
[ ] +/-0
Mine too +1
On 28 April 2014 15:44, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Suresh Marru sma...@apache.org wrote:
Hi All,
Since entering Incubation in June 2013, the stratos podling has evolved and
is now ready to self-govern. The community has
Hi all,
May 2014 Incubator report timeline:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/May2014
Tue May 06 -- Podling reports due by end of day
Sat May 10 -- Shepherd reviews due by end of day
Sat May 10 -- Summary due by end of day
Mon May 12 -- Mentor signoff due by end of day
All,
There was an issue with the clutch report. Please see below for corrected
dates:
May 2014 Incubator report timeline:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/May2014
Wed May 07 -- Podling reports due by end of day
Sun May 11 -- Shepherd reviews due by end of day
Sun May 11 --
+1
On 28 April 2014 23:49, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org wrote:
Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache
Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now.
[ ] +1 Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator
[ ] +/-0 Indifferent to the acceptance of
+1
On Apr 29, 2014 3:43 AM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
+1
On 28 April 2014 23:49, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org wrote:
Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache
Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now.
[ ] +1 Accept
27 matches
Mail list logo
