se folks ?
As long as they are on topic, I have no problem with them. And if they
learn not to post HTML (as this one did, see his second posting), I'd be
rather happy.
Best regards,
Martin Stricker
--
Homepage: http://www.martin-stricker.de/
Regi
,
Perl, Python and Tcl/Tk, maybe more.
Best regards,
Martin Stricker
--
Homepage: http://www.martin-stricker.de/
Registered Linux user #210635: http://counter.li.org/
-
In case of troubles, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTE
ybe I'm just too stupid, but why should all the projects keep a
copy of their xml-commons code if it already is in xml-commons? Please
enlighten me since I get the feeling that this approach obsoletes
xml-commons.
Best regards,
Martin Stricker
--
Homepage: http://www.martin-stricker.de/
Regis
gt; donation as a sub-project.
+1, but I'm not a committer. Sounds really interesting. I already can
think of a use for this in the company I work for.
Best regards,
Martin Stricker
--
Homepage: http://www.martin-stricker.de/
Registered Linux user #210
ved by a
representative of each project. Dunno how this should be handled here
(since here there is mostly foreign code which isn't very likely to be
changed), but you might think about it.
Best regards,
Martin Stricker
--
Homepage: http://www.ma
f it's implemented in Java XLOB is the name to go! Slow like a slob...
;-D
But since this will be the Apache XML database it should be called AXDB,
of course, pronounced Axe DB: The axe in the database woods! ;-D
BTW Xindice looks ridiculous and seems to be unpronauncable...
Best r
ries: How active
is the development community for this project? Will your current
developers still work on the software when you'll donate it to the
Apache Software Foundation? A healthy development community is *very*
important for any Apache subproject.
Best regards,
Martin Stricker
--
ut I'm not a committer.
Best regards,
Martin Stricker
--
Homepage: http://www.martin-stricker.de/
Registered Linux user #210635: http://counter.li.org/
-
In case of troubles, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail
EMAIL PROTECTED] *ducks and runs*
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
> BartSays="Nobody reads these anymore."/>
So, why are you Reply-To-ing there? ;=D
Best regards,
Martin Stricker
--
Homepage: http://www.martin-stricker.de/
Registered Linux user #210635: http://counter
Tom Bradford wrote:
>
> Martin Stricker wrote:
> > A repository of XML and XSL tools, maybe called "xml-tools", should
> > be kept separate from xml-commons. I see xml-commons as a
> > inter-xml.apache.org project, and a tool collection definitely woul
intained only once. I guess
glue code wasn't a good wording, sorry.
Best regards,
Martin Stricker
--
Homepage: http://www.martin-stricker.de/
Registered Linux user #210635: http://counter.li.org/
-
In case of troubles
come a project, but perhaps Forrest+Gump
> does.
OTOH since both Gump and Forrest are doing cross-project stuff, would it
be a good idea to put them into xml-commons?
Best regards,
Martin Stricker
--
Homepage: http://www.mart
hange that.
>
> I don't want to say we shouldn't go the CSS way, but we might not be
> able in all cases to show our cool sites (in terms of technology used)
> to the ones having something to say in companies where others here
> like to bring in OS software.
That&#
tions. Both have clear user value in multiple xml.apache.org
> subprojects as you can see from FAQ's on the lists. And both are
> simple plug-ins using standard API's for existing xml projects.
+1 here, too.
Bes
2.3, but I'm not a committer. Reason: Since there is no way to
tell which version exactly such a third-party jar is, 2.3 sounds like
the best solution. If you can throw in exact versions and have also the
possibility of including several versions of the same .jar into CVS
(which should be
xt
Wouldn't it be better (especially if the lib-directory gets crammed up)
to have names like [packaga].README.txt and [package].LICENSE.txt along
with the [package].jar? So the [package] files would line up in a
directory listing.
Best gegards,
Martin Stricker
--
Homepage: http://www.ma
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This doesn't work? You should get a confirmation e-mail, and upon
replying to that you should be out.
Or try list-help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, that should send
you an e-mail with detailed instructions.
Best regards,
Martin Stricker
--
Homepage: http://ww
17 matches
Mail list logo
