> Apache projects (and podlings) don't have project leads.
Let's say active podling PPMC member(s) instead.
Makoto
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
On 30/11/2018 06:04, Makoto Yui wrote:
> Justin,
>
> I think it's a great idea. Podling project leads know the up-to-date
> ASF incubation process very well.
Apache projects (and podlings) don't have project leads.
> It helps finding active mentors.
>
> As a release manager and PPMC of an
Hi,
> 1. If you are an ASF member and they are automatically in*
If you are an ASF member and ask to join the IPMC I meant to say.
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For
Hi,
There’s two ways to join the IPMC:
1. If you are an ASF member and they are automatically in*
2. The current IPMC can vote on someone into the IPMC*
The issue with 2 is that it hard to recognise people who want to be IPMC
member, so my proposal is more about getting those people more easily
- I think we should explicitly look at the proposal and mentors listed and then
express any concerns.
I am not sure am I missing some important discussion for the qualification of
the IPMC :-) I read some of the reply carefully and very agree with explicitly
list some concerns when we guide
Justin,
I think it's a great idea. Podling project leads know the up-to-date
ASF incubation process very well.
It helps finding active mentors.
As a release manager and PPMC of an incubator project, requiring more
active mentor(s),
I would be glad to give help the following podling projects.
>
Hi,
So with some with some minor modification looks like this is all good. I’ll get
a draft of the changes to go on our web site.
If there’s anyone else who is not a member and think they have the experience
to be an IPMC member please send to request to our private email list.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi
+1, I am chairman of TLP project and has been involved multiple incubating
projects from start to finish, also was responsible for multiple releases as
manager.
I would be glad to give help if some new incubator projects require.
Regards
Liang
Justin Mclean wrote
> Hi,
>
> I looked at
+1 to the new proposals.
The key is to have new potential members to be VOTED in to IPMCs, meaning
someone from existing IPMC should have know the criteria to be invited.
- Henry
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 12:20 AM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I looked at the board resolution for the creation
+1 to both from me too!
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 12:22 PM Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 1:28 AM Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 9:20 AM Justin Mclean
> wrote:
> > > ...I propose this:
> > >
> > > If someone has done several of the
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 1:28 AM Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 9:20 AM Justin Mclean wrote:
> > ...I propose this:
> >
> > If someone has done several of the following:
> > - has been involved in an incubating project from start to finish
> > - has been a release
+1 to elected non-members to the IPMC.
In this way, We could leverage hands from the PPMC member who has some
experience podling process.
>From my experience I learned a lot from the whole podling process even
I mentored serval project before.
Regards,
Willem Jiang
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo:
Hi,
> Yes, and commitment is the key. The IPMC can fix this if we take some
> examples.
>
> (1) We have elected non-members to the IPMC. I was one. We should be more
> active in identifying merit.
This is part of the issue, but I think with a large IPMC and a very large pool
of potential
Hi,
Bertrand recommendation on having at least one ASF mentor or experienced mentor
seems sensible to me.
Dave it is the case that some experienced IPMC mentor dropout. we currently
need more mentors to replace missing ones than we do for new incubating
projects, so initial most of these
Hi -
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 8, 2018, at 3:43 AM, Myrle Krantz wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 7:10 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
>>
>> Hi -
>>
...I propose this:
If someone has done several of the following:
- has been involved in an incubating project from start to
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 7:10 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
> Hi -
>
> >> ...I propose this:
> >>
> >> If someone has done several of the following:
> >> - has been involved in an incubating project from start to finish
> >> - has been a release manager
> >> - has assembled LICENSE and NOTICE files
> >> -
Hi -
>> ...I propose this:
>>
>> If someone has done several of the following:
>> - has been involved in an incubating project from start to finish
>> - has been a release manager
>> - has assembled LICENSE and NOTICE files
>> - has reviewed and voted on releases
>> - has proposed or accepted
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 9:20 AM Justin Mclean wrote:
> ...I propose this:
>
> If someone has done several of the following:
> - has been involved in an incubating project from start to finish
> - has been a release manager
> - has assembled LICENSE and NOTICE files
> - has reviewed and voted
+1.
I get asked to mentor projects too, but have this restriction of not being
able to join the IPMC
On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 at 3:13 PM, Sheng Wu wrote:
> Hi Justin
>
> Very interesting proposal. And I like it, also willing to request for that
> :)
>
> From my experience, several projects have
I agree. This is a policy for the IPMC to determine and I think this will
increase inclusion. We need mentors and of all types. +1
--
Kevin A. McGrail
VP Fundraising, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
On
I like this. I had the (apparently accurate) impression that ASF membership
was the usual route to podling mentorship. I'm very interested in
mentorship generally and ways I can help out ASF - so they might someday
intersect in the formal role of podling mentor. It is nice to see a path
that is
Great ideas, thanks Justin!
Justin Mclean wrote on 11/6/18 3:20 AM:
> Hi,
>
> I looked at the board resolution for the creation of the IPMC [1] and it says
> nothing about how IPMC members should be added so from that I take it that
> the IPMC can decide how it wants to do that.
The IPMC is a
Hi Justin
Very interesting proposal. And I like it, also willing to request for that :)
>From my experience, several projects have invited me or involved me in, such
>as Zipkin(Incubating) and IoTDB(In Incubator discussion). But because I can't
>be podling project mentor, based on Apache
23 matches
Mail list logo
