Re: [gentoo-dev] pybugz - python command line interface to bugzilla

2006-07-17 Thread Alastair Tse
On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 11:28 +0100, Chris Bainbridge wrote: On 16/07/06, Alastair Tse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, As a little weekend project, I wrote a command line interface to bugzilla in Python that is targetted to Gentoo's bugzilla (but also generalisable to other bugzillas

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making dobin, doexe, doins, doman, dodoc die by default

2006-07-17 Thread Aron Griffis
Vapier wrote: [Thu Jul 13 2006, 11:32:39PM EDT] On Wednesday 12 July 2006 13:37, Stefan Schweizer wrote: SpanKY complained that he cannot set a custom die message then. But this is not needed here, since every do* command can be clearly identified by the argument and the directory it will

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making dobin, doexe, doins, doman, dodoc die by default

2006-07-17 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 17 July 2006 11:14, Aron Griffis wrote: Vapier wrote: [Thu Jul 13 2006, 11:32:39PM EDT] On Wednesday 12 July 2006 13:37, Stefan Schweizer wrote: SpanKY complained that he cannot set a custom die message then. But this is not needed here, since every do* command can be clearly

[gentoo-dev] migrating packages to the new Java system

2006-07-17 Thread Joshua Nichols
-generation-2/not-migrated-20060717 The progress is at: http://dev.gentoo.org/~nelchael/java-generation-2/progress.txt Right now, we have some 366 packages to migrate... So we are looking for help, since there are only a few active Java members! So, if you are a developer interested in helping

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making dobin, doexe, doins, doman, dodoc die by default

2006-07-17 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 06:00:04PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: at this point i'm against it due to the loss of information/granularity in the die message ... and utilizing DIE_MSG is garbage if die can be made more useful, then i'd be for the do* functions calling die for me -mike How

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Treecleaners - More Cowbell]

2006-07-17 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alec Warner wrote: [. . .] You win the Thread Title of the Month award! There's no such thing as too much cowbell. :p -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEvCkDrsJQqN81j74RAhIiAJ9qX2Eh5qM8/4BHACsm+7GpjnsJWwCfVQWx

[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Porage API Documentation Proposal

2006-07-17 Thread Chris White
Here's round 3. I've striped out the known issues, since everyone know nows them. Replaced that missing link, and clarified on the give an example bit.On 7/17/06, Chris White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I had a discussion yesterday with the folks and #gentoo-portage regarding API

[gentoo-portage-dev] disable checking sums of downloaded sources

2006-07-17 Thread est_...@o2.pl
Hi, Is it any way to disable checking digests after download sources via `ebuild program.ebuild fetch`? Any INTERNAL flag or VARIABLE ? Best Regards Piotr J. -- gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Porage API Documentation Proposal

2006-07-17 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chris White wrote: Here's round 3. I've striped out the known issues, since everyone know nows them. Replaced that missing link, and clarified on the give an example bit. It looks good to me. I've taken the liberty of committing your pkgcomp