On Mon, 27 Mar 2006, Henri Yandell wrote:
[ ] +1
[X] -1
If your -1 is only for a particular subproject (ie: you don't care what
the rest of Jakarta does, feel free to say so).
Just -1 for POI, owing to the need for a I haven't seen any Microsoft
specs disclaimer
Nick
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Martin van den Bemt wrote:
The reasoning behind this is that POI is still trying to stick to what
it Jakarta once was and it is time they join the club completely.
I think it was actually a reccomendation from the legal team. We have
always asked that anyone contributing
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Martin van den Bemt wrote:
Apache legal doesn't know anything about this..
Back when I joined POI, I was told the apache legal team had suggested the
requirement.
Perhaps one of the older POI committers can supply the original details?
Nick
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Henri Yandell wrote:
Back when I joined POI, I was told the apache legal team had suggested the
requirement.
Perhaps one of the older POI committers can supply the original details?
My understanding is that the advice is from Andy's personal lawyer many
moons ago, maybe
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, Martin van den Bemt wrote:
If poi committers agree with this proposal, I like to hear them :)
We had a discussion on something like this on the poi-dev list back in the
summer. To save everyone having to trawl back, here's basically what I had
to say.
I it is felt that POI
the scope of responsibility of
the Apache POI Project; and be it further
RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
POI PMC:
* Nick Burch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Amol S. Deshmukh
On Fri, 4 May 2007, Nick Burch wrote:
So, now is the time to vote on the proposal:
And for the record, my vote is +1
Nick
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
of responsibility of
the Apache POI PMC; and be it further
RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
Apache POI PMC:
* Nick Burch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Amol S. Deshmukh [EMAIL
Hi All
The voting has now closed, and the votes are in. We had 23 +1 votes, of
which 15 were from pmc members. Martin will now present the proposal to
the board for their approval.
Nick Burch (pmc)
Andrew Oliver (pmc)
David Fisher
Henri Yandel (pmc)
Avik Sengupta (pmc)
Rainer Klute
N. Hira
On Fri, 11 May 2007, Jörg Schaible wrote:
there were more votes:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.general/9842
Hmm, that's odd. Yours doesn't seem to be showing on
mail-archives.apache.org, which is what I was using. Sorry I missed you
off!
://jakarta.apache.org/poi/
For the Apache Jakarta POI Team
Nick Burch
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi All
For the 3.0 release of POI, we followed the advice on voting on
artificats, the not the state of the tree. So, we used our ant script to
produce RC artificats, signed them, and placed them on people.apache.org
for review.
After the vote, we renamed the files from -RC4- to -FINAL-,
On Mon, 21 May 2007, Henri Yandell wrote:
Don't your jars contain the version number too?
Yeah, everything seems to :/
The most recent release types I've done are the type where you create
the exact release and put it in your ~login where it's voted on. I like
this because it makes the
of HSLF (PowerPoint) updates
* HDGF - basic, read only support for Visio Files
A full changelog is available at:
http://poi.apache.org/changes.html
Apache POI 3.0.1 is downloadable from the apache website
http://poi.apache.org/
For the Apache POI Team
Nick Burch
14 matches
Mail list logo
