On Monday 17 July 2006 11:14, Aron Griffis wrote:
> Vapier wrote:  [Thu Jul 13 2006, 11:32:39PM EDT]
>
> > On Wednesday 12 July 2006 13:37, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> > > SpanKY complained that he cannot set a custom die message then. But
> > > this is not needed here, since every do* command can be clearly
> > > identified by the argument and the directory it will be installed to.
> >
> > except for the times where the do funcs can install the same file in
> > different code paths
>
> Maybe fixup die() to include the call stack w/ function line numbers?
>
> I can't tell from your reply whether you dislike do* dying
> automatically, or if you just don't like some implementation details.
> Which is it?

at this point i'm against it due to the loss of information/granularity in the 
die message ... and utilizing DIE_MSG is garbage

if die can be made more useful, then i'd be for the do* functions calling die 
for me
-mike

Attachment: pgpiGOb66a1WE.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to