Re: [gentoo-dev] unmounting a filesystem mounted by /init (initramfs)

2005-07-29 Thread Rafael Ávila de Espíndola
On Thursday 28 July 2005 23:50, Jeff Walter wrote: Rafael, I have no clue if this will work, but maybe try the -n option. The man says that it won't write to /etc/mtab, but I'm hoping it will ignore it as well and just go for the mount. Also, you'll be remounting / as read-only

[gentoo-dev] Proposed change to base.eclass: patch || die

2005-07-29 Thread Dan Armak
Hi all, base.eclass (which inherited by many other eclasses) has an src_unpack supporting patching from patchfiles listed in $PATCHES. However, today, if patching fails the process doesn't abort. So I propose: == --- base.eclass 11 Jul 2005 15:08:06 - 1.27 +++

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed change to base.eclass: patch || die

2005-07-29 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Friday 29 July 2005 15:56, Dan Armak wrote: base.eclass (which inherited by many other eclasses) has an src_unpack supporting patching from patchfiles listed in $PATCHES. However, today, if patching fails the process doesn't abort. Why can't we just use epatch? -- Diego Flameeyes Pettenò

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed change to base.eclass: patch || die

2005-07-29 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Friday 29 July 2005 16:05, Dan Armak wrote: Anyway, the effective change would be to die if patching fails (and support patchlevels != 0), so my orig question stands. epatch already takes care of failing, that's why I was thinking about that :) -- Diego Flameeyes Pettenò Gentoo Developer -

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proposed change to base.eclass: patch || die

2005-07-29 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Friday 29 July 2005 17:31, Mike Frysinger wrote: from a QA point of view, no package should apply a patch, have the patching fail, but continue to emerge ... who knows what kind of garbage you'll end up with This can be read as it's good to use epatch ? :P -- Diego Flameeyes Pettenò Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proposed change to base.eclass: patch || die

2005-07-29 Thread Carsten Lohrke
On Friday 29 July 2005 17:40, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: This can be read as it's good to use epatch ? :P It's just less text to write PATCHES=foo ..., if you don't have a src_unpack function in the particular ebuild. Carsten pgpVewopKrcSC.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proposed change to base.eclass: patch || die

2005-07-29 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Friday 29 July 2005 19:02, Carsten Lohrke wrote: Don't get what you want to say... I read Diego's comment as an ironic one, that there's no need for the PATCHES variable, which is of course true, but you don't have to write src_unpack(){ foo_unpack ; epatch some_patch } just for a single

Re: [gentoo-dev] News on PHP5 support on Gentoo

2005-07-29 Thread Alexander Simonov
цитата от=Stuart Herbert We're working to provide support for both PHP4 and PHP5 running on the same box. At the moment, this work is available in a tarball overlay [1], along with a number of supporting eselect modules [2],[3],[4]. The overlay contains new dev-lang/php packages, and PHP

[gentoo-dev] LWE Exhibit badges courtesy of Gentoo

2005-07-29 Thread Corey Shields
If you happen to be registering for an Exhibit Hall badge for the upcoming LinuxWorld Expo in San Francisco, use priority code N0339 to let them know that you're coming to support Gentoo! The badges are free if registering in advance, and $35 at the door. However, if you use this code the

Re: [gentoo-dev] unmounting a filesystem mounted by /init (initramfs)

2005-07-29 Thread Ned Ludd
On Fri, 2005-07-29 at 08:48 -0300, Rafael Ávila de Espíndola wrote: On Thursday 28 July 2005 23:50, Jeff Walter wrote: Rafael, I have no clue if this will work, but maybe try the -n option. The man says that it won't write to /etc/mtab, but I'm hoping it will ignore it as well and