Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Annotator (incubating) version 0.1.0 (-rc.4)

2020-06-27 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > I'm on both the Incubator PMC and on the Apache Annotator PPMC, but wasn't > sure if I could "double dip" with my vote. All IPMC votes are valid and count. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@inc

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Annotator (incubating) version 0.1.0 (-rc.4)

2020-06-25 Thread Benjamin Young
e.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Annotator (incubating) version 0.1.0 (-rc.4) > On 18 Jun 2020, at 02:41, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >> The build should work on macOS with the requirements listed in the README. >> Node.js and Yarn are the two required tools

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Annotator (incubating) version 0.1.0 (-rc.4)

2020-06-18 Thread Nick Kew
> On 18 Jun 2020, at 02:41, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >> The build should work on macOS with the requirements listed in the README. >> Node.js and Yarn are the two required tools. > > I had both of them installed but is seem to be expected something else, I can > try again if you want

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Annotator (incubating) version 0.1.0 (-rc.4)

2020-06-17 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > The build should work on macOS with the requirements listed in the README. > Node.js and Yarn are the two required tools. I had both of them installed but is seem to be expected something else, I can try again if you want the exact error. Thanks, Justin --

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Annotator (incubating) version 0.1.0 (-rc.4)

2020-06-15 Thread Randall Leeds
On 2020/06/14 01:31:11, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +1 (binding) Thank you, Justin! > - Unable to compile on OSX but assume that’s not a supported platform. It > would be good to mention this in the README. The build should work on macOS with the requirements listed in the README. Node.j

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Annotator (incubating) version 0.1.0 (-rc.4)

2020-06-13 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name - signature and hashes are fine - LICENSE is perhaps missing something e.g. license for [1] - NOTICE is fine - DISCLAIMER exists but please list why you are using the WIP disclaimer - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF headers -