ionut cucu wrote:
On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 20:59:02 +0200
Man, I've opened up a HUGE can o'worms here. I didn't mean to. But
back to the reason for the post, I cannot find the correct KDE4.1
overlay. I read that it was kdesvn-portage, but it's not that I can
tell. So, if it's not there, where
2008/6/2 Mark Haney [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ionut cucu wrote:
On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 20:59:02 +0200
Man, I've opened up a HUGE can o'worms here. I didn't mean to. But back
to the reason for the post, I cannot find the correct KDE4.1 overlay. I
read that it was kdesvn-portage, but it's not that
Beso wrote:
2008/6/2 Mark Haney [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ionut cucu wrote:
On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 20:59:02 +0200
Man, I've opened up a HUGE can o'worms here. I didn't mean to. But back
to the reason for the post, I cannot find the correct KDE4.1 overlay. I
read that it was kdesvn-portage, but
2008/6/2 Mark Haney [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Beso wrote:
2008/6/2 Mark Haney [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ionut cucu wrote:
On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 20:59:02 +0200
Man, I've opened up a HUGE can o'worms here. I didn't mean to. But
back
to the reason for the post, I cannot find the correct KDE4.1
Richard Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Sat, 31 May 2008 21:54:03 -0400:
but you can go one better. When paludis dies it can be asked to create
a resume script - a command line that will resume where it left off.
This will include all the packages
Hemmann, Volker Armin [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below,
on Sat, 31 May 2008 21:25:42 +0200:
http://www.pkgcore.org/trac/pkgcore/wiki/Features
http://www.pkgcore.org/trac/pkgcore/doc/doc/getting-started.rst
Thanks. =8^)
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No
David Leverton [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 01
Jun 2008 01:17:26 +0100:
Assuming you mean the log that I think you mean, that person was called
stupid due to
(zhllg) mlangc, actually i use this script to update the system: sudo
emerge -tauvDN world
2008/5/31 Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
David Leverton [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 31
May 2008 20:34:51 +0100:
On Saturday 31 May 2008 20:25:42 Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
New in pkgcore:
--ignore-failures:
[snip]
people who asked for a
On Samstag, 31. Mai 2008, David Leverton wrote:
On Saturday 31 May 2008 20:25:42 Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
New in pkgcore:
--ignore-failures:
[snip]
people who asked for a similar functionality in paludis were called
stupid. (asking for skipfirst equivalent)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]
On Sat, 31 May 2008 00:17:55 +0200
Hemmann, Volker Armin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, David Leverton wrote:
On Friday 30 May 2008 22:10:00 Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, David Leverton wrote:
oh really?
I don't think so.
You also
On Fri, 30 May 2008 22:16:06 +0200
Hemmann, Volker Armin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, Duncan wrote:
I've not done paludis due to its lack of binary package support.
Even tho I'm running only a single computer
there is another reason not to use paludis:
you can't
Hemmann, Volker Armin [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below,
on Fri, 30 May 2008 22:16:06 +0200:
On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, Duncan wrote:
I've not done paludis due to its lack of binary package support. Even
tho I'm running only a single computer
there is another
2008/5/30 Hemmann, Volker Armin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, Duncan wrote:
I've not done paludis due to its lack of binary package support. Even
tho I'm running only a single computer
there is another reason not to use paludis:
you can't go back.
At least not easily.
2008/5/30 David Leverton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Friday 30 May 2008 22:10:00 Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, David Leverton wrote:
oh really?
I don't think so.
You also think that
* it's Paludis's fault that the maintainers of some of the overlays I use
chose to
2008/5/30 Hemmann, Volker Armin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, David Leverton wrote:
On Friday 30 May 2008 21:16:06 Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, Duncan wrote:
I've not done paludis due to its lack of binary package support.
Even
tho I'm
2008/5/31 Richard Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
So, in my opinion, you are just a pro-paludis troll.
And from what I can see, trolls are the prefered audience and power behind
paludis.
Guys - let's try to keep this civil!
There are lots of folks who use and
2008/5/31 Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hemmann, Volker Armin [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below,
on Fri, 30 May 2008 22:16:06 +0200:
On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, Duncan wrote:
I've not done paludis due to its lack of binary package support. Even
tho I'm running
On Samstag, 31. Mai 2008, David Leverton wrote:
On Friday 30 May 2008 23:17:55 Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
So, in my opinion, you are just a pro-paludis troll.
And in my opinion, you are just an obsessive, delusional, anti-Paludis
fundamentalist. Whenever it (or Exherbo) is mentioned,
On Samstag, 31. Mai 2008, ionut cucu wrote:
2.when it comes to speed paludis is much faster
i use pkgcore. It can't go faster than 'instantly'
--
gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Saturday 31 May 2008 10:53:40 Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
really? I only see one paludis related 'thread' so far.
Look harder.
So could you tone down your personal attacks?
It's quite hilarious that you say that after your lies and FUD about the
entire Paludis team.
--
Beso [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Fri, 30 May 2008 19:17:59 +:
2008/5/30 Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Do the KDE-live builds require paludis? I recall reading that they
were headed that way, because it could support an EAPI with needed
features while
Beso [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Sat, 31 May 2008 09:08:38 +:
2008/5/31 Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So seeing someone that's actually using pkgcore is helpful. =8^)
does pkgcore has more features than portage?! i seem to remember trying
it about one
2008/5/31 Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Beso [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Fri, 30 May 2008 19:17:59 +:
2008/5/30 Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In any case, 4.1 appears to have fixed at least some of the 4.0 blockers,
including the big one here, the lack of
2008/5/31 Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Beso [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Sat, 31 May 2008 09:08:38 +:
the same goes for me, a kde user. i really need some gnome apps like pan
or firefox and just for it i need a big deal of gnome deps. and you
should
Beso [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Sat, 31 May 2008 15:43:21 +:
or you could just use the kde4 apps in kde3.5.
When I switch, I'll start using KDE4 for everything I can, so it'd be the
other way, KDE3 where I have to, KDE4 where it has been ported and
Beso [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Sat, 31 May 2008 18:24:08 +:
on the klibido site?! maybe its devs have gone with gtk+ and pan :-(
Dev, singular. At least from all indications and he said it was just
him, at one point. Of course, pan isn't much
Beso [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Sat, 31 May 2008 18:12:56 +:
by the way, a short question: what do i have to do to be sure that
kernel compilation uses ccache and is there a way to have it compiling
into ram like the packages that portage or paludis
2008/5/31 Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Beso [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Sat, 31 May 2008 18:12:56 +:
by the way, a short question: what do i have to do to be sure that
kernel compilation uses ccache and is there a way to have it compiling
into ram
On Samstag, 31. Mai 2008, Beso wrote:
another good thing of paludis is the use of sets that
include a list of packages. i've actually been using them to update live
packages without putting them all hand by hand everytime.
http://www.pkgcore.org/trac/pkgcore/wiki/Features
On Saturday 31 May 2008 20:25:42 Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
New in pkgcore:
--ignore-failures:
[snip]
people who asked for a similar functionality in paludis were called stupid.
(asking for skipfirst equivalent)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~] $ paludis --help
[snip]
--continue-on-failure Whether
David Leverton [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 31
May 2008 20:34:51 +0100:
On Saturday 31 May 2008 20:25:42 Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
New in pkgcore:
--ignore-failures:
[snip]
people who asked for a similar functionality in paludis were called
Duncan wrote:
I don't have a particular dog in this fight, but that's not the same
thing. --skip-first allows the admin to react to whatever when wrong,
try to fix it, and use the skip option only if he decides it's
warranted. IOW, it's sort of interactive, tho over time. It appears
this
Beso [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Fri, 30 May 2008 13:19:08 +:
you unistall it and install the new slot. the kde 4.1 should have the
kde4 slot while the kde4.1 beta has the kde4-live slot. you can clearly
see that they're different slots and that
2008/5/30 Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Beso [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Fri, 30 May 2008 13:19:08 +:
you unistall it and install the new slot. the kde 4.1 should have the
kde4 slot while the kde4.1 beta has the kde4-live slot. you can clearly
see
On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, Duncan wrote:
I've not done paludis due to its lack of binary package support. Even
tho I'm running only a single computer
there is another reason not to use paludis:
you can't go back.
At least not easily.
With pkgcore you can switch between pkgcore and portage
On Friday 30 May 2008 21:16:06 Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, Duncan wrote:
I've not done paludis due to its lack of binary package support. Even
tho I'm running only a single computer
there is another reason not to use paludis:
you can't go back.
At least not
David Leverton [EMAIL PROTECTED] skribis:
On Friday 30 May 2008 21:16:06 Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, Duncan wrote:
I've not done paludis due to its lack of binary package support. Even
tho I'm running only a single computer
there is another reason not to
On Friday 30 May 2008 21:48:03 Barry Schwartz wrote:
I suggest that Paludis delete that from the FAQ if the people
responsible don't want a reputation as bullies, because this is
bullying.
No it isn't.
There is also the example above of someone being accused of lying
simply for stating a
On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, David Leverton wrote:
On Friday 30 May 2008 21:16:06 Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, Duncan wrote:
I've not done paludis due to its lack of binary package support. Even
tho I'm running only a single computer
there is another reason not
On Friday 30 May 2008 22:10:00 Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, David Leverton wrote:
oh really?
I don't think so.
You also think that
* it's Paludis's fault that the maintainers of some of the overlays I use
chose to commit eclasses with the same names as those in the
On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, David Leverton wrote:
On Friday 30 May 2008 21:16:06 Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, Duncan wrote:
I've not done paludis due to its lack of binary package support. Even
tho I'm running only a single computer
there is another reason not
On Friday 30 May 2008 22:18:18 Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
http://www.gentooexperimental.org/not-the-gwn/not-the-gwn-current.html
for some numbers.
Lies, damned lies, and what was that other thing?
typical paludis-supporter behaviour:
On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, David Leverton wrote:
On Friday 30 May 2008 22:10:00 Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, David Leverton wrote:
oh really?
I don't think so.
You also think that
* it's Paludis's fault that the maintainers of some of the overlays I use
chose
On Friday 30 May 2008 23:17:55 Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
So, in my opinion, you are just a pro-paludis troll.
And in my opinion, you are just an obsessive, delusional, anti-Paludis
fundamentalist. Whenever it (or Exherbo) is mentioned, you're right there,
spewing your retarded lies and
On Samstag, 31. Mai 2008, David Leverton wrote:
typical paludis-supporter behaviour:
http://r0bertz.blogspot.com/2007/01/be-careful-when-you-are-on-paludis.ht
ml
ciaranm, known to game the system. Abusive against users.
rbrownspb, just removed because of their abusive behaviour.
On Saturday 31 May 2008 00:41:25 Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
You must have missed the forced retirement of spb and rbrown exactly
because of their behaviour. Do I need to find the bugzilla link for you?
There's nothing on any of those bugs that would come even close to justifying
retirement,
Hemmann, Volker Armin [EMAIL PROTECTED] skribis:
On Samstag, 31. Mai 2008, David Leverton wrote:
typical paludis-supporter behaviour:
http://r0bertz.blogspot.com/2007/01/be-careful-when-you-are-on-paludis.ht
ml
ciaranm, known to game the system. Abusive against users.
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
So, in my opinion, you are just a pro-paludis troll.
And from what I can see, trolls are the prefered audience and power behind
paludis.
Guys - let's try to keep this civil!
There are lots of folks who use and like paludis who aren't trolls. I'm
among them.
woops, my bad, I didn't mean to send that to the list.
(Much embarassment)
--
gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 7:15 PM, Richard Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
So, in my opinion, you are just a pro-paludis troll.
And from what I can see, trolls are the prefered audience and power behind
paludis.
Guys - let's try to keep this civil!
There are
50 matches
Mail list logo
