Thanks, John!
This is very helpful links!
Best,
Josh
> On Sep 16, 2022, at 11:12 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> Hey Josh,
>
> Thanks for the clarification, I found the thread from Craig. For future
> reference, you shouldn't be voting on accepting a CCLA and/or SGA.
> Procedure wise, this
Here's my +1 on the code
There's a few notes:
- I would recommend the podling add some kind of reference to this clause
in their NOTICE file: Copyright 2022 The Applied Research Laboratory for
Intelligence and Security (ARLIS) (see [1])
- There's many files missing any headers. I think it's safe
Hey Josh,
Thanks for the clarification, I found the thread from Craig. For future
reference, you shouldn't be voting on accepting a CCLA and/or SGA.
Procedure wise, this doesn't make sense. You're voting on accepting a code
donation, and it's just that code donations from the foundation's
Hi John,
Thanks for your response.
I had a long thread with Calvin, Justin, and Craig Russell to clarify the
process of onboarding new SW grants into existing podlings RE CCLA. The thread
is on private@incubator, which I'm unable to grab a permalink for through
lists...
Bottom line up front:
Note that you're using public and private lists which is a big no-no.
I'll be honest I don't understand what you're trying to get the IPMC to
vote on. You may need some help from mentors. I saw IP clearance and will
point out that [1] isn't for podlings. Likewise if this CCLA is new after
your
Hello General!
Refreshing this 72 VOTE:
I am looking for additional review and binding VOTEs from the Incubator
regarding a recent SW grant (via CCLA) from UMD to the Flagon Podling. The
Flagon community has VOTED to accept for reasons outlined below and Secretary
has accepted the CCLA. We
Hello Incubator!
I am continuing a 72 VOTE from the Flagon Community on Incubator General
regarding the acceptance of an ICLA and Software Grant into the Apache Flagon
(Incubating) Podling.
The purpose of this VOTE is to establish consensus and transparency wrt to IP
Clearance.
We conducted
