On 04/08/05 14:37 -0500, Brian D. Harring wrote:
snip
Hell, I have yet to see what I would define as a proper solution for
config manamagent for N gentoo boxes. NFS solution possibly, but that
seems a bit hackish to me.
http://www.infrastructures.org/ is a good place to start.
Devdas
On Aug 6, 2005, at 1:16 AM, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
* no lvm or software raid support
If the installer detects an already-present lvm/raid, will it allow
you to use it for your disks? The reason that I ask this is I am
wondering if it is still possible to perform the necessary setup
steps
On Friday 05 August 2005 12:34, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Friday 29 July 2005 15:56, Dan Armak wrote:
base.eclass (which inherited by many other eclasses) has an src_unpack
supporting patching from patchfiles listed in $PATCHES. However, today,
if patching fails the process
The new valgrind version (3.0.0) requires sse support. If you have a
processor without sse, you'll need to stay at 2.4.1.
To make people aware of this, I could use the sse use flag in 3.0.0
and die if it is not present, telling people to mask versions 3.0.0
and up if they have a processor
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Aug 6, 2005, at 1:16 AM, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
* no lvm or software raid support
If the installer detects an already-present lvm/raid, will it allow you
to use it for your disks? The reason that I ask this is I am wondering
if it is still possible to perform
On Sat, 6 Aug 2005 16:15:32 +0200 Maurice van der Pot
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| The new valgrind version (3.0.0) requires sse support. If you have a
| processor without sse, you'll need to stay at 2.4.1.
|
| To make people aware of this, I could use the sse use flag in 3.0.0
| and die if it is
Yuri Vasilevski wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 06 Aug 2005 20:04:20 +0300
Ivan Yosifov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not sure if it is better, but you can
cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep flags | grep sse
and die if not found.
This will make packages dependant on the build system,
which will create
Maurice van der Pot wrote:
The new valgrind version (3.0.0) requires sse support. If you have a
processor without sse, you'll need to stay at 2.4.1.
To make people aware of this, I could use the sse use flag in 3.0.0
and die if it is not present, telling people to mask versions 3.0.0
and up
On Saturday 06 August 2005 21:24, R Hill wrote:
compile a small test program containing SSE specific intrinsics and die
if it returns an error code? does valgrind's configure check for sse?
That will break while preparing packages for another machine (cross-compile
the simple way).
Checks that
Hi all.
It's my pleasure to announce three new forums moderators officially
joining Gentoo. They've all been forum moderators for a while so I'm sure
you all know them quite well by now if you've ever been to the forums.
Here's's a short introduction to each of them for those who don't know
them
Brian D. Harring wrote:
Hola all, patch (incvs now) to fix up a traceback on first sync with
an empty tree; bug #96410
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96410
The fix isn't exactly what I'd call pretty (creating an intermediate
portdbapi and config instance to do the updates), but it's a
11 matches
Mail list logo
