[gentoo-dev] A question about USE flags...

2005-11-08 Thread Michele Noberasco
I have a package, x11-plugins/wmhdplop, which depends on media-libs/imlib2 being compiled with 'X' USE flag set. Is there a way to specify such a dependancy? Right now I added a warning if 'X' USE flag is not set, but I don't like this solution, as it might not always catch the problem (i.e.: USE

Re: [gentoo-dev] A question about USE flags...

2005-11-08 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 10:04:48AM +0100, Michele Noberasco wrote: I have a package, x11-plugins/wmhdplop, which depends on media-libs/imlib2 being compiled with 'X' USE flag set. Is there a way to specify such a dependancy? Right now I added a warning if 'X' USE flag is not set, but I don't

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council meeting Tuesday, November 15th, 20:00 UTC

2005-11-08 Thread Thierry Carrez
The November Gentoo Council meeting will be held on #gentoo-council next week, Tuesday, November 15th, 20:00 UTC, presided by Seemant Kulleen. The deadline for submitting items for the meeting agenda is set to Sunday, November 13th, 20:00 UTC. -- Thierry Carrez (Koon) Gentoo Council Member --

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council meeting Tuesday, November 15th, 20:00 UTC

2005-11-08 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 17:30:02 +0100 Thierry Carrez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | The November Gentoo Council meeting will be held on #gentoo-council | next week, Tuesday, November 15th, 20:00 UTC, presided by Seemant | Kulleen. | | The deadline for submitting items for the meeting agenda is set to |

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council meeting Tuesday, November 15th, 20:00 UTC

2005-11-08 Thread Daniel Ostrow
On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 17:57 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 17:30:02 +0100 Thierry Carrez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | The November Gentoo Council meeting will be held on #gentoo-council | next week, Tuesday, November 15th, 20:00 UTC, presided by Seemant | Kulleen. | | The

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council meeting Tuesday, November 15th, 20:00 UTC

2005-11-08 Thread Stuart Herbert
On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 17:30 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: The November Gentoo Council meeting will be held on #gentoo-council next week, Tuesday, November 15th, 20:00 UTC, presided by Seemant Kulleen. The deadline for submitting items for the meeting agenda is set to Sunday, November 13th,

[gentoo-dev] SCALE call for papers - anyone submitting one?

2005-11-08 Thread Stuart Herbert
Hi, I noticed that SCALE has launched their call for papers for the next conference, in February 2006. The call for papers runs until 20th November. http://www.socallinuxexpo.org/pr/pr_20050620.php I'm currently thinking of submitting one around our support for web-based applications. I was

Re: [gentoo-dev] divx4linux sudden death

2005-11-08 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 30 October 2005 03:22 pm, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: On Sunday 30 October 2005 21:09, Peter Ruskin wrote: Steady on Diego - what replaces divx4linux then? ffmpeg and xvid are enough to decode and encode divx files. that avoids the implied question can ffmpeg/xvid be used as

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] release versioning meaning

2005-11-08 Thread Brian Harring
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 11:54:11AM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: On Sunday 06 November 2005 06:09, Brian Harring wrote: We've pretty much ignored the minor, and abused the micro for both bug fixing and feature inclusion. Thoughts on using micro for _strictly_ bug fixes, and macro for

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] release versioning meaning

2005-11-08 Thread Jason Stubbs
On Tuesday 08 November 2005 17:29, Brian Harring wrote: On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 11:54:11AM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: On Sunday 06 November 2005 06:09, Brian Harring wrote: Yes we'll run aground of the dead 2.1 release (not incredibly happy about that), but I'd like to see if we can get

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] release versioning meaning

2005-11-08 Thread Brian Harring
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 07:39:01PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: If the changes are reviewed roughly in proportion to the number of hunks, we should be okay. At minimum, we should at least see how .54 turns out as there will be a few major changes in there already. I kind of expect .54 to do

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] release versioning meaning

2005-11-08 Thread Jason Stubbs
On Tuesday 08 November 2005 19:42, Brian Harring wrote: On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 07:39:01PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: If the changes are reviewed roughly in proportion to the number of hunks, we should be okay. At minimum, we should at least see how .54 turns out as there will be a few

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] release versioning meaning

2005-11-08 Thread Brian Harring
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 06:32:18PM +0100, Marius Mauch wrote: On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 02:29:14 -0600 Question is how will it scale for non-bugfixes, disruptive changes like cache backport, elog backporting, confcache, etc? What I'm concerned about is what's going to occur with .5x when large