Sven Köhler wrote:
at the moment, /usr/lib/pppd/2.4.2/rp-pppoe.so is installed by
net-dialup/ppp - nothing special - well, it's not a very recent version.
In the syslog it says:
RP-PPPoE plugin version 3.3 compiled against pppd 2.4.2
On the other hand, i've got net-dialup/rp-pppoe-3.8 installed
/etc/ppp/plugins/rp-pppoe.so - /usr/lib/pppd/2.4.2/rp-pppoe.so
Is this symlink needed? And why is it installed by rp-pppoe?
(And is the /etc/ppp/plugins dir needed at all? What do plugins do in
/etc/ppp/plugins? Don't they belong to /usr/lib/pppd/2.4.2/ ?)
That is the place where
Hello there,
net-analyzer/base is a web front-end for the net-analyzer/snort IDS.
It is actively maintained and based on net-analyzer/acid, whose last
release is from 2003. For this reason, migration from ACID to BASE is
recommended.
There is a guide [0] in the forums that you may find useful.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If you are a dev and would like to help with mozilla herd please step
up and help in maintaining mozilla/seamonkey/thunderbird/enigmail and
all other ebuilds owned by the herd.
If your not a dev and would like to help out find me, you
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14970 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Loeser wrote:
Here is the newest revision of my proposal. Not much has changed, but I
added and changed some small things. Constructive feedback is
appreciated. I'd like to get this voted on by the council at the next
meeting.
* The QA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* If a particular developer persistently causes breakage, the QA team
may request that devrel re-evaluates that developer's commit rights.
Evidence of past breakages will be presented with this request to
devrel.
define persistently, how
I had an idea this morning about implementing glsa as a special set. I
know the current portage code base is not ready for /etc/portage/sets
support, but I thought it might be an easy way to integrate a glsa
up/downgrades group (set) listing in portholes upgrades view (needs some
familiarity of
I've finished my superkaramba theme, but I'm noticing one bug that I
think has something to do the way emerge or portage modules are
written that I don't understand.
Basically, I've trimmed everything in emerge down that doesn't
directly deal with system or a world update. I import my trimmed
On Sun, 2006-23-04 at 23:05 -0400, Tom Hosiawa wrote:
I've finished my superkaramba theme, but I'm noticing one bug that I
think has something to do the way emerge or portage modules are
written that I don't understand.
Basically, I've trimmed everything in emerge down that doesn't
directly
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 23 April 2006 12:36, Alec Warner wrote:
Modified:
main/trunk/bin/sed
Log:
Make sed wrapper not executable.
why ? it isnt hurting anything to be set executable
-mike
At present it is not in the pre9 tarball. However it is in SVN, so it
will make it
On Monday 24 April 2006 01:09, Alec Warner wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 23 April 2006 12:36, Alec Warner wrote:
Modified:
main/trunk/bin/sed
Log:
Make sed wrapper not executable.
why ? it isnt hurting anything to be set executable
At present it is not in the pre9
12 matches
Mail list logo
