-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 11:15 27/2/01 +0100, Alex Fernández wrote:
> >Probably you have a stronger case here, but I'd like to know the opinion
> of the PMC on the
> >subject, if they think it's worthwhile. Would you accept dual
> (ASL/GPL)-licensed code? Why?
>
> In short it is not the responsibility of the PMC to accept or not accept
> dual licensing. It is a responsibility of the apache members
> foundation-wide (as they are the copyright owners). I suspect that this
> wouldn't occur although I hope that the next version of APL and next
> version of GPL could be interoperable.
<snip>
I already asked Stallman about this issue. He says no. :(.. I can forward
his e-mail ... if I can find it.
Kevin
- --
Kevin A. Burton ( [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
Cell: 408-910-6145 URL: http://relativity.yi.org ICQ: 73488596
Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, and proving that there is
no need to do so - almost everyone gets busy on the proof.
-- John Kenneth Galbraith
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Get my public key at: http://relativity.yi.org/pgpkey.txt
iD8DBQE6nFHpAwM6xb2dfE0RAtr8AKDSa8Bz/l3FFebYWO1quQUIMEqAZgCdHswg
SU4eEdgXRSpruBU8eQVE1Hg=
=P+B2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Uzi cryptographic kibo KGB explosion nuclear smuggle Panama munitions FSF
domestic disruption bomb FBI ammunition Serbian
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
