Carsten Lohrke wrote:
RDEPEND=cvs? ( dev-util/cvs )
svn? ( dev-util/subversion )
!cvs? ( ! svn? ( dev-util/cvs ) )
Huh? How about:
RDEPEND=|| ( dev-util/cvs dev-util/subversion )
IMO, your example is a USE flag abuse.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Saturday 29 April 2006 03:08, Alin Nastac wrote:
Carsten Lohrke wrote:
RDEPEND=cvs? ( dev-util/cvs )
svn? ( dev-util/subversion )
!cvs? ( ! svn? ( dev-util/cvs ) )
Huh? How about:
RDEPEND=|| ( dev-util/cvs dev-util/subversion )
IMO, your example is a USE flag abuse.
not
Ryan Phillips wrote:
Stable and unstable keywords are a hack on top of a version control
system. We wouldn't have them if gentoo used an SCM that supports true
branches. There would be no need.
Umm, I'm not an ebuild dev, but how would users mix stable and unstable
packages in such a case?
On Saturday 29 April 2006 09:08, Alin Nastac wrote:
Huh? How about:
RDEPEND=|| ( dev-util/cvs dev-util/subversion )
Similar problem as with Tuan's version: It's intransparent to the user and he
has no choice, unless he looks into the ebuild. || ( foo bar ) is only an
option, if you have two
On Friday 28 April 2006 20:14, Ryan Phillips wrote:
__Problem: Live Tree__
Having a live tree requires people to be perfect. People are not perfect
and requiring it is ridiculous. I love having commits in my local tree
within the hour, but having a stable and unstable branch makes a lot of
On Friday 28 April 2006 23:42, Ryan Phillips wrote:
svn
+ Atomic Commits
+ Merging/tagging/brancing is a simple copy operation
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.1/ch04.html
+ lots of benefits
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.intro.features.html
there is more I'm sure
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 03:02:46PM +0300, Dan Armak wrote:
On Friday 28 April 2006 23:42, Ryan Phillips wrote:
svn
+ Atomic Commits
+ Merging/tagging/brancing is a simple copy operation
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.1/ch04.html
+ lots of benefits
On Saturday 29 April 2006 15:21, Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
The commit marked with @ is a special comit called a 'merge'.
I hope that clarifies the merge tracking part.
You just described what merging is. Svn can do that too with svn merge. But,
if I merge changesets from branch A to B
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 03:54:17PM +0300, Dan Armak wrote:
On Saturday 29 April 2006 15:21, Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
The commit marked with @ is a special comit called a 'merge'.
I hope that clarifies the merge tracking part.
You just described what merging is. Svn can do that too with svn
On Saturday 29 April 2006 05:01, Drake Wyrm wrote:
I stand corrected. Might it be acceptable, though, to set it with
something like
No, it's an user variable.
--
Diego Flameeyes Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/
Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
What is interesting is that Source Mage Linux has already voted on a proposal
similar to mine[2]. I truly think that making some changes in the gentoo
way
would benefit us and make gentoo a truly better distribution.
Ryan
Gentoo Developer
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 05:01:20PM -0500, Daniel Goller wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Cort wrote:
On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 21:42:57 +0200
Bryan Østergaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So.. What can we do to improve things?
I think that there should be some sort
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 08:41:31AM -0500, Daniel Goller wrote:
inviting community) and why you think stricter test make for better
developers, why you think harder tests would cut down more on the quick
in and out people.
Empirical evidence agrees.
Our current quiz practices have done a good
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jon Portnoy wrote:
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 08:41:31AM -0500, Daniel Goller wrote:
inviting community) and why you think stricter test make for better
developers, why you think harder tests would cut down more on the quick
in and out people.
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 08:05:06PM -0500, Daniel Goller wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Simon Stelling wrote:
Hi Ryan,
Ryan Phillips wrote:
I believe the way Gentoo is doing things is broken. There I have said
it. The
entire project has reached a level of
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 09:38:17AM -0500, Daniel Goller wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jon Portnoy wrote:
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 08:41:31AM -0500, Daniel Goller wrote:
inviting community) and why you think stricter test make for better
developers, why you think
Jan Kundrát wrote:
Ryan Phillips wrote:
Stable and unstable keywords are a hack on top of a version control
system. We wouldn't have them if gentoo used an SCM that supports true
branches. There would be no need.
Umm, I'm not an ebuild dev, but how would users mix stable and unstable
On Sat, 2006-04-29 at 00:41 +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
Stuart Herbert wrote:
What is the reason for the mask? Modular Xorg incompatibility in nx-x11?
Because it should not have been unmasked in the first place. That was a
mistake on my part, to not notice that I hadn't masked it when I
Hi Ryan,
I hope you find these comments useful.
On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 10:14 -0700, Ryan Phillips wrote:
__Problem: Developer Growth__
Why do people have to take a test?
There are certain skills we need a developer to demonstrate before we
can give them commit access. There is currently
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 10:33:11PM +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote:
__Problem: Developer Growth__
Why do people have to take a test?
There are certain skills we need a developer to demonstrate before we
can give them commit access. There is currently no opportunity for a
Alexandre Buisse wrote:
The opensolaris project has done a similar thing[1]. The three finalists
were bazaar[2], mercurial[3] and git[4], and the winner was eventually
mercurial. This is also the recommended choice from the EuroBSDcon
slides, so definitely something to consider.
Indeed,
Stuart Herbert wrote:
__Problem: CVS__
CVS is one of the worst application ever created.
Hear, hear.
I'd like to see a move to Subversion made a priority for 2006. If there
are problems with Subversion's performance with our tree, engage with
its authors to obtain improvements. But
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 08:55:52PM -0500, Lance Albertson wrote:
Stuart Herbert wrote:
__Problem: CVS__
CVS is one of the worst application ever created.
Hear, hear.
I'd like to see a move to Subversion made a priority for 2006. If there
are problems with Subversion's
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 05:00:10PM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Alexandre Buisse wrote:
The opensolaris project has done a similar thing[1]. The three finalists
were bazaar[2], mercurial[3] and git[4], and the winner was eventually
mercurial. This is also the recommended choice from the
Stuart Herbert wrote:
I'm offering to lead the effort to establish a global Gentoo developer
conference, and to do whatever it takes to get everything we need to
make this happen. Now who's up for this? :)
Best regards,
Stu
That sounds like a great idea.
-Ryan
--
On Sun, 2006-09-04 at 11:42 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian wrote:
Just a word of caution. I don't know why but sometimes after an upgrade
of portage a reload(portage) in porthole fails and porthole crashes. I
don't remember the details atm
Upon further testing, I'm updating a line in the patch
On 4/28/06, m h [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks-
I'm submitting a patch of a refactoring of the emerge code in
2.1_pre9-r5. This patch adds no features per se. But I believe it
makes the code much more readable. This only addresses the
Is there any chance you can break this up? Mostly one patch for each *
below? OTherwise it's rather large ( 1000 lines ) and is difficult to
figure out what/when/where happened
m h wrote:
Upon further testing, I'm updating a line in the patch
On 4/28/06, m h [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I can break it up, but it will probably be 3 one line changes and
one big 1000 line change. The 1000 line change is pretty
straightforward. The only real code changes per se are removing any
default logic (and placing it under the __main__ section). Let me see
what I can do...
I also
29 matches
Mail list logo
