At 12:10 28/2/01 +1100, Peter Donald wrote:
At 07:50 27/2/01 -0500, Sam Ruby wrote:
GNUs stance is never to compromise which means that the only way
for APL to fit in is to remove advertising/name clauses which
is unfortunately where one of Apaches strengths are
I suspect that that clause
Sam Ruby wrote:
[...]
[+1] Peter Donald
[+1] Diane Holt
[+1] Ted Husted
[+1] Ceki Glc
[+1] Geir Magnusson Jr.
[+1] Daniel F. Savarese
[+1] Jason van Zyl
I've seen Ted and Ceki in action on this list, and I'm sure they
will be a great fit for PMC given their involvement with guidelines
someone care to point this guy towards the clue train?
-jon
--
From: naresh makwana [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Friday, February 23, 2001 10:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: regarding the installation problem
SIR,
MY NAME IS NARESH MAKWANA.T HAVE DONE JAVA.
I HAVA DOWNLOADED BINARY
more clue train's needed...
fyi, i removed the attached 1.5 megs of PDF files. if you really think you
need them to answer the question let me know.
-jon
--
From: Raanan Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sunday, February 25, 2001 8:28 AM
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
on 2/27/01 3:03 PM, "Adam Fowler" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You need to specify the amount of memory that tomcat starts with. This has
been explained in the last two days on the tomcat user mailing list
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Have a read and follow the instructions.
Sigh. Thank you for answering
At 09:26 27/2/01 -0500, Sam Ruby wrote:
I suspect that that clause is not the core issue.
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/foundation-list/2000-August/msg00207.html
I suspect intention and reality are different.
You need to read Brian's words carefully. There is an asymmetry here which
may not
on 2/27/01 4:09 PM, "Peter Donald" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It ain't matter what the ASF permits as the GPL does not permit it ;)
Then don't use the GPL.
(round and round and round and round)
-jon
--
If you come from a Perl or PHP background, JSP is a way to take
your pain to new levels.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 11:15 27/2/01 +0100, Alex Fernndez wrote:
Probably you have a stronger case here, but I'd like to know the opinion
of the PMC on the
subject, if they think it's worthwhile. Would you accept dual
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
"Sam Ruby" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
snip
IANAL, nor do I play one on TV. But I have seen quite a few good people
try to resolve what appears on the surface to be a deceptively simply
issue, and fail. Significant attempts have been made, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
"Sam Ruby" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
snip
GNUs stance is never to compromise which means that the only way
for APL to fit in is to remove advertising/name clauses which
is unfortunately where one of Apaches strengths are
I suspect that that
[The bug site is down]
I understand the real problem now and here are new diffs for Bug 728.
The problem was that in trying to minimize the amount of code in the
synchronized blocks a race condition was created. The assignment
and reading of the array values HAS to be part of the synchronized
Lindsay Patten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[The bug site is down]
Whops... Sorry, we were installing the new Disk Array (280 Gigs, slurp :)
and the new Backup Unit...
Pier
--
Pier P. Fumagalli
12 matches
Mail list logo
