I'd rather perform their role from 1987-1999 or so ;-)
-Andy
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
I never had you for an idealest. What I think they'll do is start
trying to sell the JDK, lock every thing down grasping for some business
model...any busines model.then sink slowly into the abyss
Never skip a start of something is my motto ;)
Mvgr,
Martin
On Sat, 2002-10-26 at 13:04, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
I'd rather perform their role from 1987-1999 or so ;-)
-Andy
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
I never had you for an idealest. What I think they'll do is start
trying to sell
Jon, Andy,
I wish we did have something that supported a non-crappy interface like
EOB (eob.sourceforge.net)
Stuff like this reminds me of Velocity vs. JSP argument.
People realize that EJB sucks ass, so they develop something that is simple
to use and implement and makes some real
[mailto:bayard;generationjava.com]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 1:15 AM
To: Jakarta General List
Subject: Linux Magazine article
Linux Magazine's backpage article is a little thing on Java and Linux
together etc. [Steve J. Vaughan-Nichols]. Apache Software Foundation's
Jakarta project gets
James Mitchell wrote:
Is it true that Marc had asked to move JBoss over and that it was not
accepted?
I guess I was not around during that time (if it ever was). I had sensed
(from monitoring the Jboss-users and dev lists early this year) that there
was a bit of ill sentiment towards the
To: Jakarta General List
Subject: Linux Magazine article
Linux Magazine's backpage article is a little thing on Java and Linux
together etc. [Steve J. Vaughan-Nichols]. Apache Software Foundation's
Jakarta project gets a good mention, however he seems to ascribe JBoss as
being a Jakarta project
;superlinksoftware.com]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 8:55 AM
To: Jakarta General List
Subject: Re: Linux Magazine article
I just wanted to say. I like Marc. He's fun :-)
(but then again I like Jon too for many of the same reasons though I've
not met him in person so my judgement may
Is any of this true? Was Jboss rejected from joining Apache?
No, Jboss was not rejected from Jakarta. IIRC, they wanted to join and
jakarta said 'can we digest what we have first?', and jboss said, 'no
thanks', and then switched to LGPL.
Or something like that :)
Scott
--
To unsubscribe,
On 25/10/02 7:17, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it true that Marc had asked to move JBoss over and that it was not
accepted?
Question floats around from time to time... It always ends up in someone
being flamed badly and nothing happening...
The wishy-washy relationship started
On 25/10/02 19:14, Scott Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is any of this true? Was Jboss rejected from joining Apache?
No, Jboss was not rejected from Jakarta. IIRC, they wanted to join and
jakarta said 'can we digest what we have first?', and jboss said, 'no
thanks', and then switched to
Magazine article
...
Some history info:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=java-apache-frameworkm=97567909732611w=2
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail
Gaspar
-Original Message-
From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:nicolaken;apache.org]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 9:09 AM
To: Jakarta General List
Subject: Re: Linux Magazine article
...
Some history info:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=java-apache-frameworkm=97567909732611w=2
on 2002/10/25 5:16 PM, Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wish we did have something that supported a non-crappy interface like
EOB (eob.sourceforge.net)
Stuff like this reminds me of Velocity vs. JSP argument.
People realize that EJB sucks ass, so they develop something that is
[mailto:nicolaken;apache.org]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 9:09 AM
To: Jakarta General List
Subject: Re: Linux Magazine article
...
Some history info:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=java-apache-frameworkm=97567909732611w=
2
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Friday 25 October 2002 08:30 pm, Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
on 2002/10/25 5:16 PM, Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wish we did have something that supported a non-crappy interface like
EOB (eob.sourceforge.net)
Stuff like this reminds me of Velocity vs. JSP argument.
People
Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
on 2002/10/25 5:16 PM, Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wish we did have something that supported a non-crappy interface like
EOB (eob.sourceforge.net)
Stuff like this reminds me of Velocity vs. JSP argument.
Agreed. Velocity looks better than
Gaspar
-Original Message-
From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:nicolaken;apache.org]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 9:09 AM
To: Jakarta General List
Subject: Re: Linux Magazine article
...
Some history info:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=java-apache-frameworkm=97567909732611w=
2
Linux Magazine's backpage article is a little thing on Java and Linux
together etc. [Steve J. Vaughan-Nichols]. Apache Software Foundation's
Jakarta project gets a good mention, however he seems to ascribe JBoss as
being a Jakarta project :) Which is a shame that maybe Jakarta's brand is
being a
18 matches
Mail list logo
