Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache Dubbo Spring Boot Project (Incubating) 2.7.0

+1. (Binding) I checked, * signatures and sha sign are good * incubating in name * DISCLAIMER exists * LICENSE and NOTICE look good * Can build the source from the kit. * No binary files in the source jars. Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 1:24 PM

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Dubbo OPS (Incubating) 0.1 [RC3]

Sorry, I just got some time to check the release kit. I had to vote -1 for binary release. The LICENSE file of the binary release need to be updated. As there are lots of third-party jars are bunded in the dubbo-admin-0.1.jar. We need to make a list in the LICENSE file to specify those bunded

Permission to print a PLC4X stand for being displayed at conferences?

Hi all, I just wanted to ask, if it is ok that my company produces a rollup display for the Apache PLC4X (incubating) podling and we use that at conferences like the “Building IoT”, where we are sponsor and I’m talking on PLC4X. Here some links to options our designer did.

Re: Permission to print a PLC4X stand for being displayed at conferences?

Hi Chris, On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 6:23 AM Christofer Dutz wrote: > ...I just wanted to ask, if it is ok that my company produces a rollup > display for the Apache PLC4X... Promotion of our projects is great as long as it's clear that they are Apache projects! I think it's best to ask press@

Re: Permission to print a PLC4X stand for being displayed at conferences?

Hi Chris - The Branding advice/requirements you would get does not differ between TLP and Podling other than places where an Incubating disclaimer should exist. Regarding contacting press@apache about any incubator limitations, Sally is pretty quick and my experience is that it is mostly about

Re: Permission to print a PLC4X stand for being displayed at conferences?

Hehe, We were discussing our timeframe for asking to become a tlp ... Perhaps it's easier to start that process ;-) But thanks for your input, I forwarded it to our marketing department. Chris Outlook f?r Android herunterladen From:

Re: Podlings not following ASF release policy

Hello Justin, Could you please tell us about issues with ASF release policy in Marvin? Thanks! Yifei Zhang Em seg, 11 de fev de 2019 às 02:27, Kenneth Knowles escreveu: > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-438 > > :-) > > Kenn > > On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 1:06 PM Justin Mclean >

Re: [DISCUSS] Guidelines for distribution of incubating artefacts on other platforms

> > If you want to add another platform please do so, but these are one we’ve > recently had issues with that I’m aware of. We distribute artefacts through *CocoaPods* and *Gradle* channel in *incubator-weex* project for iOS and Android

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc2

Also, I looked to the TLP Apache Spark for an example on license header on markdown, and I found none [1]. Is your comment on markdown file a suggestion or a requirement? Some clarification would be much appreciated. -sz [1]

Re: [DISCUSS] Guidelines for distribution of incubating artefacts on other platforms

Hi, > We distribute artefacts through *CocoaPods* and *Gradle* channel in > *incubator-weex* project > for iOS and Android developers. It would be great if you could add > *CocoaPods* and *Gradle *platforms. I'm not familiar with those

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache Dubbo Spring Boot Project (Incubating) 2.7.0

Hi, +1 binding. I checked: - incubating in name - DISCLAIMER exits - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - Al source file have ASF headers - No unexpected binary files - Can compile from source P.S.: Netty dependency has removed from the NOTICE, great following. Best Regards, Von Gosling > 在

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Doris 0.9.0-incubating-rc02

+1 (Binding) I checked: * The signature and hashes are ok * DISCLAIMER file * LICENSE and NOTICE files look good * Checked the docker file of the docker image * Can build from source within the docker image Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 8:09 PM 德

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc2

Hi Luciano, Thank you for the helpful feedback. As a PPMC member of Apache MXNet, I'd like to resolve this issue once for all. One thing that we can benefit from your help is narrowing down what file types are acceptable to be in whitelist. I started a pull-request for this purpose [1] (and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc2

Hi Sheng Zha, Check example from Hadoop's documentation. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/hadoop/trunk/hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/src/site/markdown/filesystem/filesystem.md In Hadoop's documentation all markdown files have header and none of them are excluded from RAT check.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc2

Hi Vinay, Thank you for the pointer. I will apply the same header in mxnet markdown files. While I fully intend to uphold incubator MXNet's release to the standard of Apache, I'm curious why some TLPs adopt this while others don't. In this case, is this still a requirement and a basis for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc2

Hi, > While I fully intend to uphold incubator MXNet's release to the standard of > Apache, I'm curious why some TLPs adopt this while others don't. In this > case, is this still a requirement and a basis for stopping a release? Many > people put in hard work to make it happen so I hope to bring

Re: [RESTARTING][VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc2

Hi - Third party vendor considerations do not matter. Are you voting +1 with your Apache hat on or your Amazon hat? Regards, Dave > On Feb 11, 2019, at 10:16 PM, Lin Yuan wrote: > > +1 binding > Horovod is going to release it's 0.16.0 in the coming week with MXNet > integration. We need to

Apache ManifoldCF: Get a history report for a repository connection over REST API

Dear Sir or Madam, I'm trying to get a history report for a repository connection over ManifoldCF REST API. According to the documentation: https://manifoldcf.apache.org/release/release-2.11/en_US/programmatic-operation.html#History+query+parameters It should be possible with the following URL

Re: Apache ManifoldCF: Get a history report for a repository connection over REST API

Redirecting your query to d...@manifoldcf.apache.org Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 12, 2019, at 8:38 AM, Marta Gołąbek wrote: > > Dear Sir or Madam, > > I'm trying to get a history report for a repository connection over > ManifoldCF REST API. According to the documentation: > >

[VOTE] Accept Training into the Apache Incubator

Hi everyone, we've discussed the proposal for the Training project in [1] and [2]. The proposal itself can be found on the wiki[3]. According to the Incubator rules[4] I'd like to call a vote to accept the new "Training" project as a podling in the Apache Incubator. A vote for accepting a new

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Dubbo OPS (Incubating) 0.1 [RC3]

Hi community, Dubbo OPS 0.1 RC3 is still waiting for 3 binding votes to get it passed. Would you please help to review and vote for the candidate? On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 11:01 PM Minxuan Zhuang wrote: > Hello Incubator Community, > > The Apache Dubbo community has voted on and approved a