At 12:10 28/2/01 +1100, Peter Donald wrote:
>At 07:50 27/2/01 -0500, Sam Ruby wrote:
>>> GNUs stance is never to compromise which means that the only way
>>> for APL to fit in is to remove advertising/name clauses which
>>> is unfortunately where one of Apaches strengths are
>>
>>I suspect that that clause is not the core issue.
>>
>>http://mail.gnome.org/archives/foundation-list/2000-August/msg00207.html
>
>I suspect intention and reality are different. See further on at
>
>http://mail.gnome.org/archives/foundation-list/2000-August/msg00215.html
>
>I doubt any lawyer or GNU person would try to argue that APL is a subset of
>GPL (which is required).
bleh
I doubt any lawyer or GNU person would try to argue that particular clause
of APL (naming clause) is a subset of GPL (which is required).
Cheers,
Pete
*-----------------------------------------------------*
| "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, |
| and proving that there is no need to do so - almost |
| everyone gets busy on the proof." |
| - John Kenneth Galbraith |
*-----------------------------------------------------*
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
