середа, 11. жовтень 2006 23:12, Stuart Herbert Ви написали:
We don't need a management hierarchy just to bring some structure to
the docs on the website.I don't see any benefit in creating a TLP
for programming languages. If we were to move programming languages
around, for example, I'd
середа, 11. жовтень 2006 22:30, Matthew Kennedy Ви написали:
I think this proposal is OK even it is just to organize the top level
listing a bit better. It seems like a real mix right now -- Council
next to Common Lisp, PR next to Python and so on etc.
Yea, this is exactly why I want to
On 10/12/06, George Shapovalov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Funnily I already got questions like is this thing only to move stuff around?
I would be all for it if it had a bit more meat. I added that PPS expecting
questions like that would be asked. Of course, realistically I do not
think anything
On 10/11/06, Stephen Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We also use space-delimited depend atoms everywhere else. It makes no
sense to break that when a comma works equally well.
I'm sorry, are you telling everyone that it's too difficult for you to
write an ungreedy regex that also tests for
George Shapovalov wrote:
Well, it seemed like a small tool, having a TLP for which is a gross
overkill,
eselect is anything but a small tool...
I'd just reorder docs in a more rational way but let our flat tlp as is.
lu
--
Luca Barbato
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC
On 10/11/06, Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not an issue for me. It's an issue for random people writing scripts,
for people using command line things and for people who don't want to
use a full parser framework for some quick hack. There's no need to
make things harder for random
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 19:33:16 +0200, George Shapovalov wrote:
Hi gang.
[snip]
The principal list of individual TLPs (as they stand now) is below:
Common Lisp
eselect
java
perl
php
python
Ada -- to be added
Hi,
if you go ahead with it, we'll probably want to add a ml subproject.
As per summary, net-im/kopete is going away (again).
For a while upstrem released some versions out of the KDE release cycle
(0.12_alpha through 0.12.2), but now 0.12.3 was merged again inside
kdenetwork-3.5.5, so the point of having it in net-im is gone again.
As I've heard the most foolish
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 09:52:42 +0100
Stuart Herbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sorry, are you telling everyone that it's too difficult for you to
write an ungreedy regex that also tests for the possibility of a list
bounded by [ and ] being part of an atom?
No. I'm saying that it's more
This isn't going to bring any benefits to anyone. If you want to help
users find docs on programming languages on Gentoo (assuming there
_are_ any users who don't know how to Google for such things), just
get the docs team to organise 'Programming Languages on Gentoo' docs
category on [1].
I know what unsupported means chris. what I'm referring to though are
bugs that would affect i686 as well. but possibly get closed because a
dev, like yourself, requested emerge --info and saw it was build on
i686 and closes it for that reason. probably RESOLVED WONTFIX .
On 10/11/06, Chris
On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 22:17 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 22:08:31 +0100 Stuart Herbert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On 10/11/06, Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Spaces in dep atoms would be highly evil, since it'd mean they were
| no longer simply space
Dear All,
I'm forwarding this on behalf of Spider. If anyone would like to send a
message to him, please respond to me privately and I'll forward your
wishes along.
Thanks,
Seemant
--- BEGIN
Well, I guess the time has come to say farewell.
Not without a slight taste of bitterness in my
Seemant Kulleen napisał(a):
Dear All,
I'm forwarding this on behalf of Spider. If anyone would like to send a
message to him, please respond to me privately and I'll forward your
wishes along.
Thanks,
Seemant
--- BEGIN
Well, I guess the time has come to say farewell.
Not
Brian Harring wrote:
cat/pkg[use1_on,-use2_off,-use3_on]
You mean use3_on, without the minus sign, right?
Cheers,
-jkt
--
cd /local/pub more beer /dev/mouth
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 10:00:05 +0100 Stuart Herbert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On 10/11/06, Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Not an issue for me. It's an issue for random people writing
| scripts, for people using command line things and for people who
| don't want to use a full parser
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 14:24:36 +0200 Natanael Copa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| btw.. I keep hearing about this paladius. Is it more script-friendly
| than emerge?
Once we get the Ruby interface fleshed out it will be...
--
Ciaran McCreesh
Mail: ciaranm at ciaranm.org
Web
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 09:52:42 +0100 Stuart Herbert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On 10/11/06, Stephen Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| We also use space-delimited depend atoms everywhere else. It makes
| no sense to break that when a comma works equally well.
|
| I'm sorry, are you telling
On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 16:18 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 14:24:36 +0200 Natanael Copa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| btw.. I keep hearing about this paladius. Is it more script-friendly
| than emerge?
Once we get the Ruby interface fleshed out it will be...
What about
Natanael Copa wrote:
btw.. I keep hearing about this paladius. Is it more script-friendly
than emerge?
It's paludis, and no, the API is currently C++ only, afaik. There are ruby
bindings in the works, though. The other alternative, pkgcore, has a python
API...as does portage itself. None of
Seemant Kulleen wrote: [Thu Oct 12 2006, 08:50:33AM CDT]
A typical example of the institutionalisation of the project is myself.
Had anyone just bothered to send me an email I would have replied.
no, he's gone, terminate the account.that part works.
But.
You could have told me.
A
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 11:03:41 -0500
Andrew Gaffney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's paludis, and no, the API is currently C++ only, afaik. There
are ruby bindings in the works, though. The other alternative,
pkgcore, has a python API...as does portage itself. None of the
options have an interface
Grant Goodyear wrote:
Seemant Kulleen wrote: [Thu Oct 12 2006, 08:50:33AM CDT]
A typical example of the institutionalisation of the project is myself.
Had anyone just bothered to send me an email I would have replied.
no, he's gone, terminate the account.that part works.
But.
You
Hi, im sorry about creating a flamewar. But their are a view points
that disturb me really:
- The same installtion (networkless!) possibilites should be offered to
the people who install via the shell (the oldschool an most often used
way i believe), the ncurses-installer and the gtk-installer. I
четвер, 12. жовтень 2006 10:47, Stuart Herbert написав:
This isn't going to bring any benefits to anyone. If you want to help
users find docs on programming languages on Gentoo (assuming there
_are_ any users who don't know how to Google for such things), just
get the docs team to organise
Hi,
I've noticed in the past that a lot of people come to irc with problems
in some area (say networking) that are easy to solve just by first
asking a number of questions to identify the problem and then providing
the solution.
I've always liked the way Microsoft put these troubleshooters in
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 17:41:20 +0200 Natanael Copa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 16:18 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 14:24:36 +0200 Natanael Copa
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| | btw.. I keep hearing about this paladius. Is it more
| | script-friendly than
I have a couple of questions:
1) Does this sound like a good idea?
2) Does anyone feel like pouring his/her troubleshooting skills into
content for my program?
1.) maybe microsofts troubleshooter sucks, it never solved a single problem I
had. this will only be a good Idea if we're
On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 20:06 +0200, Peter Weber wrote:
- The same installtion (networkless!) possibilites should be offered to
the people who install via the shell (the oldschool an most often used
way i believe), the ncurses-installer and the gtk-installer. I
personally think a real Stage-3
Do not top post, is rude.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top-posting
Peter Weber wrote:
You seem to think that the discussion is around you, and your work :-)
It is about Gentoo, please keep this in mind. Nobody says YOU have to
make the work, or that you are doing sth. wrong. You could do
On Thursday 12 October 2006 02:19, Michael Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 08:35 -0700, Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh wrote:
Eldad Zack wrote:
Christian Heim wrote:
Its my pleasure to introduce to you Alon alonbl Bar-Lev, the latest
addition joining to help out with the crypto herd.
Lance Albertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Thu, 12 Oct 2006 11:56:02 -0500:
Grant Goodyear wrote:
Seemant Kulleen wrote: [Thu Oct 12 2006, 08:50:33AM CDT]
A typical example of the institutionalisation of the project [...]
A minor correction here:
32 matches
Mail list logo
